On the margins in a high-performing high school: Policy and the struggling reader

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 466-505

  Franzak, Judith K ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45249096689     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. AGNELLO, M. F. (2001). A postmodern literacy policy analysis. New York: Peter Lang.
2. ALLINGTON, R. L. (1991). Children who find learning to read difficult: School responses to diversity. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives, practices, and policies (pp. 237-252). New York: Teachers College Press.
3. ALVERMANN, D. E. (2001). Reading adolescents' reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 676-690.
4. ALVERMANN, D. E. (2003). Seeing themselves as capable and engaged readers: Adolescents and re/mediated instruction. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
5. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1974). Tradition and reform in the teaching ofEnglish: A history. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
6. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. APPLEBEE, A. N., BURROUGHS, R., & STEVENS, A. S. (2000). Creating continuity and coherence in high school literature curricula. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 396-429.
8. AU, K. H. (2000). A multicultural perspective on policies for improving literacy achievement: Equity and excellence. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 835-851). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. BEERS, K. (2000). Reading skills and strategies: Reaching reluctant readers. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
10. BIANCAROSA, G., & SNOW, C. E. (2004). Reading next - a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
11. BROWN, R. (1991). Policy and the rationalization of schooling. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives, practices, and policies (pp. 217-227). New York. Teachers College Press.
12. CHERLAND, M. R. (1994). Private practices: Girls reading fiction and constructing identity. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
13. CLARKE, J., BOSSANGE, J., ERB, C., GIBSON, D., NELLIGAN, B., SPENCER, C., & SULLIVAN, M. (2000). Dynamics of change in high school teaching. Providence, RI: Brown University.
14. COBURN, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 23, 145-170.
15. COFFEY, A., & ATKINSON, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16. COHEN, D. K., & BALL, D. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 249-256.
17. CRESWELL, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18. DAVIS, D., WITH SPRAKER, J., & KUSHMAN, J. (2004). Improving adolescent reading. Findings from research. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
19. EDMONDSON, J. (2000). America reads: A critical policy analysis. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
20. EDMONDSON, J. (2002). Asking different questions: Critical analyses and reading research. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 113-119.
21. EDMONDSON, J. (2004). Understanding and applying critical policy study. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
22. ERICSON, B. O. (2001). Teaching reading in high school English classes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
23. FLEISCHER, C. (1990). Revitalizing the classroom: Students and teachers researching together. English Journal, 79, 105-06.
24. FRANZAK, J. (2004). Constructing struggling readers: Policy and the experiences of 8th-grade readers. In C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J. V. Hoffman, & D. L. Schallert, (Eds.), 53rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 189-205). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
25. FRANZAK, J. (2006). Zoom: A review of the literature on marginalized adolescent readers, literacy theory, and policy implications. Review of Educational Research, 76, 209-248.
26. FREIRE, P., & MACEDO, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word & the world. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
27. GEE, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: The Falmer Press.
28. GEE, J. P, (2001a). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 714-725.
29. GEE, J. P. (2001b). Reading, language abilities, and semiotic resources: Beyond limited perspectives on reading. In J. Larson (Ed.), Literacy as snake oil: Beyond the quick fix (pp. 7-26). New York: Peter Lang.
30. GOODLAD, J. I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
31. GOODMAN, Y., & OWOCKI, C. (2002). Kidwatching: Documenting children's literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32. GREENLEAF, C. L., SCHOENBACH, R., CZIKO, C., & MUELLER, F. L. (2001). Apprenticing adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 79-129.
