Reducing the visual impact of 'greenhouse parks' in rural landscapes

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 76-83

  Rogge, Elke ^a   Nevens, Frank ^a   Gulinck, Hubert ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

GIS; Landscape integration; Public perception; Visibility analysis

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURE; COSTS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

LANDSCAPE DESIGN; LANDSCAPE INTEGRATION; LARGE-SCALE PROJECTS; NORTHERN REGIONS; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; RURAL LANDSCAPES; VISIBILITY ANALYSIS;

GREENHOUSES;

AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; ESTHETICS; GREENSPACE; HORTICULTURE; PERCEPTION; RURAL AREA; VISIBILITY;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; BENELUX; CANADA; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; NORTH AMERICA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 45049085580     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Al Kodmany K. Using visualisation techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation and evaluation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 45 (1999) 37-45
2. Anonymus, 2003. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Administratie Land- en Tuinbouw. Actieplan: Naar een duurzamere glastuinbouw in Vlaanderen.
3. Bacic I.L.Z., Rossiter D.G., and Bregt A.K. Using spatial information to improve collective understanding of shared environmental problems at watershed level. Landsc. Urban Plan. 77 (2006) 54-66
4. Badgery-Parker, J., 2001. Greenhouse horticulture-beyond Australia. Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia. Last accessed: December 20th 2007. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/greenhouse/start/beyond-australia.
5. Badgery-Parker, J., 2005. Guidelines for the development of controlled environment horticulture: striving for consistency, consensus and community. Planning greenhouse and hydroponic horticulture in NSW. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange NSW. Last accessed: December 20th 2007. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/greenhouse/start/guidelines
6. Bell S. Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landsc. Urban Plan. 54 (2001) 201-211
7. Bryan B.A. Physical environmental modelling, visualisation and query for supporting landscape planning decisions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 65 (2003) 237-259
8. Burrough P.A., and McDonnell R.A. Principles of Geographic Information Systems (1998), Oxford University Press, New York
9. Connoly J., and Lake M. Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
10. Fry G.L., and Sarlov Herlin I. Landscape design: how do we incorporate ecological cultural and aesthetic values in landscape assessment and design principles. In: Griffiths G.H. (Ed). Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. Proceedings IALE-UK Conference. Reading (1995) 51-60
11. Fry, G.L., Jerpasen, G., Skar, B., Stabbetorp, O., 2001. Combining landscape ecology with archaeology to manage cultural heritage interests in the changing countryside. In: Mander., U., Printsmann, A., Palang, H., 2000. Development of European Landscapes. Conference Proceedings IALE European Conference 2001, Publicationes Instituti Geographici Universitatis Tartuensis, Tartu, vol 2, pp. 198-202.
12. Garcia L., Hernandez J., and Ayuga F. Analysis of the materials and exterior texture of agro-industrial buildings: a photo-analytical approach to landscape integration. Landsc. Urban Plan. 74 (2006) 110-124
13. Georges, H., Van Lierde, D., Verspecht A., 2003. The Flemish greenhouse industry and its competitors. Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Social Sciences Unit. Publication 1.09, p. 87.
14. Hernandez J., Garcia L., and Ayuga F. Assessment of the visual impact on the landscape by new buildings: a methodology for site selection. Landsc. Urban Plan. 68 (2004) 15-28
15. Harrison A.R., Dunn R., Brown L., and Turton P.J. The use of Geographical Information Systems in the analysis of Countryside Data. Final Report to the Department of the Environment, PECD 7/7/77 (1991), HMSO, London
16. ISPAR - Istituto per lo studio del paesaggio e dell' architettura rurale, 2000. Manualetto di progettazione rispettosa del paesaggio. Ed. della Laguna, 79 p.
17. Lake M.W., Woodman P.E., and Mithen S.J. Tailoring GIS software for archaeological applications: an example concerning viewshed analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 25 (1998) 27-38
18. Lee J.T., Elton M.J., and Thompson S. The role of GIS in landscape assessment: using land-use-based criteria for an area of the Chiltern Hills Area of Outstanding natural Beauty. Land Use Policy 16 (1999) 23-32
19. Leterme, Y., 2007. Beleidsbrief 2007: Landbouw, Zeevisserij en Plattelandsbeleid. Last access: December 20th 2007. http://docs.vlaanderen.be/portaal/beleidsbrieven2006/leterme/beleidsbrief_landbouw.pdf.
20. Middleton W.E.K. Vision Trough the Atmosphere (1968), University of Toronto Press, Toronto
21. NIS, 2005. Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Brussel. Last accessed: December 20th 2007. http://www.statbel.fgov.be.
22. Oh K. Visual threshold carrying capacity (VTCC) in urban landscape management: a case of Seoul, Korea. Landsc. Urban Plan. 39 (1998) 283-294
23. Ogburn D. Assessing level of visibility of cultural objects in past landscapes. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33 (2006) 405-413
24. Palmer J.F., and Hoffman R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 54 (2001) 149-161
25. Peccol E., Bird A.C., and Brewer T.R. GIS as a tool for assessing the influence of countryside designations and planning policies on landscape change. J. Environ. Manage. 47 (1996) 355-367
26. Rogge E., Nevens F., and Gulinck H. Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: looking beyond aesthetics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 82 4 (2007) 159-174
27. Ruda G. Rural buildings and environment. Landsc. Urban Plan. 41 (1998) 93-97
28. Ryan R. Preserving rural character in New England: local residents' perception of alternative residential development. Landsc. Urban Plan. 61 (2002) 19-35
29. Sevenant M., and Antrop M. Settlements models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: two case studies in Greece. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80 4 (2006) 362-374
30. Swanwick C. Landscape character assessment, guidance for England and Scotland (2002), The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage p. 84
31. Tilley C. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Paths, Places and Monuments (1994), Berg, Oxford
32. Tilt J.H., Kearney A.R., and Bradley G. Understanding rural character: cognitive and visual perceptions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81 1-2 (2006) 14-26
33. Tress B., and Tress G. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landsc. Urban Plan. 64 (2003) 161-178
34. Van der Ham R., Schut G., and Iding J. Een voorstel voor een nieuwe landschapstypologie naar visuele kenmerken. Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting 51 (1970) 421-438
35. Wheatley D., and Gillings M. Vision, perception and GIS: developing enriched approaches to the study of archaeological visibility. In: Lock G. (Ed). Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, NATO Science Series A, Life Sciences vol. 321 (2000), IOS Press, Amsterdam 1-27
36. Wheatley D., and Gillings M. Spatial Technology and Archaeology: Archaeological Applications of GIS (2002), Taylor and Francis, London