Examining ethics in practice: Health service professionals' evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminars

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 508-521

  Alderson, Priscilla ^a   Farsides, Bobbie ^a   Williams, Clare ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

genetics; haematology; neonatal; prenatal; screening; teaching ethics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; CONTINUING EDUCATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICIST; GENETICS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; TEACHING;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; ETHICISTS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; GENETICS; HUMANS; LEARNING; TEACHING;

EID: 0036729999     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733002ne541oa     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Nilstun T, Cuttini M, Saracci R. Teaching medical ethics to experienced staff. J Med Ethics 2001; 27: 409-412.
2. Perkins H, Geppert C, Hazuda H. Challenges in teaching ethics in medical schools. Am J Med Sci 2000; 319: 273-278.
3. Carson A. That’s another story: narrative methods and ethical practice. J Med Ethics 2001; 27: 198-202.
4. Nicholas B. Power and the teaching of medical ethics. J Med Ethics 1999; 25: 507-513.
5. Tysinger T, Klonis L, Sadler J, Wagner J. Teaching ethics using small-group, problem-based learning. J Med Ethics 1997; 23: 314-318.
6. Callahan D. The social sciences and the task of bioethics. Daedulus J Am Acad Arts Sci 1999; (Fall): 275-294.
7. Hope T. Empirical medical ethics. J Med Ethics 1999; 25: 219-220.
8. Tweeddale M. Teaching an old dog new tricks - a personal perspective on a decade of efforts by a clinical ethics committee to promote awareness of medical ethics. J Med Ethics 2001; 27: 411-431.
9. Larcher V, Lask B, McCarthy J. Paediatrics at the cutting edge: do we need a clinical ethics committee? J Med Ethics 1997; 23: 245-249.
10. Williams C, Farsides B, Alderson P. Dilemmas encountered by health practitioners offering nuchal translucency screening: a qualitative case study. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 216-220.
11. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. ‘Drawing the line’ in prenatal screening and testing: health practitioners’ discussions. Health Risk Soc 2002; 4(1): 61-75.
12. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. Conflicting perceptions of the fetus. New Genet Soc 2001; 20: 225-238.
13. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. Is non-directiveness possible within the context of ante-natal screening and testing? Soc Sci Med 2001; 54: 339-347.
14. Fox R. Medical uncertainty revisited. In: Bendelow G, Carpenter M, Vautier C, Williams S eds. Gender, health and healing. London: Routledge/Falmer, 2002: 249-249.
15. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. London: SAGE, 1990.
16. Weber R. Basic content analysis. London: SAGE, 1990.
17. Kerr A, Cunningham-Burley S, Amos A. The new genetics: professionals’ discursive boundaries. Sociol Rev 1997; 45: 279-303.
18. Werzt D, Gregg R. Genetics services in a social, ethical and policy context. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 272-276.
19. Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Down’s syndrome. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2(1).