The role of solvent fluctuations in hydrophobic assembly

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 112, Issue 19, 2008, Pages 6187-6192

  Willard, Adam P ^a   Chandler, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROPHOBICITY; PHASE INTERFACES; SOLVENTS; TUNNELS; VAPORS;

COARSE-GRAINED; DEGREES OF FREEDOM; HYDROPHOBIC PARTICLES; LIQUID VAPORS; MODEL SYSTEMS; NANO SCALING; REACTION COORDINATES; SOLVENT FLUCTUATIONS; SOLVENT MODELS; TRANSITION PATH SAMPLING;

SELF ASSEMBLY;

SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; HYDROPHOBICITY;

DIMERIZATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; SOLVENTS;

EID: 44949104127     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp077186+     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ten Wolde, P. R.; Chandler, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 6539.
2. Chandler, D. Nature 2005, 437, 640.
3. Miller, T. F.; Vanden-Eijnden, E.; Chandler, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1001, 104, 14559.
4. Stillinger, F. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 1087.
5. Lum, K.; Chandler, D.; Weeks, J. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4570.
6. Poynor, A.; Hong, L.; Robinson, I. K.; Granick, S.; Zhang, Z.; Fenter, P. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 79, 266101.
7. Mezger, M.; Reichert, H.; Schöder, S.; Okasinski, J.; Schröder, H.; Dosch, H.; Palms, D.; Ralston, J.; Honkimäki, V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 18401.
8. Chandler, D. Nature 2007, 445, 831.
9. Wallqvist, A.; Berne, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 2893.
10. Lum, K.; Chandler, D. Int. J. Thermophys. 1998, 19, 845.
11. Bolhuis, P. G.; Chandler, D. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 8154.
12. Huang, D. M.; Geissler, P. L.; Chandler, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6704.
13. Maibaum, L.; Chandler, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 9025.
14. ten Wolde, P. R.; Sun, S. X.; Chandler, D. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 65, 011201.1.
15. Weeks, J. D.; Chandler, D.; Andersen, H. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 5237.
16. Frenkel, D.; Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulation, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, 2002.
17. Hummer, G.; Garde, S.; Poborille, A.; Pratt, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 8951.
18. Bolhuis, P. G.; Chandler, D.; Dellago, C.; Geissler, P. L. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2002, 53, 291.
19. In this study, p̄(q,τ) for the one-dimensional coordinate was computed by taking N to be the product of 50 individual trajectories for each of 1000 unique configurations. For the two-dimensional coordinates N was the product of 100 individual trajectories for each of 50 unique initial configurations.
20. cyl) were computed by taking N = 500 initial configurations each averaged over 100 individual trajectories.
21. Luzar, A.; Leung, K. J. Chem Phys. 2000, 113, 5836.
22. Huang, X.; Zhou, R.; Berne, B. J. J. Phys. Chem B 2005, 109, 3546.
23. Kawasaki, K. Phys. Rev. 1966, 145, 375.