The promise of Wisconsin's 1999 comprehensive planning law: Land-use policy reforms to support active living

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 455-496

  Schilling, Joseph ^a   Keyes, Sheila D ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; COMMUNITY LIVING; ENVIRONMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; LAND USE; LAW; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POLICY; POLITICS; POPULATION GROWTH; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

CITY PLANNING; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; EXERCISE; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LIFE STYLE; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; POLICY MAKING; WISCONSIN;

EID: 45149110273     PISSN: 03616878     EISSN: 15271927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2008-005     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Abrahamson, S. S. 2005. Land Use Law in the Courts - One Judge's Observations. In Planning Reform in a New Century, ed. Daniel R. Mandelker, 251-259. Chicago: American Planning Association.
2. Adam, S., and H. Kriesi. 2007. The Network Approach. In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed., ed. Paul Sabatier, 129-154. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Alterman, R. 2005 A View from the Outside - The Role of Cross-National Learning in the Land-Use Law Reforms in the U.S. In Planning Reform in a New Century, ed. Daniel R. Mandelker, 304-320. Chicago: American Planning Association.
4. Anti-government.com. n.d. The Posse Comitatus. www.anti-government.com/ posse-comitatus.htm (accessed December 18, 2007).
5. Bardach, E. 2005. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
6. Behnke, D. 2003. Smart Growth in Neenah like TV's Mayberry. Post-Crescent (Appleton, WI), February 10.
7. Beloit Daily News. 2005. Editorial: Need for Balance Between Wisconsin's Smart Growth Law Proponents and Critics. May 13.
8. Booher, D. E., and J. Innes. 2002. Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:221-236.
9. Brunner, R. D. 1997. Introduction to the Policy Sciences. Policy Sciences 30 (4):191-215.
10. Callender, D. 2005. Legislators Put Smart Growth Law on State Chopping Block. Capital Times (Madison), May 17.
11. Cole, J. 2003. Supervisors Are Wary, but Keep Land Use Plan. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, February 4.
12. Dane County Better Infill Development Program (BUILD) and 1000 Friends of Wisconsin. 2006. Great Neighborhoods: How to Bring Them Home. www.1kfriends.org/Community_Planning/Great_Neighborhoods.htm (accessed December 18, 2007).
13. Downs, A. 2001. What Does Smart Growth Really Mean? Planning Magazine, April, 20-25.
14. Durkin, P. 2005. Why Wisconsin's Smart Growth Program Needed Rescue? Green Bay Press-Gazette, July 21.
15. Editorial Board. 2002. Dumb Cut for Smart Growth. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, May 16.
16. Edwards, M., and A. Haines. 2007. Evaluating Smart Growth - Implications for Small Communities. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27:49-64.
17. Egan-Robertson, D., D. Harrier, and B. Kale. 2004. Wisconsin Population 2030: A Report on Projected State, County, and Municipal Populations and Households for the Period 2000-2030. Report prepared for Demographic Service Center, Division of Intergovernmental Relations, Wisconsin Department of Administration. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Administration.
18. Frank, L., H. Frumkin, and R. Jackson. 2004. Urban Sprawl and Public Health - Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. Gould, W. 2002. Planner Pushing for Greener Subdivisions. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, October 23.
20. Gray, V., and D. Lowery. 2000. Where Do Policy Ideas Come From? A Study of the Minnesota Legislators and Staffers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:573-597.
21. Hamin, E. M. 2003. Legislating Growth Management: Power, Politics, and Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 69:368-380.
22. Harden, B., and J. Eilperin. 2006. Court Ruling Fuels Dispute in West over Eminent Domain: Initiative Challenges Land-Use Regulations. Washington Post, October 2.
23. Hicks, A. 2003. Smart Growth Irritates Many. Marshfield News (Marshfield, WI), May 2.
24. Hueckman, M. 2003. Price County Smart Growth Committee Votes to Dissolve. Bee, February 19. www.smartgrowth.org/news/article.asp?art=3232.
25. Innes, J., and D. E. Booher. 1999. Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65:412-423.
26. Ivey, M. 1995. Our Vanishing Farmland: Urban Pressures Eat Away at Wisconsin's Rural Edges. Capital Times, July 13.
27. Jacobs, H. M. 2003. The Politics of Property Rights at the National Level: Signals and Trends. Journal of the American Planning Association 69:181-189.
28. _. 2007. Social Conflict over Property Rights. Land Lines, April. www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/PubDetail.aspx?pubid=1222.
29. Leach, W. D., and P. A. Sabatier. 2005. To Trust an Adversary - Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking. American Political Science Review 99:491-503.
30. MacKinnon, L. 2006. Legislative Update. Landscapes, Spring. www.1kfriends.org/Publications/documents/Spring2006Newsletter.pdf (accessed December 17, 2007).
31. Meck, S. 2002. Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook. Chicago: American Planning Association.
