Analysis of team interaction and team creativity of student design teams based on personal creativity modes

2007 Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2007

Volumn 3 PART A, Issue , 2008, Pages 55-67

  Kim, Myung Sook ^a   Kim, Yong S E ^a   Kim, Tae Hoon ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Design team composition; Personal creativity mode; Team creativity; Team interaction

Indexed keywords

CREATIVE (CO); DESIGN ACTIVITIES; DESIGN TASKS; DESIGN TEAMS; DESIGN THEORY AND METHODOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL GROUP (EXPG); IN CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL (PSS 544-7); INTERACTION PATTERNS; INTERACTION PROCESSES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS; MICRO AND NANO SYSTEMS; PROTOCOL DATA; STUDENT DESIGN TEAMS; TEAM CREATIVITY; TEAM INTERACTION; TEAM MEMBERS; TECHNICAL CONFERENCES;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; ENGINEERING; FLOW INTERACTIONS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION THEORY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROSENSORS; NANOSYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PRODUCT DESIGN; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN;

EID: 44849125353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2007-35378     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Amabile, T. M., The social psychology of creativity. New York; Springer-Verlag. 1983.
2. Amabile, T. M., A model of creativity and innovation. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 10, 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI. 1988.
3. Bales, R. F., Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press. 1950.
4. Barron, F., Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1969..
5. Barron, F., and Harrington, D. M., Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476, 1981
6. Bennis, W, and Biederman, P. W., Organizing genius: The secrets of creative collaboration, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1997.
7. Berry, B., and Stewart, G., Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied psychology, 82, 62-78, 1997.
8. Besemer, S. P., Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model structure and a comparison among products-Three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 333-346. 1998.
9. Besemer, S. P., and O'Quin, K., Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample, Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287-296. 1999.
10. Christiaans, H., Creativity as a design criterion, Creativity Research Journal. Vol. 14 (1), 41-54, 2002.
11. Davis, G. A., Creativity is forever (4th Ed.), Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing. 1999.
12. th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 1998.
13. Gardner, H., Creating mind: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Eliot, Graham and Gandhi. New York: Harper Collins. 1993.
14. Guilford, J. P., Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. 1950.
15. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., and Chen, M-J., The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firm's competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684, 1996.
16. Hekkert, P., and Wieringen, P. C. W. Van., Beauty in the eye of expert and non expert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of psychology, 109, 389-407, 1996.
17. Houtz, J. C., Selby, E., Esquvel, G. B., Okoye, R, and Peters, K. M., Creativity styles and personal type. Creative Research Journal, 15, 321-330, 2003.
18. InterACT manual. Mangold international GmbH. 2006.
19. Isacksen, S. G.,(1987). Introduction : An orientation to the frontiers of creativity research, In S. G. Isaksen(Ed.). Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 1-26), New York: Bearly.
20. Isaksen, S.G., Dorval, K.B., and Treffinger, D.J., Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt. 2000
21. Kim, M. S., Kim, Y. S., and Lee, H. S., Personal creativity mode and perceived creativity, Proc. of Int'l. Design Research Symposium, Korea, 2006.
22. Kim, Y. S., Kim, M. H., and Jin, S, T., Cognitive characteristics and design creativity: an experimental study. Proc. ASME Int'l. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Long Beach. 2005.
23. Kim, Y. S., Jin, S. T., and Lee S. W., Design Activity and Personal Creativity Characteristics: A Case Study of Dual Protocol Analysis Using Design Information and Process, Proc. ASME Int'l. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology. Philadelphia. 2006.
24. Kirton, M., Adaptors and innovators: A desription and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629. 1976.
25. Kirton, M., Adaptors and innovators: Cognitive style and personality. In S. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basic (pp. 282-304). Buffalo, NY: Bearly limited. 1987.
26. Kurtzberg, T. R., and Amabile, T. M., From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285-294, 2001.
27. Kurtzberg, T. R., Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 51-6. 2005.
28. Levesque, L. C., Breakthrough creativity: Achieving top performance using the eight creative talents, Palo Alto, Davies-Black. 2001
29. MacKinnon, D. W., Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281, 1965.
30. MacKinnon, D. W., The study of creative persons: A method and some results. In J. Kagan (ED.), Creativity and learning (pp. 20-35). Boston: Beacon. 1967
31. Mayer, R. E., Fifty years of creativity research, In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.449-460). New York: Cambridge University Press. 1999.
32. Milliken, F. J., and Martins, L., Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational group. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433, 1996.
33. Nemeth C. J., and Nemeth-Brown, B., Better than individual? the potential benefits of dissent and diversity. In P. B, Paulus, and B. A. Nijstad, (Ed.), Group creativity. (pp.63-84). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
34. O'Quin, K., and Besemer, S. P., Using the Creative Product Semantic Scale as a Metric for Results - Oriented Biusiness. Creativity and Onnovation Management, Vol.16 (1). 2006.
35. Paulus, P. B, and Nijstad, B. A., Group creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
36. Rhodes, M., An analysis oof creativity. Phi Delta Kappen, 42,305-310. 1961.
37. Runco, M. A., Interrater agreement on a socially valid measure of students' creativity. Psychological Reports, 61, 1009-1010. 1987.
38. Runco, M. A., McCarth, K. A., and Svenson, E., Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artist. Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31. 1993.
39. Rust J., and Golombok, S., Modern Psychometrics, London:Routledge. 1999.
40. Sternberg, R. J., and Lubart, T. I., Investing in creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 229-232. 1993.
41. Wilde, D. J., 1999, Design Team Role, Proc. ASME Int'l. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Las Vegas.
42. Wilde, D. J, and Fukuda, S., A New Phase in Team Construction and Guidance, unpublished manuscript. 2001.
43. Wilde, D. J, and Labno, D. B., Personality and the Creative Impulse, unpublished manuscript. 2001