33. HECLO, H. (1972). Review article: Policy analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 2, 83-108.
34. HIRSCH, E. D., KETT, J. F., & TREFIL, J. (1988). The dictionary of cultural literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
35. INTERNATIONAL READING ASSOCIATION AND NATIONAL MIDDLE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION (2001). Supporting young adolescents' literacy learning [Position paper]. Retrieved May 27, 2005 from http:// www.reading.org/resources/issues/positions_young_adolescents.html
36. JENNINGS, N. E. (1996). Interpreting policy in real classrooms: Case studies of state reform and teacher practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. MCDANIEL, J. E., & MISKEL, C. G. (2002). The effect of groups and individuals on national decision making: Influence and domination in the reading policy making environment. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
38. MCGILL-FRANZEN, A. (2000). Policy and instruction: What is the relationship? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 889-908). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
39. MELTZER, J., SMITH, N. C., & CLARK, H. (2001). Adolescent literacy resources: Linking research and practice. Providence, RI: The Education Alliance at Brown University.
40. MERRIAM, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. MERRIAM-WEBSTER'S COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY. (2002). (10th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
42. MOJE, E. B. (2000). All the stories that we have: Adolescents' insights about literacy and learning in secondary schools. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
43. MOJE, E. B., PEYTON, J., READENCE, J. E., & MOORE, D. W. (2000). Reinventing adolescent literacy for new times: Perennial and millennial issues. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 400-410.
44. MOORE, J. N. (1998). Street signs: Semiotics, Romeo and Juliet, and young adult literature. Theory into Practice, 37, 210-219.
45. MORGAN, D., SAYLOR-CRAWDER, K., STEPHENS, D., DONNELLY, A., DEFORD, D., & HAMEL, E. (2003). Managing the complexities of a statewide reading initiative. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 139-145.
46. MOSENTHAL, P. B. (1999). Understanding engagement: Historical and political contexts. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading (pp. 1- 16). New York: Teachers College Press.
47. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH COMMISSION ON READING. (2004). A call to action: What we know about adolescent literacy and ways to support teachers in meeting students' needs. Retrieved May 23, 2004, from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/read/ 118622.htm
48. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH. (N.D.). Adolescent and young adult literacy. Retrieved February, 2008 from http:// www.ncte.org/edpolicy/literacy
49. OAKES, J. (1986). Keeping track, part 1: The policy and practice of curriculum inequality. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 12-17.
50. PARSONS, W. (1995). Public policy. An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.
51. PATTON, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52. POWELL, R. (1999). Literacy as a moral imperative: Facing the challenges of a pluralistic society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
53. PRESSLEY, M., DUKE, N. K., & BOLING, E. C. (2004). The educational science and scientifically based instruction we need: Lessons from reading research and policy making. Harvard Educational Review, 74, 30-61.
54. REID, L. (ED.). (2002). Shakespeare for a new age [Themed issue]. English Journal, 92(1).
55. REX, L., & MCEACHEN, D. (1999). "If anything is old, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it's probably important" The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 65-129.
56. ROSE, M. (1990). Lives on the boundary. New York: Penguin.
57. RUTH, L. P. (2003). Who has the power? Policymaking and politics in the English language arts. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 87-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. SCHOENBACH, R., GREENLEAF, C., CZIKO, C., & HURWITZ, L. (1999). Reading for understanding: A guide to improving reading in middle and high school classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. SCHOLES, R. (2001). The crafty reader. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60. SHEPARD, L. A. (1991). Negative policies for dealing with diversity: When does assessment and diagnosis turn into sorting and segregation? In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives, practices, and policies (pp. 279-306). New York: Teachers College Press.
61. SMITH, M. W., & WILHELM, J. D. (2002). "Reading don't fix no Chevys": Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
62. STEVENS, L. P. (2003). Reading First: A critical policy analysis. The Reading Teacher, 56, 662-669.
63. STUCKEY, J. E. (1991). The violence of literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
64. TOVANI, C. (2000). I read it, but I don't get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
65. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (2007a). Striving readers. Retrieved February 7, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/programs/ strivingreaders/index.html
66. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (2007b). Adolescent literacy. Retrieved February 8, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/about /offices/list/ovae/pi/hs/reading.html
67. VACCA, R. T. (2002). From efficient decoders to strategic readers. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 6-11.
68. VALENCIA, S. W., & WIXSON, K. K. (2000). Policy-oriented research on literacy standards and assessment. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 909-935). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.