CarboMedics mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis - Performance in patients aged 60 years and older after 15 years

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 195-199

  Benhameid, O ^a   Jamieson, W R Eric ^a   Castella, M ^b   Carrier, M ^c   Pomar, J L ^b   Germann, E ^a   Pellerin, M ^c   Brownlee, R T ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c MONTREAL HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aortic disease; Cardiovascular surgery; Heart disease; Heart valve surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION;

EID: 45549093470     PISSN: 01716425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038385     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ionescu MI, Tandon AP, Mary DAS, Abid A. Heart valve replacement with lonescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73: 31-42
2. Jamieson WRE, Janusz MT, MacNab J, Henderson C. Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (Suppl 5): S282-S284
3. Franzen S, Nylander E, Olin C. Aortic valve replacement with pericardial valves in patients with small aortic roots. Clinical results in a consecutive series of patients receiving 19 and 21 mm prostheses. Scand Cardiovasc J 2001; 35: 114-118
4. Pomar JL, Jamieson WRE, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Castella M, Brownlee RT. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: clinical performance to ten years. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: S305-S310
5. Mazzucotelli JP, Bertrand PC, Loisance DY. The Mitroflow pericardial valve: clinical performance to ten years. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4: 407-413
6. Minami K, Schereika S, Kortke H, Gleichmann U, Korfer R. Long term follow up of Mitroflow pericardial valve bioprosthesis in the small aortic annulus. J Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 34: 189-193
7. Pomar JL, Jamieson WRE, Pelletier L, Castella M, Germann E, Brownlee RT. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement ≥60 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S53-S56
8. Edmunds LH, Richard E, Lawrence H, Gary L, Miller DC, Richard D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 932-935
9. Yankah C, Schubel J, Buz S, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Seventeen year clinical results of 1037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14: 172-180
10. Thulin LI, Thielen UJ, Kymie KAF. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Low incidence of structural valve deterioration in elderly patients during a 11-year follow-up. Scand Cardiovasc J 2000; 34: 192-196
11. Minami K, Zittermann A, Schulte-Eistrup S, Koertke H, Korfer R. Mitroflow synergy prostheses for aortic valve replacement: 19 years experience with 1516 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1699-1705
12. Minami K, Boethig D, Mirow N, Kleikamp G, Koertke H, Godehardt E, Koerfer R. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 112-122
13. Jamieson WRE, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E et al. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 994-1000
14. Gonzalez J, Garcia B, Garcia A, Vega Fernandez M, Amaro Cendon A, Varela Roman A, Gil de la Pena M. The influence of the design on the medium to long-term hemodynamic behavior of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5 (Suppl 3): S317-S323
15. Gonzalez J, Garcia B, Garcia A, Vega Fernandez M, Amaro Cendon A, Castelo Fuentes V, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, Gil de la Pena M. Hemodynamics of various designs of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10: 201-206
16. Jamieson WRE, Germann E, Aupart MR, Neville PH, Marchand MA, Fradet GJ. 15-year comparison of supra-annular porcine and perimount aortic bioprostheses. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Annals 2006; 14: 200-205
17. Yankah C, Minami K, Zittermann A, Stein J, Koertke H, Siniawski H, Koerfer R, Hetzer R. Two institutional clinical results of Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprostheses in 3029 patients: Twenty-year experience (including personal communication). Society for Heart Valve Disease 2007: presentation