A graph-based framework for early assessment of functional failures in complex systems

2007 Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2007

Volumn 3 PART A, Issue , 2008, Pages 395-400

  Kurtoglu, Tolga ^a   Tumer, Irem Y ^b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex system design; Configuration flow graphs; Failure prevention and analysis; Functional modeling; Risk based design

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT SYSTEMS; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; COST DESIGN; DESIGN PROCESSES; DESIGN THEORY AND METHODOLOGY; FAULT-PROPAGATION; FLUIDIC SYSTEMS; FUNCTIONAL FAILURES; GRAPH-BASED; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS; MICRO AND NANO SYSTEMS; NOVE L APPROACH; PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; POTENTIAL FAULTS; PROPAGATION PATHS; QUALITATIVE REASONING (QR); SYSTEM ENGINEERS; SYSTEM MODELLING; TECHNICAL CONFERENCES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; CRACK PROPAGATION; DESIGN; ENGINEERING; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROSENSORS; MODEL STRUCTURES; NANOSYSTEMS; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SAFETY ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 44849125989     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2007-35421     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. st Integrated Systems Health Engineering and Management Forum. Napa, CA. November 2005.
2. Department of Defense, "Procedures for performing failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis." MIL-STD-1629A.
3. Vesely, W. E., Goldberg, F. F., Roberts, N. H. and Haasi, D. F., The Fault Tree Handbook, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG 0492, 1981.
4. Greenfield, M.A. "NASA's Use of Quantitative Risk Assessment for Safety Upgrades". In IAAA Symposium. 2000. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
5. Stamatelatos, M. and Apostolakis, G. "Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners v1.1". 2002, NASA, Safety and Mission Assurance.
6. Giarratano, Joseph C. and Riley, Gary D., Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition, PWS Publishing Company, Boston MA, 2004.
7. Shortliffe, E. "MYCIN: Computer-Based Medical Consultations", Elsevier, New York, 1976.
8. Touchton, R.A. "Emergency Classification: A Real Time Expert System Application", Proc. of SouthCon, 1986.
9. deKleer, J. and B.C. Williams, "Diagnosing multiple faults," AI, vol. 32, pp. 97-130, 1987.
10. Chen, J. and Patton, R.J. "Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems", Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998
11. Dvorak D., B.J. Kuipers, "Model Based Monitoring of Dynamic Systems", IJCAI, 1989.
12. Patton, R., P. Frank, and R. Clark, Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall, Inc., Hertfordshire, UK, 1989.
13. Williams, B. C., Nayak, P. P. "A Model-based Approach to Reactive Self-Configuring Systems", AAAI 1996, pp 971-978.
14. Kurien, J., Nayak, P. "Back to the Future with Consistency-based Trajectory Tracking," AAAI'00, pp370-377.
15. Kramer, M.A. and B. L. Palowitch Jr, "A rule-based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph," AIChE Journal, vol. 33, no. 7, pp.1067 - 1078.
16. N.S.V. Rao. "On Parallel Algorithms for Single-Fault Diagnosis in Fault Propagation Graph Systems", IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 7, Issue 12, (December 1996), 1217-1223.
17. Chessa, S. and Santi, P. "Operative Diagnosis of Graph-Based Systems with Multiple Faults", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 31, No. 2, (March 2001).
18. Fang Tu; Pattipati, K.R.; Deb, S.; Malepati, V.N., "Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Multiple Fault Diagnosis in Large Graph-based Systems", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, Vol.33, (2003).
19. Stevenson, Robert W., Miller, James G., Austin, Michael E., "Failure Environment Analysis Tool (FEAT) Development Status," AIAA Computing in Aerospace VIII Conference, AIAA 91-3803, Baltimore, MD, 1991.
20. Abdelwahed S., Karsai G., Biswas G., "System Diagnosis using Hybrid Failure Propagation Graphs", Technical Report, Vanderbilt University, ISIS-02-302, 2003.
21. Sacks, Ivan J., "Digraph Matrix Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. R-34, no. 5, pp 437-446, December, 1985.
22. Deb, S., Pattipati, K.R., Raghavan, V., Shakeri, M., Shrestha, R. "Multisignal flow graphs: a novel approach for system testability analysis and fault diagnosis", IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Systems Magazine, Vol.10, No. 5, pp. 14-25, 1995.
23. QSI, Q.S.I., Testability Engineering and Maintenance System (TEAMS) Tool.
24. Yairi, T., Kato, Y. and Hori, K., 2001, "Fault Detection by Mining Association Rules from House-keeping Data", Proc. of SAIRAS 2001.
25. Berenji, H., Ametha, J., and Vengerov, D. (2003) "Inductive Learning For Fault Diagnosis", In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 726-731.
26. Mehr, A.F. and I. Y. Tumer, "Risk based decision making for managing resources during the design of complex aerospace systems." ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 1014-1022. July 2006.
27. Hoyle, C., Mehr, A. F., Tumer, I. Y., Chen, W. "On quantifying cost-benefit of ISHM in Aerospace systems." 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
28. Tumer, I. Y., "Towards ISHM Co-Design: Methods and practices for fault avoidance and management during early phase design". 1st Integrated Systems Health Engineering and Management Forum (to be published as a book chapter). Napa, CA. November 2005.
29. th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Stanford, CA. September 2005.
30. Tumer, I.Y. and R.B. Stone, "Mapping Function to Failure During High-Risk Component Development". Research in Engineering Design, 2003. 14: p. 25-33.
31. Stone, R.B., Tumer, I.Y. and VanWie, M. "The function-failure design method." Journal of Mechanical Design, 2005. 127(3): p. 397-407.
32. Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., and Wood, K., "A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts," Research in Engineering Design 13(2): 65-82, 2002.
33. Tumer, I.Y., Stone, R., and Bell, D., "Requirements for a Failure Mode Taxonomy for use in Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Stockholm, 2003, paper 1612.
34. Roberts, R., Stone, R., and Tumer, I.Y., "Deriving Function-Failure Information for Failure-Free Rotorcraft Component Design," Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DETC2002/DFM-34166, Montreal, Canada, 2002.
35. R. Hutcheson and I. Y. Tumer, "Function-based design of a spacecraft power subsystem diagnostics testbed". ASME IMECE2005-81120. Orlando, FL. 2005.
36. Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., and Tumer, I., "Prescribing and Implementing the Risk in Early Design (RED) Method", Proceedings of the ASME DETC, Philadelphia, PA, 2006.
37. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Design Council, London, 1984.
38. Kurtoglu, T., Campbell, M., "Automated Synthesis of Electromechanical Configurations from Empirical Analysis of Function to Form Mapping". Research in Engineering Design, In Review.
39. Kurtoglu, T., Campbell, M., Bryant, C., Stone, R., "A Component Taxonomy as a Framework for Computational Functional Synthesis", Journal of Computing and Information Sciences in Engineering, In Review.