Factors Determining Shape and Symmetry in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-21

  Hudson, Donald A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST REDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIOLOGY; RANK SUM TEST; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; SKIN GRAFT; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0346964566     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000099962.79156.16     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Spear SL, Spittler CJ. Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:177-187.
2. Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autologous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 1998;102:63-70.
3. Skoll PJ, Hudson DA. Skin-sparing mastectomy using a modified Wise pattern. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 2002;110:214-217.
4. Hammond DC, Capraro PA, Ozolins EB, et al. Use of skin-sparing reduction pattern to create a combination skin-muscle flap pocket in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 2002;110:206-213.
5. Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R, et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:686-691.
6. Georgiade G, Georgiade N, McCarty KS, et al. Rationale for immediate reconstruction of the breast following modified radical mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 1982;8:20-28.
7. Noone RB, Frazier TG, Noone GC, et al. Recurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate breast reconstruction: a 13 year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:96-106.
8. Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncological and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225:570-578.
9. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6 year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:421-425
10. Carlson GW. Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg. 1996;62:151-155.
11. Francel TJ, Ryan JJ, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction utilising implants: a local experience and comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:786-794.
12. Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:455-462.
13. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction 11. TRAM flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1710-1716.
14. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1702-1709.
15. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;106:769-776.
16. Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncological risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:49-62.
17. Hudson DA. Autologous anatomical implant. Molding the latissimus dorsi flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:248-251.
18. Hudson DA. Some thoughts on choosing a technique in breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:554-557.
19. Baeke JL. Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2555-2567.
20. Maylon AD, Husein M, Weiler-Mithoff EM. How many procedures to make a breast? Br J Plast Surgg. 2001;54:227-231.