Ecotoxicity test data for total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil: Plants and soil-dwelling invertebrates

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 207-231

  Efroymson, Rebecca A ^a   Sample, Bradley E ^a,b   Peterson, Mark J ^a  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CH2M HILL   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Ecotoxicity; Petroleum; Phytotoxicity; Soil invertebrate; TPH

Indexed keywords

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 4544278791     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030490438175     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Adam G and Duncan HJ. 1999. Effect of diesel fuel on growth of selected plant species. Environ Geochem Health 21:353-7
2. Amadi A, Dickson AA, and Maate GO. 1993. Remediation of oil polluted soils: 1. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient supplements on the performance of maize (Zea mays L.). Water Air Soil Pollut 66:59-76
3. API (American Petroleum Institute). 1997a. Environmental Guidance Document: Waste Management in Exploration and Production Operations. API E5. Second Edition. Washington, DC, USA
4. API (American Petroleum Institute). 1997b. Remediation of Salt-Affected Soils at Oil and Gas Production Facilities. API Publication Number 4663. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, USA
5. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1999. Toxicological Profile for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, USA
6. Bernstein L. 1964. Salt Tolerance of Plants. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 283. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA
7. Booth PN and Jacobson MA. 1998. Development of cleanup standards at Superfund sites: An evaluation of consistency. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2:762-6
8. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). 1996. A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guidelines. CCME-EPC-101E. The National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
9. CCME. 2000. Canada-Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Phcs) in Soil: Scientific Rationale. Supporting Technical Document. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg, MN, Canada
10. Chaîneau CH, Morel JL, and Oudot J. 1997. Phytotoxicity and plant uptake of fuel oil hydrocarbons. J Environ Qual 26:1478-83
11. de Jong E. 1980. The effect of a crude oil spill on cereals. Environ Pollut 22:187-96
12. Deuel LE Jr. 1991. Evaluation of Limiting Constituents Suggested for Land Disposal of Exploration and Production Wastes. API Publication Number 4527. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, USA
13. Dorn PB and Salanitro JP. 2000. Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation. Chemosphere 40:419-26
14. Dorn PB, Vipond TE, Salanitro JP, et al. 1998. Assessment of the acute toxicity of crude oils using earthworms, Microtox, and plants. Chemosphere 37:845-60
15. Efroymson RA, Will ME, and Suter GW II. 1997a. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Potential Contaminants of Concern for Effects on Soil and Litter Invertebrates and Heterotrophic Process: 1997 Revision. ES/ER/TM-126/R2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
16. Efroymson RA, Will ME, Suter GW II, et al. 1997b. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Potential Contaminants of Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision. ES/ER/TM-85/R2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
17. Efroymson RA, Nicolette JP, and Suter GW II. 2003. A framework for net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of petroleum-contaminated sites. ORNL/TM-2003/17. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
18. Efroymson RA, Nicolette JP, and Suter GW II. In review. Net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of contaminated sites. Environ Manage
19. Franken ROG, Baars AJ, Crommentuijn GH, et al. 1999. A Proposal for Revised Intervention Values for Petroleum Hydrocarbons ('Minerale Olie') on Base of Fractions of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. RIVM Report 711701015. Rijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid En Milieu (RIVM). National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
20. Green BT, Wiberg CT, Woodruff JL, et al. 1996. Phytotoxicity observed in Tradescantia correlates with diesel fuel contamination in soil. Environ Exper Bot 36:313-21
21. Hamilton WA, Sewell HJ, and Deeley G. 1999. Technical basis for current soil management levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons. In: Sublette KL (ed), Proceedings, 6th International Petroleum Environmental Conference, Houston, TX, November 16-18, 1999. Integrated Petroleum Environmental Consortium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. Available at http://ipec.utulsa.edu/Ipec/Conf/6thIPEC.pdf
