A High-Order WENO Finite Difference Scheme for the Equations of Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 150, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 561-594

  Jiang, Guang Shan ^a   Wu, Cheng Chin ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Essentially non oscillatory scheme; Magnetohydrodynamics

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY; ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY SCHEMES; FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER ORDER ACCURACY; HIGHER-ORDER; HYDRODYNAMIC PROBLEMS; IDEAL MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; SPATIAL DIMENSION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL;

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

EID: 0001116632     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6207     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aslan N. Numerical solutions of one-dimensional MHD equations by a fluctuation approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 22:1996;569.
2. Brackbill J. U., Barnes D. C. The effect of nonzero div B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 35:1980;426.
3. Brio M., Wu C. C. Characteristic fields for the equations of magnetohydrodynamics. Nonstrictly Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. 1987;19.
4. Brio M., Wu C. C. An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 75:1988;400.
5. Clarke D. A., Norman M. L., Burn J. O. Numerical simulations of a magnetically confined jet. Ap. J. 311:1986;L63.
6. Dahlburg R. B., Picone J. M. Evolution of the Orszag-Tang vortex system in a compressible medium. I. Initial average subsonic flow. Phys. Fluids B. 1:1989;2153.
7. Dai W., Woodward P. R. A high-order Godunov-type scheme for shock interactions in ideal magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18:1997;957.
8. Dai W., Woodward P. R. A simple finite difference scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamical equations. J. Comput. Phys. 142:1998;331.
9. Evans C. R., Hawley J. F. Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows: A constrained transport method. Ap. J. 332:1988;659.
10. de Fainchtein R., Zalesak S. T., Löhner R., Spicer D. S. Finite element simulation of a turbulent MHD system: Comparison to a pseudo-spectral simulation. Comput. Phys. Comm. 86:1995;25.
11. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49:1983;357.
12. Harten A., Engquist B., Osher S., Chakravarthy S. Uniformly high-order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71:1987;231.
13. Jeffrey A., Taniuti T. Non-linear Wave Propagation. 1964.
14. Jiang G.-S., Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126:1996;202.
15. Kennel C. F., Blandford R. D., Wu C. C. Structure and evolution of small-amplitude intermediate shock waves. Phys. Fluids B. 2:1990;253.
16. Liu X.-D., Lax P. D. Positive schemes for solving multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. J. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 5:1996;133.
17. Liu X.-D., Osher S., Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115:1994;200.
18. Orszag S. A., Tang C. M. Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. J. Fluid. Mech. 90:1979;129.
19. Picone J. M., Dahlburg R. B. Evolution of the Orszag-Tang vortex system in a compressible medium. II. Supersonic flow. Phys. Fluids B. 3:1991;29.
20. K. G. Powell, P. L. Roe, R. S. Myong, T. Gombosi, D. de Zeeuw, An upwind scheme for magnetohydrodynamics, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 19-22, 1995, 661.
21. Roe P. L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43:1981;357.
22. Roe P. L., Balsara D. S. Notes on the eigensystem of magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 56:1986;57.
23. Ryu D., Jones T. W. Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: Algorithm and tests for one-dimensional flow. Ap. J. 442:1995;228.
24. Ryu D., Jones T. W., Frank A. Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: Algorithm and tests for multidimensional flow. Ap. J. 452:1995;785.
25. Shu C.-W. Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 9:1988;1073.
26. Shu C.-W. Essentially Non-oscillatory and Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. 1997.
27. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83:1989;32.
28. Sod G. A. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27:1978;1.
29. Tanaka T. Generation mechanisms for magnetosphere-ionosphere current systems deduced from a three-dimensional MHD simulation of the solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling processes. J. Geophys. Res. 100:1995;12,057.
30. C. C. Wu, Global MHD Model of the Earth's magnetosphere, Solar Terrestrial Physics, Principles and Theoretical Foundations, R. L. CarovillanoJ. M. Forbes, Reidel, Dordrecht, l983, 369.
31. Wu C. C. Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetopause boundary. J. Geophys. Res. 91:1986;3042.
32. Wu C. C. On MHD intermediate shocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14:1987;668.
33. Wu C. C. Formation, structure, and stability of MHD intermediate shocks. J. Geophys. Res. 95:1990;8149.
34. Wu C. C. Magnetohydrodynamic Riemann problem and the structure of the magnetic reconnection layer. J. Geophys. Res. 100:1995;5579.
35. Xu S., Aslam T., Stewart D. High resolution numerical simulation of ideal and non-ideal compressible reacting flows with embedded internal boundaries. Combustion Theory Model. 1:1997;113.
36. Zachary A. L., Malagoli A., Colella P. A higher-order Godunov method for multi-dimensional ideal magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15:1994;263.