Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: State-of-the-art review

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 89-104

  Gilchrist, Andrew ^a   Allouche, Erez N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Construction; Environmental impacts; Evaluation method; Social cost; Valuation techniques

Indexed keywords

CONTRACTS; COSTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; PREFABRICATED CONSTRUCTION; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TUNNELS; UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES; URBAN PLANNING;

CONSRUCTION PROJECTS; CURRENT BID EVALUATION METHOD; SOCIAL COST QUANTIFICATION;

TUNNELING (EXCAVATION);

CONSTRUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; SOCIAL IMPACT;

EID: 4544372928     PISSN: 08867798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2004.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allouche E.N. Ariaratnam S.T. AbouRizk S.M. Multi-Dimensional Utility Model for Selection of a Trenchless Construction Method. Proceedings Construction Congress VI, February 20-22 2000 ASCE Orlando, FL 543-553
2. Augenbroe G. Pearce A. 1998. Sustainable construction in the USA; A perspective to the year 2010. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction. CIB-W82 Report, June
3. AWWA 2000. Costs of infrastructure failure. Grand central spreadsheet. Beta Test Version, July 20. AWWA Research Foundation Project 2607
4. AYC 2003. Always Your Choice. Mental Illness, Road Rage. Available from: http://alwaysyourchoice.com/ayc/emotional/mental/roadrage.php Visited February 28, 2003
5. Bein P. 1997. Monetization of Environmental Impacts of Roads. Ministry of Transportation, Highway Planning and Policy Branch, British Columbia, Canada
6. Boyce G. Bried E. 1998. Social Cost Accounting for Trenchless Projects. North American No-Dig '98, Session 1A-1, 2-12
7. Budhu G. Iseley D.T. 1994. The Economics of Trenchless vs. the Traditional Cut and Fill in High-Density-Activity Urban Corridors. No-Dig '94, Session A. Dallas, TX, A2:1, A2:18
8. Campbell B. Humphrey T.F. 1988. Methods of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Highway Projects. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). Synthesis 142. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA
9. Canadian Innovation Centre, 2002. Industry Cost/Benefit Analysis for Subsurface Utility Damage. File BEN202A020, March 12
10. Deluchi M.A. The social cost of motor vehicle use The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 553 September 1997
11. Diab, Y.G., 2002. A method to select a rehabilitation technique for an urban storm and wastewater system. In: Proceedings of the INFRA-2002 Conference, Montreal, Canada, 10 pp (on CD-ROM)
12. Environmental Sciences, 2002. Environmental Economic Valuation Techniques. Griffith University, Workshop Topic 6, Griffith, Australia
13. Gilchrist, A., Allouche E.N., Cowan, D., 2004. Prediction and mitigation of construction noise in urban environments. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering CSCE (In press)
14. Gokhale S. Makarand H. Abraham C. A Decision Model for the Evaluation of Options for Sewer Pipeline Installation: Microtunneling Case Study. Proceedings of the No-Dig 2000 Conference 2000 Anaheim California Section 1B, 59-74
15. Goldman T.A. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. New Approaches in Decision Making 1967 Frederick A. Praeger New York, USA
16. Habibian, A., Man, A., Wong, K., 2002. Rehabilitation of water mains in Hong Kong. In: Conference Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Pipeline Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA. Track 3 - Period 9
17. Heiber G. Sustainable Building Technical Manual 1996 US Department of Energy and US Environment Protection Agency, Publish Technology Inc.
18. Herbsman Z.J. A+B bidding method-hidden success story for highway construction Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 121 4 1995 430-437
19. Herbsman Z. Ellis R. Multiparameter bidding system - innovation in contract administration Journal of Construction and Management. 118 1 1992 142-150
20. Ioannou P. Leu S. Average bid method - competitive bidding strategy Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 119 1 1993 131-147
21. Levinson, D., Gillen, D., Kanafani, A., Mathieu, J., 1996. The Full Cost of Intercity Transportation. University of California, Berkley, UCB-ITS-RR-96-3
22. Main Roads Western Australia, 2002. Property Damage and Nuisance Specification. Visited January 30, 2003. Available from: http://www.mainroads.wa.org.au/mrwa/run/start.asp
23. McKim R. Bidding strategies for conventional and trenchless technologies considering social costs Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 24 5 1997 819-827
24. Premier Pipe Ltd., 2002. Case Histories of Premier Pipe in Action. Visited July 22, 2002. Available from: http://www.premierpipe.com
25. Salvo, P., Willmets, M., 2002. Case study -two watermain rehabilitation techniques on one project - City of Ottawa. In: Conference Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Pipeline Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA. Track 3 - Period 9
26. Sauer G. Urban Tunnelling Consequences. World Tunnelling 1998 The Mining Journal Ltd. London, UK March, pp. 92-98
27. Schexnayder, C., Ernzen, J., 1999. Mitigation of Nighttime Construction Noise, Vibrations and other Nuisances. NCHRP Synthesis 218, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
28. Sorenson, J., Terry, E., Mathis, D., 1998. Maintaining the Customer-Driven Highway. Public Roads, vol. 62, No. 3. US Department of Transportation, November/December
29. Starky D.N.M. The Economic Value of Peace and Quiet 1975 Lexington Books Lexington, MA
30. Sterling L.R. Indirect Cost of Utility Replacements and Repairs Beneath Streets 1994 Minnesota Department of Transportation St. Paul, MN
31. Thalheimer E. Construction noise control program and mitigation strategy at the central artery/tunnel project Noise Control Engineering Journal 48 5 2000 157-165
32. Thomson, J., 2000. Worldwide experience and best practices with trenchless construction. Social Costs and Modern Contract Practices: A Summary Report of the 2000 Life Extension Technologies Forum, Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems, June 29, New York, USA
33. Tighe S. Knight M. Papoutsis D. Rodriguez V. Walker C. User cost savings in eliminating pavement excavations through employing trenchless technologies Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 29 2002 751-761
34. Tighe S. Lee T. McKim R. Haas R. Traffic delay cost savings associated with trenchless technology Journal of Infrastructure Systems 5 2 1999 45-52
35. Townley P. Principles of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Canadian Context 1998 Prentice-Hall Scarborough, Ont
36. Troe W. Development and Implementation of a Process for Reconciling Subarea Macro and Micro Scale Modeling Applications. Proceedings of the Mid-Continent Transportation Symposium. Center of Transportation Research and Education 2000 Iowa State University USA
37. Tsunokawa, K., Hoban, C., 1997. Roads and the Environment: A Handbook. World Bank Technical Paper No. 376. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA
38. Utah Technology Transfer Center, 2002. Lane Rental Best Practices Guide, November 2002. Innovative Contracting Homepage. Available from: http://www.ic.usu.edu
39. Vanegas, J.A., DuBose, J.R., Pearce, A.R., 1996. Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Design for the Global Environment, Atlanta, Georgia, November 2-4
40. Watkins, L.H., 1980. Some research into the environmental impact of roads and traffic, transport research for social and economic progress. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Transport Research
41. Watts, G.R., 1990. Traffic induced vibrations in buildings. Research Report 246, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England