32. _. 2005. Notes on Planning Statute Reform in the United States - Guideposts for the Road Ahead. In Planning Reform in a New Century, ed. Daniel R. Mandelker, 31-57. Chicago: American Planning Association.
33. Mell, D. 2005. Saving Smart Growth Was a Wise Decision. Leader Telegram, July 21.
34. Morris, M. 2007. Planning Active Communities. Chicago: American Planning Association.
35. Nolen, J. 1911. Madison: A Model City. digicoll.library.wisc.edu/ cgi-bin/History/History-idx?id=History.NolenMadsn (accessed December 14, 2007).
36. Nolon, J. R. 2005. Paradigms of Positive Change - Reordering the Nation's Land-Use System. In Planning Reform in a New Century, ed. Daniel R. Mandelker, 3-22. Chicago: American Planning Association.
37. Ohm, B. W. 2000. Reforming Land Planning Legislation at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century: The Emerging Influence of Smart Growth and Livable Communities. Urban Lawyer 32 (2): 181-210.
38. _. 2005. Universities as Participants in Planning Enabling Statute Reform. In Partnerships for Smart Growth: University-Community Collaboration for Better Public Places, ed. Wim Wiewel and Gerrit-Jan Knapp, 216-236. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
39. Ohm, B., and E. Schmidke. 1998. An Inventory of Land Use Plans in Wisconsin. Extension Report 98-3. Madison: University of Wisconsin Extension.
40. 1000 Friends of Wisconsin. 2002. Wisconsin's Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinances: Progress or Procrastination? October. www.1kfriends.org/new/tnd/index.html.
41. _. n.d. Smart Growth under Attack in Legislature. www.1kfriends.org/ Government_and_Policy/Govt_&_Policy.htm (accessed January 13, 2008).
42. Pendall, R. 2001. Municipal Plans, State Mandates, and Property Rights: Lessons from Maine. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:154-165.
43. Rauen, K. 2003. City's Growth Plan Stalled on Familiar Issues. Green Bay Press-Gazette, February 18.
44. Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.
45. Rodriguez, D. A., A. J. Khattak, and K. R. Evenson. 2006. Can New Urbanism Encourage Physical Activity? Comparing a New Urbanist Neighborhood with Conventional Suburbs. Journal of the American Planning Association 72:43-54.
46. Sabatier, P. A., and C. Weible. 2007. The Advocacy Coalition Framework - Innovations and Clarifications. In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed., ed. Paul Sabatier, 189-220. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47. Saelens, B. E., J. F. Sallis, J. B. Black, and D. Chen. 2003. Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation. American Journal of Public Health 93:1552-1558.
48. Sallis, J. F., L. Linton, and M. K. Kraft. 2005. The First Active Living Research Conference: Growth of a Transdisciplinary Field. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2, suppl. 2): 93-95.
49. Schilling, J., and L. S. Linton. 2005. The Public Health Roots of Zoning: In Search of Active Living's Legal Genealogy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2, suppl. 2): 96-104.
50. Sink, L. 2003 Repeal of Smart Growth Law Sought: Land Use Plans Cost Too Much, Opponents Say. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, July 28.
51. Sitkowski, R., and B. Ohm. 2002. Enabling the New Urbanism. Urban Lawyer 34 (4): 935-943.
52. Sloane, D. C. 2006. From Congestion to Sprawl - Planning and Health in Historical Context. Journal of the American Planning Association 72:10-18.
53. Sloth, P. 2005. Budget Committee Votes to Abolish Smart Growth Law. Onalaska Community Life, May 20. www.onalaskalife.com.
54. Smart Growth Network. 2004. Survey Would Assess Wisconsin's State-Mandated Smart Growth Law. August 2. www.smartgrowth.org/news/article.asp? art=4215.
55. Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
56. Susskind, L., S. McKearnan, and J. Thomas-Larmer. 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Sullivan, E. 2007. Recent Developments in Comprehensive Planning Law. Urban Lawyer 39 (3): 681-694.
58. University of Wisconsin Extension Local Government Center. 2000. Wisconsin's New Comprehensive Planning and Smart Growth Law (Summary). Fact Sheet 15. May. www.uwex.edu/lgc/program/pdf/fact15.pdf.
59. Walters, S. 2005. Budget Panel Votes to Kill Smart Growth: Legislators to Decide whether to Keep Mandate. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, May 12.
60. Weinstein, A. 2006. Kelo and Counting. Planning 72 (6): 24-29.
61. Wisconsin Democrats. 2005. Doyle Uses Line-Item Veto to Restore Wisconsin's Smart Growth Planning Program. July 18. www.smartgrowth.org/news/ article.asp?art=4875&state=50&res=1024.
62. Wisconsin Department of Administration. n.d. Tables of Grant Awards. www.doa.state.wi.us/category_print.asp?linkcatid=745&linkid=128&locid=9 (accessed January 24, 2008).
63. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 1995. Common Ground - Report of the DNR Land Use Task Force. Madison: Wisconsin DNR.
64. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. 1993. Statewide Land Use Task Force Final Report. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Transportation.
65. Wisconsin State Interagency Land Use Council. 1996. Planning Wisconsin - The Report of the State Interagency Land Use Council. Madison: Wisconsin State Interagency Land Use Council.
66. Zovanyi, G. 2007. The Role of Initial Statewide Smart-Growth Legislation in Advancing the Tenets of Smart Growth. Urban Lawyer 39 (2): 371-414.