Modelling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour

Transportation

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 467-484

  Nurul Habib, Khandker M ^a   Miller, Eric J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity generation; Activity utility; Day to day dynamics; Travel behaviour; Within day dynamics

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY UTILITY; DAY-TO-DAY DYNAMICS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; WITHIN-DAY DYNAMICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORTATION; TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

ECONOMETRICS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; MODELING; TIME ALLOCATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 44949174806     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-008-9166-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aptech Systems: GAUSS User's Manual. Maple Valley, CA (2006)
2. Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.J.P.: ALBATROSS Version 2.0 A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulated System, EIRASS (2005)
3. Arora, N., Allenby, G.M., Ginter, J.L.: A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Market Sci 17 (1), 29-44 (1998)
4. Bhat, C.R., Koppelman, F.S.: A conceptual framework of individual activity program generation. Transp Res A 27 (6), 433-446 (1993)
5. Bhat, C.R.: A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transp Res Record Part B 39, 679-707 (2005)
6. Bhat, C.R.: The multiple discrete-continuous extrRmem value model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations and model extension. Paper presented at the 11th IATBR Conference, Kyoto, Japan 2006
7. Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y., Srinivasan, S., Sivakumar, A.: A comprehensive econometric micro-simulator for daily activity travel patterns (CEMDAP). Paper presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC 2004
8. Doherty, S.T., Miller, E.J.: A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation 21 (1), 75-97 (2000)
9. Doherty, S.T.: Should we abandon activity type analysis? Redefining activities by their salient attributes. Transportation 36 (6), 517-536 (2006)
10. Doherty, S.T., Nemeth, E., Roorda, M.J., Miller, E.J.: Design and assessment of Toronto area computerized household activity scheduling survey. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1894, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, pp. 140-149 (2004)
11. Ettema, D.: LMtent activities: modelling the relationship between travel times and activity participations. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1926, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, pp. 171-181 (2005)
12. Gärling, T., Brännäs, K., Garvill, J., Golledge, R.G., Gopal, S., Holm, E., Lindberg, E.: Household activity scheduling. In: Transportation policy, management and technology towards 2001: Selected Proceedings of Fifth World Conference of Transportation Research vol. 4, pp. 235-248. Western Periodical, Ventura, CA (1989)
13. Gärling, T., Gillholm, R., Montgomery, W.: The role of anticipated time pressure in activity scheduling. Transportation 26, 173-191 (1999)
14. Gärling, T., Kwan, M-P., Golledge, R.G.: Computation-process modelling of household activity scheduling. Transp Res B 28 (5), 355-364 (1994)
15. Gärling T., Garvill J.: Psychological explanation of participation in everyday activities. In: Gärling, T., Golledge R.G. (ed.) Behaviour and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approach, Amsterdam, New York, Elsevier Science Publisher (1993)
16. Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: A conceptual model of activity-based travel demand model. In: Proceedings of PROCESSUS Second International Colloquium on the Behavioural Foundation of Land-Use Transportation Model: Frameworks, Models and Applications, Toronto, 12-15 June (2005)
17. Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.A.: Modelling activity generation: a utility based model for activity agenda formation. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on travel behaviour research, Kyoto (2006a)
18. Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: Modelling individuals' frequency and time allocation behaviour for shopping activities considering household level random effects. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1985, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, pp. 78-87 (2006b)
19. Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: Modelling skeleton components of workers' daily activity schedules. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1985, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, pp. 88-97 (2006c)
20. Hicks J.R.: Value and Capital. 2nd edn Oxford University Press, London (1946)
21. Kitamura, R., Yamamato, T., Susilo, Y.O., Axhausen, K.W.: On the day-to-day variability of prism vertex location. Paper presented at 82nd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC 2003
22. Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W.: Nonlinear programming. In: Neyman, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 481-492, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA (1951)
23. Litwin, M.: Dynamic Household Activity Scheduling Process. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto (2005)
24. Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J.: Prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling (TASHA). In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 114-121 (2003)
25. Miller, E.J.: Project-based activity scheduling for household and person agents. In: Mahmassani, H. (ed.) Flow, dynamics and human interactions-Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Elsevier, New York (2005)
26. Pendyala, R., Kitamura, R., Kikuchi, A., Yamamato, T., Fujii, S.: FAMOS: the Florida activity mobility simulator. Paper presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC 2004
27. Roorda, M.J., Miller,DE.J.: Toronto area panel survey: demonstrating the benefits of a multiple instrument panel survey. Preprint CD of Seventh International Conference on Travel Methods, Costa Rica, 1-2 August 2004
28. SAlvini, P., Miller, E.J.: ILUTE: an operational prototype of comprehensive microsimulation model of urban system. Network Spatial Econ 5, 217-234 (2005)
29. Schlich, R., AxhausenE K.W.: Habitual travel behaviour: evidence from a six-week travel diary. Transportation 30, 13-36 (2003)
30. von Haefen R.H., Phaneuf D.J.: Kuhn-Tucker demand system approach to non-market valuation. In: Scrapa, R., Alberini, A. (eds) Applications of Simulation Methods in Environment and Resource Economics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordetch/London (2004)
31. Winston, G.A.: Activity choice: a new approach to economic behaviour. J Econom Behav Organ 8, 567-588 (1987)