Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A pilot study

Tumori

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 497-501

  Raspagliesi, Francesco ^a   Ditto, Antonino ^a   Kusamura, Shigeki ^a   Fontanelli, Rosanna ^a   Spatti, Gianbattista ^a   Solima, Eugenio ^a   Zanaboni, Flavia ^a   Carcangiu, Maria L ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bladder function; Nerve sparing; Neuroanatomy; Radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; BLADDER DYSFUNCTION; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CATHETERIZATION; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; LYMPHADENECTOMY; NERVE SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; NEUROANATOMY; PILOT STUDY; PIVER III HYSTERECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0347627452     PISSN: 03008916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030089160308900507     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hellebrekers BWJ, Zwinderman AH, Kenter GG, Peters AA, Snijders-Keilholz A, Graziosi GC, Fleuren GJ, Trimbos JB: Surgically treated early cervical cancer: prognostic factors and the significance of depth of tumor invasion. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 9: 212-219, 1999.
2. Sevin BU, Nadji M, Lampe B, Lu Y, Hilsenbeck S, Koechli OR, Averette HE: Prognostic factors of early stage cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy. Cancer, 76 (Suppl 10): 1978-1986, 1995.
3. Lee YN, Wang KL, Lin MH, Liu CH, Wang KG, Lan CC, Chuang JT, Chen AC, Wu CC: Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for treatment of cervical cancer: a clinical review of 954 cases. Gynecol Oncol, 35: 135-142, 1989.
4. Monaghan JM, Ireland D, Shlomo MY, Pearson SE, Lopes A, Sinha DP: Role of centralization of surgery in stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix: a review in 498 cases. Gynecol Oncol, 37: 206-209, 1990.
5. Samlal RA, Van Der Velden J, Van Eerden T, Schilthuis MS, Gonzalez Gonzalez D, Lammes FB: Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: an analysis of clinical aspects and prognosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 8: 78-84, 1998.
6. Trimbos JB, Adema B, Peters AA, Kenter GG, Snijders-Keilholz A: Morbidity and results of 100 radical hysterectomies performed in an oncology center. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 136: 323-327, 1992.
7. Mundy AR: An anatomical explanation for bladder dysfunction following rectal and uterine surgery. Br J Urol, 54: 501-504, 1982.
8. Kadar N, Saliba N, Nelson JH: The frequency, causes and prevention of severe urinary dysfunction after radical hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 90: 858-863, 1983.
9. Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L, Tamussino K: Radicality of parametrial resection and dysfunction of the lower urinary tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 12: 27-30, 1991.
10. Barton DP, Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP, Polak JM: A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 12: 319, 2002.
11. Maas K, Moriya Y, Kenter G, Trimbos B, van de Velde C: A plea for preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves. Lancet, 354: 772-773, 1999.
12. Havenga K, Maas CP, DeRuiter MC, Welvaart K, Trimbos JB: Avoiding long-term disturbance to bladder and sexual function in pelvic surgery, particularly with rectal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol, 18: 235-243, 2000.
13. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Kitamura S: Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 164: 7-14, 1991.
14. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Satou N: A new proposal for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 62: 370-378, 1996.
15. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y, Nakajima T: Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol, 77: 155-163, 2000.
16. Hockel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CP: Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 178: 971-976, 1998.
17. Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A: Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol, 79: 154-157, 2000.
18. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG: A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 11: 180-186, 2001.
19. Querleu D, Narducci F, Poulard V, Lacaze S, Occelli B, Leblanc E, Cosson M: Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol Oncol, 85: 154-158, 2002.
20. Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP, Polak JM, Barton DP: Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: the nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments. Cancer, 89: 834-841, 2000.
21. Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP, Polak JM, Barton DP: Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the uterine supporting ligaments. J Soc Gynecol Invest, 9: 47-56, 2002.
22. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, D'Andrea G, Cutillo G, Rabitti C, Congiu M, Coronetta F, Capelli A: Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study. Cancer, 88: 2267-2274, 2000.
23. Oosterhuis JW, Lung PF, Verschueren RC, Oldhoff J: Viability of tumor cells in the irrigation fluid of the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) after tumor fragmentation. Cancer, 56: 368-370, 1985.