A context-based integrative framework for e-government initiatives

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 448-461

  Nour, Mohamed A ^a   AbdelRahman, AbdelRahman A ^a   Fadlalla, Adam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHARJAH   (United Arab Emirates)

^b Cleveland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Democratization index; E government; E government values; Framework; Goals; Readiness index

Indexed keywords

EID: 44849126110     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bakry S.H. Development of e-government-A STOPE view. International Journal of Network Management 14 (2004) 339-350
2. Bozeman B. All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories (1987), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
3. Case Studies on Indian (and other) e-government initiatives. Retrieved September 11, 2005, from http://www.egov4dev.org/topic1cases2.htm
4. Chadwick A., and May C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "E-government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 16 2 (2003) 271-300
5. Clark E. Managing the transformation to e-government: An Australian perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review 45 4 (2003) 377-397
6. Deakins E., and Dillon S.M. E-government in New Zealand: The local authority perspective. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 15 5 (2002) 375-398
7. Doty P., and Erdelez S. Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for e-government. Government Information Quarterly 19 2 (2002) 369-387
8. Edmiston K.D. State and local e-government: Prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration 33 1 (2003) 20-45
9. Gilbert D., and Balestrini P. Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 4 (2004) 286-301
10. Hazlett S.A., and Hill F.M. E-government: The realities of using IT to transform the public sector. Managing Service Quality 13 6 (2003) 445-452
11. Ho A.T.-K. Reinventing local governments and the E-government initiative. Public Administration Review 62 4 (2002) 434-444
12. Ho A.T., and Ni A.Y. Explaining the adoption of e-government features: A case study of Iowa county treasurers' offices. American Review of Public Administration 34 2 (2004) 164-180
13. Holliday I., and Kwok R.C.W. Governance in the information age: Building e-government in Hong Kong. New Media Society 6 (2004) 549-570
14. Retrieved April 8, 2005, from http://humandevelopment.bu.edu/dev_indicators/start.cfm?header_id=13
15. Jaeger P. The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly 20 (2003) 323-331
16. Jaeger P.T., and Thompson K.M. E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly 20 (2003) 389-394
17. Kaplan R. Freedom review (1994), Freedom House, New York
18. Kaylor C., Deshazo R., and Van Eck D. Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly 18 2 (2001) 293-307
19. Ke W., and Wei K.W. Successful e-government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM 47 6 (2004) 95-99
20. Kossick R.M. Mexico's emerging E-government program: The role of the Internet in promoting economic development, democratic governance, and the Rule of the Law. Law and Business Review of the Americas (2002) 141-187
21. Lambrinoudakis C., Gritzalis S., Dridi F., and Pernul G. Security requirements for e-government services: A methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer Communications 26 (2003) 1873-1883
22. McDonagh H. E-government in Australia: The challenge to privacy of personal information. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 10 3 (2002) 327-343
23. McGregor M.A., and Holman J. Communication technology at the Federal Communications Commission: E-government in the public interest?. Government Information Quarterly 21 (2004) 268-283
24. Moon M.J. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review 62 4 (2002) 424-433
25. Netchaeva I. E-government and e-democracy: A comparison of opportunities in the North and South. Gazette 64 5 (2002) 467-477
26. Scherlis W.L., and Eisenberg J. It research, innovation, and e-government. Communications of the ACM 46 1 (2003) 67-68
27. Sepic R., and Kase K. The National Biological Information Infrastructure as an E-Government tool. Government Information Quarterly 19 (2002) 407-424
28. Strejcek G., and Theil M. Technology push, legislation pull? E-government in the European Union. Decision Support Systems 34 (2002) 305-313
29. Transparency International's 2004 Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved September 11, 2005, from http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2004/cpi2004.en.html#cpi2004
30. UN Global E-Government Readiness Report. (2004). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved March 27, 2005, from http://www.unpan.org/egovernment3.asp
31. West D. E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 64 1 (2004) 15-27
32. Wong W., and Welch E. Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of Website openness and government accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 17 2 (2004) 275-297