Effect of membrane charge on flow and protein transport during ultrafiltration

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 484-492

  Mehta, Amit ^a   Zydney, Andrew L ^a  

^a The Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; CELLULOSE; ELECTRIC CHARGE; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROOSMOSIS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY DATA; PROTEIN TRANSMISSION; QUATERNARY AMINE FUNCTIONALITY; STREAMING POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS; SURFACE CHARGE DENSITY;

PROTEINS;

CYTOCHROME C;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OSMOLARITY; OSMOSIS; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; TIME; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CYTOCHROMES C; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; OSMOSIS; SOLUTIONS; TIME FACTORS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 33646029095     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bp050324x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Pujar, N. S.; Zydney, A. L. Electrostatic and Electrokinetic Interactions during Protein Transport through Narrow Pore Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2473-2482.
2. Burns, D. B.; Zydney, A. L. Effect of Solution pH on Protein Transport through Semipermeable Ultrafiltration Membranes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 64, 27-37.
3. Nakao, S.; Osada, H.; Kurata, H.; Tsuru, T.; Kimura, S. Separation of Proteins by Charged Ultrafiltration Membranes. Desalination 1988, 70, 191-205.
4. Miyama, H.; Tanaka, K.; Nosaka, Y.; Fujii, N.; Tanzawa, H.; Nagaoka, S. Charged Ultrafiltration Membrane for Permeation of Proteins. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1988, 36, 925-933.
5. Nyström, M.; Aimar, P.; Luque, S.; Kulovaara, M.; Metsämuuronen, S. Fractionation of Model Proteins using their Physiochemical Properties. Colloids Surf., A 1998, 138, 185-205.
6. Burns, D. B.; Zydney, A. L. Contributions to Electrostatic Interactions on Protein Transport in Membrane Systems. AIChE J. 2001, 47, 1101-1114.
7. Hunter R. J. Zeta Potential in Colloid Science; Academic Press: London, 1981; pp 188-190.
8. Huisman, I. H.; Trägårdh, G.; Pihlajamäki, A. Determining the Zeta-Potential of Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes using the Electroviscous Effect. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 147, 187-194.
9. Ehsani, N.; Parkkinen, S.; Nyström, M. Fractionation of Natural and Model Egg-white Protein Solutions with Modified and Unmodified Polysulfone UF Membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 1997, 123, 105-119.
10. Su, Y.; Jian, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, G. Preparation and Characterization of Quatemized Poly(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) NF Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 241, 225-233.
11. Nyström, M.; Lindström, M.; Matthiasson, E. Streaming Potential as a Tool in the Characterization of Ultrafiltration Membranes. Colloids Surf. 1989, 36, 297-312.
12. Kim, K. J.; Fane, A. G.; Nystrom, M.; Pihlajamaki, A.; Bowen, W. R.; Mukhtar, H. Evaluation of Electroosmosis and Streaming Potential for Measurement of Electric Charges of Polymeric Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 116, 149-159.
13. Burns, D. B.; Zydney, A. L. Buffer Effects on the Zeta Potential of Ultrafiltration Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172, 39-48.
14. Smoluchowski, M. Zur Theorie der Electrischen Kataphorese und der Oberfl Chenleitung. Phys. Z. 1905, 6, 529-536
15. Granath, K. A.; Kvist, B. E. Molecular Weight Distribution Analysis by Gel Chromatography on Sephadex. J. Chromatogr. 1967, 28, 69.
16. Newman, J. S. Electrokinetic Phenomena In Electrochemical Systems; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1973; pp 189-190.
17. Smith, F. G.; Deen, W. M. Electrostatic Double-Layer Interactions for Spherical Colloids in Cylindrical Pores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 78, 444.
18. Wilkins, D. K.; Grimshaw, S. B.; Receveur, V.; Dobson, C. M.; Jones, J. A.; Smith, L. J. Hydrodynamic Radii of Native and Denatured Proteins Measured by Pulse Field Gradient NMR Techniques. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 16424-16431.
19. Smith K. A.; Colton C. K.; Merrill E. W.; Evans L. B. Convective Transport in a Batch Dialyzer: Determination of the True Membrane Permeability from a Single Measurement. AIChE Symp. Ser. 1968, 64, 45.
20. Lewus, R. K.; Carta, G. Protein Diffusion in Charged Polyacrylamide Gels: Visualization and Analysis. J. Chromatogr., A 1999, 865, 155-168.
21. Kofinas, P.; Athanassiou, V.; Merill, E. W. Hydrogels Prepared by Electron Irradiation of Poly(ethylene oxide) in Water Solution: Unexpected Dependence of Cross-link Density and Protein Diffusion Coefficients on Initial PEO Molecular Weight. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 1547-1550.
22. Lewus, R. K.; Carta, G. Protein Transport in Constrained Anionic Hydrogels: Diffusion and Boundry-Layer Mass Transfer. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1548-1558.
23. Pujar, N. S.; Zydney, A. L. Charge Regulation and Electrostatic Interactions for a Spherical Particle in a Cylindrical Pore. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 192, 338-349.
24. Mehta, A.; Zydney, A. L. Permeability and Selectivity Analysis for Ultrafiltration Membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 249, 245-249.
25. Zydney, A. L.; Aimar, P.; Meireles, M.; Pimbley, J. M.; Belfort, G. Use of the Log-Normal Probability Density Function to Analyze Membrane Pore Size Distributions: Functional Forms and Discrepancies. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 91, 293-298.
26. Bungay P. M.; Brenner, H. The Motion of a Closely Fitting Sphere in a Fluid Filled Tube. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 1973, 1, 25.
27. Saksena, S.; Zydney, A. L. Pore Size Distribution Effects on Electrokinetic Phenomena in Semipermeable Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 105, 203-216.
28. Horn, D.; Heuck, C. Charge Determination of Proteins with Polyelectrolyte Titration. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 1665-1670.