Healthcare workers' attitudes towards working during pandemic influenza: A multi method study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Draper, Heather ^a   Wilson, Sue ^a   Ives, Jonathan ^a   Gratus, Christine ^a   Greenfield, Sheila ^a   Parry, Jayne ^a   Petts, Judith ^a   Sorell, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFLUENZA; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PANDEMIC; QUESTIONNAIRE; EPIDEMIC; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SAMPLE SIZE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DISEASE OUTBREAKS; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH PLANNING; HUMANS; INFLUENZA, HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 44949110052     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-192     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response (EPR): Pandemic preparedness. World Health Organisation, 2008 http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/ pandemic/en/ Accessed 11th April 2008, 08:30 GMT
2. th April 2008, 08:35 GMT
3. th April 2008, 09:30 GMT
4. Duty to treat or right to refuse? N Daniels, Hastings centre report 1991 21 2 36 46 10.2307/3562338
5. Legal risks and responsibilities of physicians in the HIV epidemic. GJ Annas, Hastings Center Report 1988 18 2 S26 32 10.2307/3562423 11650068
6. Health professionals, codes and the right to refuse to treat HIV-infected patients. B Freedman, Hastings Center Report 1988 18 2 S20 25 10.2307/3562422 11650067
7. The fragile web of responsibility: AIDS and the duty to treat. JD Arras, Hastings Center Report 1988 18 2 S10 20 11650065
8. Physicians, AIDS, and occupational risk. Historic traditions and ethical obligations. A Zuger SH Miles, Journal of the American Medical Association 1987 258 14 1924 192 10.1001/jama.258.14.1924 3309386
9. On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares? C Ruderman C Shawn Tracy CM Bensimon M Bernstein L Hawryluck R Zlotnik Shaul REG Upshur, BMC Medical Ethics 2006 7 5 10.1186/1472-6939-7-5
10. Anaesthesia, ethics and severe acute respiratory syndrome. JC Bevan RE Upshur, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2003 50 977 979 14656773
11. Diminishing returns? Risk and the duty to care in the SARs epidemic. L Reid, Bioethics 2005 19 5 348 361 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00448.x 16222844
12. Nurses' fears and professional obligations concerning possible human-to-human avail flu. H-M Tzeng C-Y Yin, Nursing Ethics 2006 13 5 455 470 10.1191/0969733006nej893oa 16961111
13. Biological, chemical, and nuclear terrorism readiness: Major concerns and preparedness of future nurses. C Young D Persell, Disaster Management & Response 2005 2 4 109 114 10.1016/j.dmr.2004.08.010 15448625
14. th April 16608870
15. Influenza pandemic and professional duty: family or patient's first? A qualitative survey of hospital employees. BP Ehrenstein F Hanses B Salzberger, BMC Public Health 2006 6 311 17192198 10.1186/1471-2458-6-311
16. Healthcare workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. K Qureshi RRM Gershon MF Sherman T Straub E Gebbie M McCollum MJ Erwin SS Morse, Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2005 82 3 378 88 10.1093/jurban/jti086 16000654
17. Local public health workers' perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic. RD Balicer SB Omer DJ Barnett GS Everly Jr, BMC Public Health 2006 6 99 16620372 10.1186/1471-2458-6-99
18. The ethics of truth-telling and the problem of risk. PB Thompson, Science and Engineering Ethics 1999 5 4 489 510 10.1007/s11948-999-0050-5
19. Risk perception, social trust, and public participation into strategic decision-making - implications for emerging technologies. LJ Frewer, Ambio 1999 28 569 574
20. Emotional reactions to environmental risks: consequentialism versus ethical evaluation. G Bohm, Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003 32 2 199 212 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00114-7
21. Examining ethics in practice: health service professionals' evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminars. P Alderson C Williams B Farsides, Journal of Nursing Ethics 2002 9 518 531 12238747
22. Encounters with Experience: Empirical bioethics and the future. J Ives, Health Care Analysis 2008 16 1 6 10.1007/s10728-007-0077-1 18080836
23. Becoming a father/refusing fatherhood: An empirical bioethics approach to paternal responsibilities and rights. J Ives H Draper H Pattison C Williams, Clinical Ethics 2008 3 75 84 10.1258/ce.2008.008008
24. Office for National Statistics. 2008 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/ default.asp
25. Factors associated with the use of complementary medicine and non-pharmacological interventions in symptomatic menopausal women. A Daley C MacArthur R McManus H Stokes-Lampard S Wilson A Roalfe N Muthrie, Climacteric 2006 9 336 346 10.1080/13697130600864074 17000582
26. Vaginal Vault Smears - 'Know more - do less': a questionnaire survey of Primary healthcare practitioners. HJ Stokes-Lampard S Wilson T Allan C Waddell S Kehoe, Cytopathology 2005 16 244 251 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2005.00268.x 16181311
27. Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a community survey. S Wilson L Roberts A Roalfe P Bridge S Singh, British Journal of General Practice 2004 54 495 502 15239910
28. Prevalence of subclinical thyroid dysfunction in the elderly in England - the Birmingham Elderly Thyroid Study (BETS): a community based cross-sectional survey. S Wilson J Parle L Roberts A Roalfe R Hobbs P Clark M Sheppard M Gammage H Pattison J Franklyn, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 September 26, 2006 10.1210/jc.2006-1557
29. increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. P Edwards I Roberts M Clarke C DiGuiseppi S Pratap R Wentz I Kwan, BMJ 2002 324 1183 1185 12016181 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183