Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 868-874

  Maas, Cornelis P ^a   Kenter, Gemma G ^a   Trimbos, J Baptist ^a   Deruiter, Marco C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Autonomic nervous system; Cervix neoplasms; Hysterectomy; Immunohistochemistry

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; PROTEIN S 100; TYROSINE 3 MONOOXYGENASE; TYROSINE 3 MONOOXYGENASE ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSECTION; HUMAN; HYPOGASTRIC NERVE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NERVE INJURY; PELVIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOPSY; CADAVER; DISSECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOGASTRIC PLEXUS; HYSTERECTOMY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LIGAMENTS; PELVIS; S100 PROTEINS; TYROSINE 3-MONOOXYGENASE; UTERUS;

EID: 24044444282     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00742.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Samlal RAK, van der Velden J, Ketting BW et al. Disease-free interval and recurrence pattern after the Okabayashi variant of Wertheim's radical hysterectomy for stage Ib and IIa cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1996; 6: 120-7.
2. Kenter GG, Ansink AC, Heintz APM, Delemarre J, Aartsen EJ, Hart AAM. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix stage I and IIA. Results of surgical treatment: complications, recurrence and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 1989; 15: 55-60.
3. Bergmark K, Avail-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningson L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1383-9.
4. Sood AK, Nygaard I, Shahin MS, Sorosky JI, Lutgendorf SK, Rao SS. Anorectal dysfunction after surgical treatment for cervical cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195: 513-9.
5. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y, Nakajima T. Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77: 155-63.
6. Höckel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CP. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: Oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 971-6.
7. Kuwabara Y, Suzuki M, Hashimoto M, Furugen Y, Yoshida K, Mitsuhashi N. New method to prevent bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2000; 26: 1-8.
8. Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 79: 154-7.
9. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, DeRuiter MC, Peters AAW, Kenter GG. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy; guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11: 180-6.
10. Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LDK, A'Hern RP, Polak JM, Barton DPJ. Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: the nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments. Cancer 2000; 89: 834-41.
11. Piver MS, Rutledge FN, Smith PJ. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 44: 265-72.
12. Yucel S, Baskin LS. Neuroanatomy of the ureterovesical junction: clinical implications. J Urol 2003; 170: 945-8.
13. Johansson S, Stromberg I. Fetal lateral ganglionic eminence attracts one of two morphologically different types of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive nerve fibers formed by cultured ventral mesencephalon. Cell Transplant 2003; 12: 243-55.
14. Verberne ME, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, van Iperen L, Poelmann RE. Contribution of the cervical sympathetic ganglia to the innervation of the pharyngeal arch arteries and the heart in the chick embryo. Anat Rec 1999; 255: 407-19.
15. Havenga K, De Ruiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 384-8.
16. O'Connell HE, Hutson JM, Anderson CR, Plenter RJ. Anatomical relationship between urethra and clitoris. J Urol 1998; 159: 1892-7.
17. Jones OM, Smeulders N, Wiseman O, Miller R. Lateral ligaments of the rectum: an anatomical study. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 487-9.
18. Barton DP, Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP, Polak JM. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12: 319 (letter).
19. Fritsch H. Topography of the pelvic autonomic nerves in human fetuses between 21 and 29 weeks of gestation. Anat Embryol 1989; 180: 57-64.
20. Forney JP. Effect of radical hysterectomy on bladder physiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 374-8.
21. Sakamoto S, Takazawa K. An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications and with no loss of therapeutic results for cervical cancer. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 2: 953-62.
22. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Kitamura S. Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 7-14.
23. Donker PJ. A study of the myelinated fibers in the branches of the pelvic plexus. Neurol Urodyn 1986; 5: 185-202.
24. Tong X, Huo R. The anatomical basis and prevention of neurogenic voiding dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 1991; 13: 145-8.
25. Kenter GG, Heintz AP. Surgical treatment of low stage cervical carcinoma: back to the old days? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12: 429-34.