High order central scheme on overlapping cells for magneto-hydrodynamic flows with and without constrained transport method

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 227, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 7368-7393

  Li, Shengtai ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central schemes; Constrained transport (CT); Divergence free reconstruction; High order; Magneto hydrodynamics (MHD); Non oscillatory; Overlapping cell

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

CENTRAL SCHEME; CONSTRAINED TRANSPORT; CONSTRAINED TRANSPORTS; DIVERGENCE FREE; DIVERGENCE-FREE RECONSTRUCTION; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; MAGNETO HYDRODYNAMICS; MAGNETO-HYDRODYNAMIC; NON-OSCILLATORY; OVERLAPPING CELLS;

ELECTRIC FIELDS;

EID: 45449115720     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Balbás J., and Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central schemes for one- and two-dimensional MHD equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 2 (2006) 533-560
2. Balbás J., Tadmor E., and Wu C.-C. Non-oscillatory central schemes for one- and two-dimensional MHD equations: I. J. Comput. Phys. 201 (2004) 261-285
3. Balsara D.S., and Spicer D.S. A staggered mesh algorithm using high order Godunov fluxes to ensure solenoidal magnetic field in magnetohydrodynamics simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 149 (1999) 270-292
4. Balsara D.S. Divergence-free adaptive mesh refinement for magneto-hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 174 (2001) 614-648
5. Balsara D.S. Second order accurate schemes for magneto-hydrodynamics with divergence-free reconstruction. ApJ. Suppl. 151 (2004) 149-184
6. Balsara D.S., and Kim J.S. A comparison between divergence-cleaning and staggered-mesh formulation for numerical MHD. ApJ 602 (2004) 1079
7. Barth T.J. On the role of involutions in the discontinuous Galerkin discretization of Maxwell and magneto-hydrodynamics systems. In: Arnold D.N., Bochev P.B., Lehoucq R.B., Nicolaides R.A., and Shashkov M. (Eds). Compatible Spatial Discretizations. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications vol. 142 (2007), Springer-Verlag, New York 69-88
8. Brackbill J.U., and Barnes D.C. The effect of nonzero ∇ · B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 35 (1980) 426
9. Brio M., and Wu C.C. An upwinding differencing schemes for the equations for ideal Magneto-hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 75 (1988) 400
10. Dai W., and Woodward P.R. A simple finite difference scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 142 (1998) 331-369
11. Dedner A., Kemm F., Kroner D., Munz C.D., Schnitzer T., and Wesenberg M. Hyperbolic divergence-cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys. 175 (2002) 645
12. Gardiner T.A., and Stone J.M. An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport. J. Comput. Phys. 205 (2005) 509-539
13. Jiang G.S., and Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central schemes for multi-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19 (1998) 1892-1917
14. Jiang G.S., and Wu C.-C. A high-order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal Magneto-hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 150 (1999) 561-594
15. Levy D., Puppo G., and Russo G. A third order central WENO scheme for 2D conservation laws. Appl. Numer. Math. 33 (2000) 407-414
16. S. Li, H. Li, A modern code for solving magnetohydrodynamics or hydrodynamic equations, Technical Report LA-UR-03-8925, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2003.
17. Liu Y. Central schemes on overlapping cells. J. Comput. Phys. 209 (2005) 82-104
18. Liu Y., Shu C.-W., Tadmor E., and Zhang M. Non-oscillatory hierarchical reconstruction for central and finite-volume schemes. Commun. Comput. Phys. 2 (2007) 933-963
19. Liu X.D., and Tadmor E. Third order nonoscillatory central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. Numer. Math. 79 (1998) 397-425
20. Liu X.D., and Osher S. Convex ENO high order multi-dimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered grid. J. Comput. Phys. 141 (1998) 1-27
21. Londrillo P., and Del Zanna L. High-order upwinding schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 530 (2000) 508
22. Londrillo P., and Del Zanna L. On the divergence-free condition in Godunov-type schemes for ideal magneto-hydrodynamics: the upwinding constrained transport method. J. Comput. Phys. 195 (2004) 17-48
23. Nessyahu H., and Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87 (1990) 408-463
24. K.G. Powell, An approximate Riemann solver for MHD (that actually works in more than one dimension), Technical Report N0. 94-24, ICASE, Langley VA, 1994.
25. Qiu J., and Shu C.-W. On the construction, comparison, and local characteristic decomposition for high-order central WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 183 (2002) 187-209
26. Rossmanith J. An unstaggered high resolution constrained transport method for magneto-hydrodynamic flow. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2006) 1766-1797
27. Ryu D., Miniati F., Jones T.W., and Frank A. A divergence-free upwinding code for multi-dimensional MHD flows. Astrophys. J. 509 (1998) 244-255
28. Shu C.W., and Osher S.J. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 83 (1989) 32-78
29. Tóth G. The ∇ · B = 0 constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes. J. Comput. Phys. 161 (2000) 605-652
30. Tóth G., and Roe P.L. Divergence- and curl-preserving prolongation and restriction formulas. J. Comput. Phys. 180 (2002) 736-750
31. Woodward P.R., and Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54 (1984) 115-173
32. Ziegler U. A central-constrained transport scheme for ideal magneto-hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 196 (2004) 393-416