Prediction of ecotoxicity of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils using physicochemical parameters

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 2611-2621

  Wong, Diana C L ^a   Chai, Eric Y ^a   Chu, Karin K ^a   Dorn, Philip B ^a  

^a SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

Author keywords

Multivariate data analyses; Prediction models; Soil ecotoxicity; Soil physicochemical parameters

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

ARTICLE; CONTAMINATION; EARTHWORM; ECOLOGY; ECOTOXICITY; GERMINATION; HAZARDOUS WASTE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTION;

EID: 0032742581     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620181131     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Edwards DA, et al. 1997. Development of Fraction Specific Reference Doses (RfDs) and Reference Concentrations (RfCs) for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group Series. Vol 4. Amherst Scientific Publishers, Amherst, MA, USA.
2. Athey LA, Thomas JM, Miller WE, Word JQ. 1989. Evaluation of bioassays for designing sediment cleanup strategies at a wood treatment site. Environ Toxicol Chem 8:223-230.
3. Loehr RC, Webster MT. 1997. Effect of treatment on contaminant availability, mobility, and toxicity. In Linz DG, Nakles DV, eds, Environmentally Acceptable Endpoints in Soil: Risk-Based Approach to Contaminated Site Management Based on Availability of Chemicals in Soil. American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Annapolis, MD, pp 137-386.
4. Trudell MR, Marowitch JM, Thomson DG, Fulton CW, Hoffman RE. 1993. In-situ bioremediation at a wood-preserving site in a cold, semi-arid climate: Feasibility and field pilot design. In Hinchee RE, Leeson A, Semprini L, Ong SK, eds, Bioremediation of chlorinated and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA pp 99-116.
5. Vipond TE, Dorn PB, Salanitro JP, Huesemann MH, Wisniewski HL, Moore KO. 1993. An assessment of the toxicity of crude oils in soils using earthworms, Microtox® solid-phase and early plant growth methods. Abstracts, 14th Annual Meeting, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Houston, TX, USA, November 10-14, p 310.
6. Salanitro JP, et al. 1997. Crude oil hydrocarbon bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31:1769-1776.
7. Dorn PB, Vipond TE, Salanitro JP, Wisniewski HL. 1998. Assessment of the acute toxicity of crude oils in soils using earthworms, Microtox®, and plants. Chemosphere 37:845-860.
8. Dorn PB, Salanitro JP. 1999. Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation. Chemosphere (in press).
9. Saterbak A, et al. 1999. Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and application to risk-based corrective action. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1591-1607.
10. Deuel LE Jr, Holliday GH. 1994. Soil Remediation for the Petroleum Extraction Industry. PennWell, Tulsa, OK, USA.
11. SAS Institute. 1994. SAS® Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC, USA.
12. Manugistics. 1994. STATGRAPHICS® Plus Version 7.1. Rockville, MD, USA.
13. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
14. Eriksson L, Hermens JLM, Johansson E, Verhaar JM, Wold S. 1995. Multivariate analysis of aquatic toxicity data with PLS. Aquat Sci 57:217-241.
15. Umetri AB Company. 1996. SIMCA-P, Version 3.0. Umeå, Sweden.
16. Aprill W, Sims RC, Sims JL, Matthews JE. 1990. Assessing detoxification and degradation of wood preserving and petroleum wastes in contaminated soil. Waste Manage Res 8:45-65.
17. Callahan CA, Menzie CA, Burmaster DE, Wilborn DC, Ernst T. 1991. On-site methods for assessing chemical impact on the soil environment using earthworms: A case study at the Baird and McGuire Superfund site, Holbrook, Massachusetts. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:817-826.
18. Griest WH, Stewart AJ, Tyndall RL, Caton JE, Ho CH, Ironside KS, Caldwell WM, Tan E. 1993. Chemical and toxicological testing of composted explosives-contaminated soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1105-1116.
19. Ahlf W, Wild-Metzko S. 1992. Bioassay responses to sediment elutriates and multivariate data analysis for hazard assessment of sediment-bound chemicals. Hydrobiologia 235/236:415-418.
20. Zitko V. 1992. Assessment of the significance of chemicals in sediments. Environ Sci Health A 27:272-281.
21. Clément B, Janssen RC, Le Dû-Delepierre A. 1997. Estimation of the hazard of landfills through toxicity testing of leachates, 2: Comparison of physico-chemical characteristics of landfill leachates with their toxicity determined with a battery of tests. Chemosphere 35:2783-2796.
22. Green RH, Boyd JM, Macdonald JS. 1993. Relating sets of variables in environmental studies: The sediment quality triad as a paradigm. Environmetrics 4:439-457.
23. Maxon CL, Barnett AM, Diener DR. 1997. Sediment contaminants and biological effects in southern California: Use of a multivariate statistical approach to assess biological impact. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:775-784.
24. Roberts C, Fairey R. 1997. Multivariate analyses of chemistry and toxicity conditions in San Diego Bay Region sediments. Abstracts, 18th Annual Meeting, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, San Francisco, CA, USA, November 16-20, pp 246-247.