Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: Verification of the method using MR imaging;Brustvolumenbestimmung anhand der 3-D-oberflächengeometrie: Verifizierung der methode mit hilfe der kernspintomographie

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 112-121

  Eder, Maximilian ^a   Schneider, Armin ^b   Feussner, Hubertus ^b   Zimmermann, Alexander ^b   Höhnke, Christoph ^a   Papadopulos, Nikolaos A ^a   Kovacs, Laszlo ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D imaging; 3D scan; 3D segmentation; Breast; Breast volume; Plastic surgery

Indexed keywords

IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETISM; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEASUREMENTS; MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS; RESONANCE; SCANNING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACES; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

(P ,P ,T) MEASUREMENTS; 3-D SCANNERS; 3-D SURFACE GEOMETRY; 3D SCAN DATA; 3D SURFACES; CURVATURE (SORI); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI); MEAN DEVIATIONS; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MR IMAGING; SCAN MEASUREMENTS; VOLUME QUANTIFICATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PLASTIC SURGERY; THORAX WALL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BREAST; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGAN SIZE; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 45249091669     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2008.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akbas H, Sahin B, Eroglu L, et al. Estimation of breast prosthesis volume by the Cavalieri principle using magnetic resonance images. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28: 275-280.
2. Bouman FG. Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 1970; 23: 263-264.
3. Brown RW, Cheng YC, Kurtay M. A formula for surgical modifications of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1342-1345.
4. Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S. Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 2001; 10: 117-123.
5. Cutting CB, McCarthy JG, Karron DB. Three-dimensional input of body surface data using a laser light scanner. Ann Plast Surg 1988; 21: 38-45.
6. Edelsbrunner H, Mücke E. Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Transaction on Graphics 1994; 13: 43-72.
7. Eder M, Papadopoulos NA, Kovacs L. Breast volume determination in breast Hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 356-367.
8. Eder M, Papadopoulos NA, Kovacs L. Re: Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 563-565.
9. Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G. Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996; 30: 129-132.
10. Falcao AX, Udupa JK. Segmentation of 3D objects using live-wire. SPIE on Medical Imaging 1997; 3034: 191-198.
11. Fowler PA, Casey CE, Cameron GG, Foster MA, Knight CH. Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 595-602.
12. Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 58-70.
13. Grossman AJ, Roudner LA. A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66: 851-852.
14. Hudson DA. Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52: 15-21.
15. Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 1643-1649.
16. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, et al. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57: 602-610.
17. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 2007; 161: 137-145.
18. Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E. Re: Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55: 695-696.
19. Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A, et al. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 229-236.
20. Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, et al. Accuracy and precision of the three-dimensional assessment of the facial surface using a 3-D laser scanner. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25: 742-754.
21. Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, et al. Three-dimensional recording of the human face with a 3D laser scanner. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 1193-1202.
22. Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E. Re: factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 192-194.
23. Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 471-476.
24. Malini S, Smith EO, Goldzieher JW. Measurement of breast volume by ultrasound during normal menstrual cycles and with oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 538-541.
25. Mineyev M, Kramer D, Kaufman L, Carlson J, Frankel S. Measurement of breast implant volume with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 34: 348-351.
26. Moor EV, Westreich M, Bar-Ziv Y, Wexler MR. Derivation of final implant volume for breast reconstruction using three dimensional CT scan. Eur J Plast Surg 2000; 23: 138-141.
27. Mortensen EN, Morse BS, Barrett WA. Adaptive boundary detection using 'live-wire' two-dimensional dynamic programming. IEEE Proc. Computers in Cardiology 1992; 635-638.
28. Nahabedian MY, Galdino G. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 1582-1590.
29. Schenk A, Prause G, Peitgen HO. Local cost computation for efficient segmentation of 3D objects with live wire. Medical Imaging 2001: Image Processing, Proceedings of SPIE 2001; 4332: 1357-1364.
30. Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE. Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78: 331-335.
31. Tebbetts JB. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1396-1409.
32. Udupa JK, Samarasekera S, Barrett WA. Boundary detection via dynamic programming. Visualization in Biomedical Computing 1992; 92: 33-39.