Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of effects of bioremediation on hydrocarbon-containing soils

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 2643-2652

  Saterbak, Ann ^a   Toy, Robin J ^b   Mcmain, Bruce J ^a   Williams, M Patty ^a   Dorn, Philip B ^a  

^a SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

^b Shell Scenarios Team Shell International Shell Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioremediation; Earthworm; Petroleum hydrocarbons; Soil; Terrestrial ecotoxicity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000214152     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620191105     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. 1996. Guidance for conducting ecological risk assessments under the Texas risk reduction program. Draft version for comment. Office of Waste Management, Austin, TX, USA.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Proposed guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Fed Reg 61:47552-47631.
3. Suedel B, Biddinger GR, DeVaull GE. 1998. Risk based corrective action (RBCA) for protection of ecological resources. Abstracts, 19th Annual Meeting, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Charlotte, NC, USA, November 15-19, p 139.
4. Loehr RC, Malina JF, eds. 1986. Land Treatment: A Hazardous Waste Management Alternative. Water Resources Symposium 13. Center for Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
5. Gibbs MH, Wicker LF, Stewart AJ. 1996. A method for assessing sublethal effects of contaminants in soils to the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:360-368.
6. Salanitro JP, et al. 1997. Crude oil hydrocarbon bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31:1769-1776.
7. Chaineau CH, Morel JL, Oudot J. 1997. Phytotoxicity and plant uptake of fuel oil hydrocarbons. J Environ Qual 26:1478-1483.
8. Wang X, Bartha R. 1990. Effects of bioremediation on residues, activity, and toxicity in soil contaminated by fuel spills. Soil Biol Biochem 22:501-505.
9. ® assay. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 7:497-505.
10. Wang X, Yu X, Bartha R. 1990. Effect of bioremediation on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soil. Environ Sci Technol 24:1086-1089.
11. Linz DG, Nakles DV, eds. 1997. Environmentally Acceptable Endpoints in Soil. Risk-Based Approach to Contaminated Site Management on Availability of Chemicals in Soils. American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Annapolis, MD.
12. Saterbak A, et al. 1999. Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and application to ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1591-1607.
13. Dorn PB, Salanitro JP. 2000. Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation. Chemosphere 40:419-426.
14. Wong DCL, Chai EY, Chu KK, Dorn PB. 1999. Prediction of ecotoxicity of hydrocarbon contaminated soils using physicochemical parameters. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2611-2621.
15. Pope DF, Matthews JE. 1993. Bioremediation using the land treatment concept. EPA 600/R-93/164. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
16. Huesemann MH. 1994. Guidelines for land-treating petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. J Soil Contain 3:299-318.
17. Lawlor K, et al. 1997. Long-term effects of crude oil contamination and bioremediation in a soil ecosystem. Biorem J 1:41-51.
18. Loehr RC, Webster MT. 1996. Performance of long-term, field-scale bioremediation processes. J Hazard Mater 50:105-128.
19. Whittaker M, Pollard SJT. 1997. A performance assessment of source correlation and weathering indices for petroleum hydrocarbons in the environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1149-1158.
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1985. Seed germination/root elongation toxicity test. Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 797, Section 2750. Washington, DC, pp 740-744.
21. p) Approach, Ver 2.0. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA.
22. ® Plus, Ver 7.1. Rockville, MD, USA.
23. Deuel LE, Holliday GH. 1994. Soil Remediation for the Petroleum Extraction Industry. PennWell, Tulsa, OK, USA.
24. Efroymson RA, Will ME, Suter GW. 1997. Toxicological benchmarks for contaminants of potential concern for effects on soil and litter invertebrates and heterotrophic process. ES/ER/TM-126/R2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
25. Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ. 1996. Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
26. Donker MH, Eijsackers H, Heimbach F, eds. 1994. Ecotoxicology of Soil Organisms. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
27. Huesemann MH. 1995. Predictive model for estimating the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 29:7-18.
28. Sugiura K, Ishihara M, Shimauchi T, Harayama S. 1997. Physicochemical properties and biodegradability of crude oil. Environ Sci Technol 31:45-51.
29. Huesemann MH. 1997. Incomplete hydrocarbon biodegradation in contaminated soils: Limitations in bioavailability or inherent recalcitrance? Biorem J 1:27-39.
30. Stewart AJ, Wicker LF, Nazerias MS, Merchant SD, Short DK. 1998. Testing an earthworm test for assessing the biological quality of soils: What works, and why? Abstracts, 19th Annual Meeting, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Charlotte, NC, USA, November 15-18, p 52.
31. Reinecke AJ, Venter JM. 1987. Moisture preferences, growth and reproduction of the compost worm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Biol Fertil Soils 3:135-141.
32. van Gestel CAM, Dirven-van Breeman EM, Baerselman R. 1992. Influence of environmental conditions on the growth and reproduction of the earthworm Eisenia andrei in an artificial soil substrate. Pedobiologia 36:109-120.