Mapping function to failure mode during component development

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 25-33

  Tumer, Irem Y ^a   Stone, Robert B ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Missouri University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Design for failure; Design for reliability; Failure prevention in design; Function failure similarity; Risk based design

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RELIABILITY; RISKS;

AEROSPACE SYSTEM DESIGN; DESIGN FOR FAILURE; DESIGN FOR RELIABILITY; ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE; FAILURE PREVENTION;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 0037302341     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-002-0024-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Tumer IY, Stone RB (2001) Analytical method for mapping function to failure during high-risk component development. In: ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, September vol DETC2001/DFM-21173. ASME, New York
2. Collins JA, Hagan BT (1976) The failure-experience matrix: a useful design tool. J Eng Ind 98:1074-1079
3. Carter ADS (1997) Mechanical reliability and design. Wiley, New York
4. Collins JA (1993) Failure of materials in mechanical design: analysis, prediction, prevention. Wiley Interscience, New York
5. Henley EJ, Kumamoto H (1992) Probabilistic risk assessment: reliability engineering, design, and analysis. IEEE, New York
6. Phadke MS (1989) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7. Bowles JB (1998) The new SAE FMECA standard In: Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. IEEE, Piscataway, N.J.
8. Eubanks CF, Kmenta S, Ishii K (1997) Advanced failure modes and effects analysis using behavior modeling. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, Calif., September. ASME, New York
9. Henning S, Paasch R (2000) Diagnostic analysis for mechanical systems. In: ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Baltimore, Md., September vol DETC2000/DTM-14580. ASME, New York
10. Stone RB, Wood KL (2000) Development of a functional basis for design. J Mech Des 122:359-370
11. Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000) Using quantitative functional models to develop product architectures. Des Studies 21:239-260
12. Pahl G, Beitz W (1988) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
13. Ullman D (1997) The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New York
14. Ulrich K, Eppinger S (1995) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York
15. Akiyama K (1991) Function analysis: systematic improvement of quality performance. Productivity Press, Portland, Ore.
16. Miles L (1972) Techniques of value analysis engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York
17. Hundal M (1990) A systematic method for developing function structures, solutions and concept variants. Mech Mach Theory 25:243-256
18. Koch P, Peplinski J, Ilen J, Mistree F (1994) A method for design using available assets: identifying a feasible system configuration. Behav Sci 30:229-250
19. Malmqvist J, Axelsson R, Johansson M (1996) A comparative analysis of the theory of inventive problem solving and the systematic approach of Pahl and Beitz. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Irvine, Calif., September vol DETC96/DTM-1529. ASME, New York
20. Altshhuller G (1984) Creativity as an exact science. Gordon & Breach, New York
21. Kirschman C, Fadel G (1998) Classifying functions for mechanical design. J Mech Des 120:475-482
22. Little A, Wood K, McAdams D (1997) Functional analysis: a fundamental empirical study for reverse engineering, benchmarking and redesign. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, Calif., September, vol. DETC97/DTM-3879. ASME, New York
23. Otto K, Wood K (1997) Conceptual and configuration design of products and assemblies. ASM handbook, materials selection and design. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, p. 20
24. Hirtz J, Stone R, McAdams D, Szykman M, Wood K (2002) A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res Eng Des 13:65-82
25. Huff EM, Tumer IY, Barszcz E, Dzwonczyk M, McNames J (2002) Analysis of maneuvering effects on transmission vibrations in an AH-1 Cobra helicopter. J Am Helicopter Soc 47:42-49
26. Roberts RA, Stone RB, Tumer IY (2002) Deriving function-failure similarity information for failure-free rotorcraft component design. In: ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Montreal, Canada, September, vol DETC2002/DFM-34166. ASME, New York
27. Tumer I Y, Stone RB, Roberts RA (2002) Towards failure-free design: reducing dimensionality in function-failure similarity analysis for large databases In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition vol IMECE2002-33473, New Orleans, November, ASME, New York
28. Harris FD, Kasper EF, Iseler LE (2000) US civil rotorcraft accidents: 1963 through 1997. NASA/TM-2000-209597, December