Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm

Psychophysiology

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 588-601

  Travers, Stephanie ^b   West, Robert ^a,c  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LUTHER COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Event related potentials; Stroop task; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLOR; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 45149109696     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00658.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A. Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Umiltà, C. Moscovitch, M. (Eds.), Conscious and nonconscious information processing: Attention and performance XV (pp. 421 452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Huynh, H. Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69 82.
3. Jennings, J. R. (1987). Editorial policy on analyses of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology, 24, 474 475.
4. Kieffaber, P. D. Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology, 42, 56 71.
5. Kray, J., Eppinger, B. Mecklinger, A. (2005). Age differences in attentional control: An event-related potential approach. Psychophysiology, 42, 407 416.
6. Logan, G. D. Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cueing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575 599.
7. Logan, G. D. Bundesen, C. (2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cueing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832 840.
8. Logan, G. D. Schneider, D. W. (2006). Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 347 363.
9. MacDonald, A. W. III., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A. Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835 1838.
10. Mayr, U. Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362 372.
11. McCarthy, G. Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203 208.
12. Meyer, D. E. Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanism. Psychological Review, 104, 3 65.
13. Miller, E. K. Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167 202.
14. Monsell, S. Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cueing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493 516.
15. Nicholson, R., Karayanidis, F., Bumak, E., Poboka, D. Michie, P. T. (2006). ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues. Brain Research, 1095, 107 123.
16. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., et al 2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127 152.
17. Rogers, R. D. Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207 231.
18. Rugg, M. D. (2004). Retrieval processing in human memory: Electrophysiological and fMRI evidence. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III (pp. 727 737). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E. Nobre, A. C. (2002). Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1139 1150.
20. Rushworth, M. F., Passingham, R. E. Nobre, A. C. (2005). Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology, 52, 83 98.
21. Schneider, D. W. Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343 367.
22. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643 662.
23. West, R. (2004). The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 103 113.
24. West, R. Moore, K. (2005). Adjustments of cognitive control in younger and older adults. Cortex, 41, 570 581.
25. West, R. Travers, S. (2007). Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching. Manuscript submitted for publication.