A comment on employee surveys: Negativity bias in open-ended responses

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 614-630

  Poncheri, Reanna M ^a   Lindberg, Jennifer T ^a   Thompson, Lori Foster ^a   Surface, Eric A ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Surface Ward and Associates

Author keywords

Comments; Negativity bias; Online personnel surveys; Open ended survey responses; Organizational surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649195003     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428106295504     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bobko, P. (1995). Correlation and regression: Principles and applications for industrial/organizational psychology and management. New York: McGraw Hill.
2. Borg, I. (2005, April). Who writes what kinds of comments? Some new findings. In A. I. Kraut (Chair). Grappling with write-in comments in a web-enabled survey world. Symposium conducted at the 20th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
3. Converse, J.M. (1987). Survey research in the United States: Roots and emergence 1890-1960. Los Angeles: University California Press.
4. Dasborough, M.T. (2006). Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 163-178.
5. Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2 nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
6. Fenlason, K.J. (2005, April). Comments: Where have we been? Where are we going? Symposium conducted at the 20th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
7. Gardham, K., & Brown, R. (2001). Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: Explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 23-34.
8. Geer, J.G. (1991). Do open-ended questions measure "salient" issues ? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 360-370.
9. Gregory, R.J. (2000). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (3 rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Jackson, K.M., & Trochim, W.M.K. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 307-336.
11. Kraut, A.I. (2005, April). Grappling with write-in comments in a web-enabled survey world. Symposium conducted at the 20th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
12. Kraut, A.I. (2006). Moving the needle: Getting action after a survey. In A. I. Kraut (Ed.), Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies, and applications (pp. 1-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Krosnick, J.A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537-567.
14. Kulesa, P., & Bishop, R.J. (2006). What did they really mean? New and emerging methods for analyzing themes in open-ended comments. In A. I. Kraut (Ed.), Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies, and applications (pp. 238-263). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Lewandowsky, S., & Smith, P.W. (1983). The effect of increasing the memorability of category instances on estimates of category size. Memory and Cognition, 11, 347-350.
16. Lewicka, M., Czapinski, J., & Peeters, G. (1992). Positive-negative asymmetry or "when the heart needs a reason." European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 425-434.
17. Macey, W.H. (1996). Dealing with the data: Collecting, processing, and analysis. In A. I. Kraut (Ed.), Organizational surveys (pp. 204-232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researchers, 17 (2). 13-17.
19. Mossholder, K.W., Settoon, R.P., Harris, S.G., & Armenakis, A.A. (1995). Measuring emotion in open-ended survey responses: An application of textual data analysis. Journal of Management, 21, 335-355.
20. Patton, M.Q. (2002). The nature of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Peeters, G. (1971). The positive-negative asymmetry: On cognitive consistency and positivity bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 455-474.
22. Rogelberg, S.G., Conway, J.M., Sederburg, M.E., Spitzmller, C., Aziz, S., & Knight, W.E. (2003). Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1104-1114.
23. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E.B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology, 5 (4). 296-320.
24. Schiefer, H.J. (1986). Effect of verbal and nonverbal vividness on students' information processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 1106.
25. Shedler, J., & Manis, M. (1986). Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 26-36.
26. Siem, F. (2005, April). History of survey comments at the Boeing Company. In K. J. Fenlason (Chair). Comments: Where have we been? Where are we going? Symposium conducted at the 20th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
27. Taylor, S.E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1). 67-85.
28. Thompson, L.F., Surface, E.A., Martin, D.L., & Sanders, M.G. (2003). From paper to pixels: Moving personnel surveys to the Web. Personnel Psychology, 56, 197-227.
29. Todd, Z., Nerlich, B., McKeown, S., & Clarke, D. D. (Eds.). (2004). Mixing methods in psychology: The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. New York: Psychology Press.
30. von Eye, A., & Mun, E.Y. (2005). Analyzing rater agreement: Manifest variable methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.