22. Holt S. 1987. The effects of crude and diesel oil spills on plant communities at Mesters Vig, Northeast Greenland. Arctic Alpine Res 19:490-7
23. Hou, FSL, Leung DWM, Milke MW, et al. 1999. Improvement in ryegrass seed germination for diesel contaminated soils by PEG treatment technology. Environ Technol 20:413-8
24. Kapustka LA. 1997. Selection of phytotoxicity tests for use in ecological risk assessments. In: Wang W, Gorsuch JW, and Hughes JS (eds), Plants for Environmental Studies, pp 515-48. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA
25. Kapustka L. 2004. Do PAHs pose unacceptable ecological risks to terrestrial receptors at hazardous waste sites? Hum Ecol Risk Assess (this issue)
26. Kuhn W, Gambino R, Nader A, et al. 1998. Growth of tomato plants in soil contaminated with Kuwait crude oil. J Soil Contam 7:801-6
27. Lillie TH and Bartine RW. 1990. Protocol for evaluating soil contaminated with fuel or herbicide. In: Wang W, Gorsuch JW, and Lower WR (eds), Plants for Toxicity Assessment, pp 198-203. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA
28. Marwood TM, Knoke K, Yau K, et al. 1998. Comparison of toxicity detected by five bioassays during bioremediation of diesel fuel-spiked soils. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 13:117-26
29. Miller RW, Honarvar S, and Hunsaker B. 1980. Effects of drilling fluids on soils and plants: I. Individual fluid components. J Environ Qual 9:547-52
30. Overcash MR and Pal D. 1981. Design of Land Treatment Systems for Industrial Wastes-Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
31. Pirhonen R and Huhta V. 1984. Petroleum fractions in soil: Effects on populations of nematoda, enchytraeidae and microarthropoda. Soil Biol Biochem 16:347-50
32. Racine CH. 1994. Long-term recovery of vegetation on two experimental crude oil spills in interior Alaska black spruce taiga. Can J Bot 72:1171-7
33. Raymond RL, Hudson JO, and Jamison VM. 1976. Oil degradation in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:522-35
34. Renoux AY, Tyagi RD, Roy Y, et al. 1995. Ecotoxicological assessment of bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Microb Processes Biorem 3:259-64
35. Salanitro J. 2001. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Adv Agron 72:53-105
36. Salanitro JP, Dorn PB, Huesemann MH, et al. 1997. Crude oil bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31:1769-76
37. Saterbak A., Toy RJ, McMain BJ, et al. 1998. Assessment of hydrocarbon-impacted soils using ecotoxicity assays. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Remediation Conference and Exposition. November 1998, Houston, TX, pp 525-33. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, USA
38. Saterbak A, Toy RJ, Wong DCL, et al. 1999. Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and application to ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1591-607
39. Saterbak A, Toy RJ, McMain BJ, et al. 2000. Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of effects of bioremediation on hydrocarbon-containing soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2643-52
40. Schwendinger RB. 1968. Reclamation of soil contaminated with oil. J Inst Petrol 54:182-92
41. Seburn DC, Kershaw GP, and Kershaw LJ. 1996. Vegetation response to a subsurface crude oil spill on a subarctic right-of-way, Tulita (Fort Norman), Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic 49:321-7
42. Tonner-Naarro LE, Phelps JL, Roberts SM, et al. 1998. Current risk assessment approaches to address petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures in soils. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4:721-36
43. Twerdok LE. 1999. Development of toxicity criteria for petroleum hydrocarbon fractions in the petroleum hydrocarbon criteria working group approach for risk-based management of total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Drug Chem Toxicol 22:275-91
44. Udo EJ and Fayemi AAA. 1975. The effect of oil pollution of soil on germination, growth and nutrient uptake of corn. J Environ Qual 4:537-40
45. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Ecological Soil Screening Guidance. Draft. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA
46. van Gestel CAM and van Dis WA. 1988. The influence of soil characteristics on the toxicity of four chemicals to the earthworm Eisenia andrei (Oligochaeta). Biol Fertil Soils 6:262-5
47. van Gestel CAM, van der WaardeJJ, Derksen JGM, et al. 2001. The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1438-49
48. Wang X and Bartha R. 1990. Effects of bioremediation on residues, activity and toxicity in soil contaminated by fuel spills. Soil Biol Biochem 22:501-5
49. Wong DCL, Chai EY, Chu KK, et al. 1999. Prediction of ecotoxicity of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils using physicochemical parameters. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2611-21