Behavioural plasticity-induced changes in drug response. Commentary on Badiani and Robinson Drug-induced neurobehavioral plasticity: The role of environmental context

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 15, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 377-380

  Stephens, D N ^a   Mead, A N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

6 NITRO 7 SULFAMOYLBENZO[F]QUINOXALINE 2,3 DIONE; AMPA RECEPTOR; AMPHETAMINE; COCAINE; METHAMPHETAMINE; PROTEIN C FOS; PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HOME; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROPATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PLACE PREFERENCE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SENSITIZATION;

EID: 4544255686     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200409000-00011     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Badiani A, Robinson TE (2004). Drug-induced neurobehavioral plasticity: the role of environmental context. Behav Pharmacol 15:327-339.
2. Beninger RJ, Miller R (1998). Dopamtne D1-like receptors and reward-related incentive learning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:335-345.
3. Bindra D (1968). Neuropsychological interpretation of the effects of drive and incentive-motivation on general activity and instrumental behavior. Psychol Rev 75:1-22.
4. Brown G, Stephens DN (2002). Effects of cocaine on responding for ethanol or sucrose under a progressive ratio schedule. Behav Pharmacol 13:157-162.
5. Crombag HS, Badiani A, Maren S, Robinson TE (2000). The role of contextual versus discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 116:1-22.
6. Everitt BJ, Cardinal R, Hall J, Parkinson J, Robbins TW (2000). Differential involvement of amygdala subsystems in appetitive conditioning and drug addiction. In: Aggleton J (editor): The Amygdala. New York: Oxford University Press; pp. 353-390.
7. Jones GH, Marsden CA, Robbins TW (1990). Increased sensitivity to amphetamine and reward-related stimuli following social isolation in rats: possible disruption of dopamine-dependent mechanisms of the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 102:364-372.
8. Mead AN, Vasilaki A, Spyraki C, Duka T, Stephens DN (1999). AMPA-receptor involvement in c-fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dissociates neural substrates of conditioned activity and conditioned reward. Eur J Neurosci 11:4089-4098.
9. Mead AN, Katz JL, Rocha BA (2002). Intravenous cocaine-induced activity in A/J and C57BL/6J mice: behavioral sensitization and conditioned activity. Neuropharmacology 42:976-986.
10. Mead AN, Stephens DN (2003a). Involvement of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunits in stimulus-reward learning: evidence from glutamate receptor gria2 knockout mice. J Neurosci 23:9500-9507.
11. Mead AN, Stephens DN (2003b). Selective disruption of stimulus-reward learning in glutamate receptor gria1 knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23:1041-1048.
12. Mead AN, Brown G, Le Merrer J, Stephens DN (2004a). Effects of deletion of gria1 or gria2 genes encoding AMPA receptor subunits on place preference conditioning in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (in press).
13. Mead AN, Crombag HS, Rocha BA (2004b). Sensitization of psychomotor stimulation and conditioned reward in mice: differential modulation by contextual learning. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:249-258.
14. Mendrek A, Blaha CD, Phillips AG (1998). Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 135:416-422.
15. Nestler EJ (2001). Molecular basis of long-term plasticity underlying addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:119-128.
16. Panlilio LV, Schindler CW (1997). Conditioned locomotor-activating and reinforcing effects of discrete stimuli paired with intraperitoneal cocaine. Behav Pharmacol 8:691-698.
17. Parkinson JA, Olmstead MC, Burns LH, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1999). Dissociation in effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core and shell on appetitive pavlovian approach behavior and the potentiation of conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity by D-amphetamine. J Neurosci 19:2401-2411.
18. Pert A, Post R, Weiss SR (1990). Conditioning as a critical determinant of sensitization induced by psychomotor stimulants. NIDA Res Monogr 97:208-241.
19. Pickens R, Dougherty J (1971). Conditioning of the activity effects of drugs. In: Thompson T, Schuster CR (editors): Stimulus Properties of Drugs. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft; pp. 39-50.
20. Pierce RC, Bell K, Duffy P, Kalivas PW (1996). Repeated cocaine augments excitatory amino acid transmission in the nucleus accumbens only in rats having developed behavioral sensitization. J Neurosci 16:1550-1560.
21. Schuster CR, Dockens WS, Woods JH (1966). Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance. Psychopharmacologia 9: 170-182.
22. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J (2003). The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168:3-20.
23. Sheffield FD, Campbell BA (1954). The role of experience in the spontaneous activity of hungry rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47:97-100.
24. Stewart J (1983). Conditioned and unconditioned drug effects in relapse to opiate and stimulant drug self-adminstration. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 7:591-597.
25. Taylor JR, Horger BA (1999). Enhanced responding for conditioned reward produced by intra-accumbens amphetamine is potentiated after cocaine sensitization. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 142:31-40.
26. Tilson HA, Rech RA (1973). Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to D-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149-153.
27. Vezina P (2004). Sensitization of midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity and the self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:827-839.
28. Wyvell CL, Berridge KC (2001). Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered 'wanting' for sucrose reward. J Neurosci 21:7831-7840.