Should we abandon activity type analysis? Redefining activities by their salient attributes

Transportation

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 517-536

  Doherty, Sean T ^a  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activities; Activity type; Flexibility; Scheduling; Travel behaviour

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SCHEDULING;

ACTIVITY TYPE ANALYSIS; SALIENT ATTRIBUTES; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR;

MANAGEMENT;

MODELING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33750933857     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-006-0001-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arentze, T.A., Timmermans, H.J.P.: ALBATROSS: A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. The European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies. Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2000)
2. Bowman, J.L., Ben-Akiva, M.E.: Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Trans. Res. A 35(1), 1-28 (2001)
3. Brandth, B. and Kvande, E.: Flexible work and flexible fathers. Work Employ. Soc. 15(2), 251-267 (2001)
4. Breedveld, K.: The double mythTof flexibilization: trends in scattered work hours, and difference in time-sovereignty. Time Soc. 7(1), 129-143 (1998)
5. Cullen, I.Tand Godson, V.: Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns. Prog. Plann. 4(1), 1-96 (1975)
6. Doherty, S.T.: Rules for assessing activity scheduling survey respondents' data quality. J. Trans. Res. Board 1870, 109-115 (2004)
7. Doherty S.T.: How far in advance are activities planned? Measurement challenges and analysis. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1926, 41-49 (2005)
8. Doherty, S.T., Miller, E.J.: A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation 27(1), 75-97 (2000)
9. Doherty, S.T., Mohammadian, A.: Application of Artificial Neural Network Models to Activity Scheduling Time Horizon. J. Trans. Res. Board 1854, 43-49 (2003)
10. Doherty, S.T., Nemeth, E., Roorda, M., Miller, E.J.: Design and assessment of the toronto area computerized household activity scheduling survey. J. Trans. Res. Board 1894, 140-149 (2004)
11. Emmerink, R., van Beek, P.: Empirical analysis of work schedule flexibility: Implications for road pricing and driver information systems. Urban Stud. 34(2), 217-234 (1997)
12. Hägerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science?. Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc. 24(7), 7-21 (1970)
13. Joh C.H., Doherty S.T., Polak J.W.: Analysis of factors affecting frequency and type of activity schedule modification. J. Trans. Res. Board 1926, 19-25 (2005)
14. Kitamura, R., Chen, C., Pendyala, R.M., Narayanan, R.: Micro-simulation of daily activity-travel patterns for travel demand forecasting. Transportation 27(1), 25-51 (2000)
15. Limanond, T., Niemeier, D.A., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Specification of a tour-based neighborhood shopping model. Transportation 32, 105-134 (2005)
16. Miller, E.J.: Propositions for modelling household decision-making. In: Lee-Gosselin M., Doherty S.T. (eds) Integrated Land Use, Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations, pp. 21-60. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)
17. Miller, E.J. and Roorda, M.J.: A Prototype Model of Household Activity/ Travel Scheduling. Trans. Res. Rec.: J. Trans. Res. Board 1831: 114-121 (2003)
18. Mohammadian A., Doherty S.T.: A mixed logit model of activity scheduling time horizon incorporating spatial-temporal variables. J. Trans. Res. Board 1926, 33-40 (2005)
19. Roorda M., Miller E.J.: Strategies for resolving activity scheduling conflicts: An empirical analysis. In: Timmermans, H. (ed.) Progress in Activity-Based Analysis, pp. 203-222. Elsevier Science, Oxford (2003)
20. Schwanen, T., Dijst, M.: Time windows in workers' activity patterns: empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Transportation 30(3), 261-283 (2003)
21. Shiftan, Y.: Practical approach to model trip chaining. Trans. Res. Rec. 1645, 17-23 (1998)
22. Steward, BT: Changing times: the meaning, measurement and use of time in teleworking. Time Soc. 9(1), 57-74 (2000)