Frequency-dependent tactile responses in rat brain measured by functional MRI

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 410-416

  Sanganahalli, Basavaraju G ^a   Herman, Peter ^a,c   Hyder, Fahmeed ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

^c SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Activation; Deactivation; Hyperemia; Integration; Multi sensory

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TISSUE;

HYPEREMIA; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULATION FREQUENCY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

OXYGEN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FOREFOOT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; VIBRISSA;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TOUCH; VIBRISSAE;

RATTUS;

EID: 44649186287     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1259     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Benveniste H, Blackband SJ. Translational neuroscience and magnetic-resonance microscopy. Lancet. Neurol. 2006; 5(6): 536-544.
2. Kida I, Hyder F. Physiology of functional magnetic resonance imaging: energetics and function. Methods Mol. Med. 2006; 124: 175-195.
3. Gyngell ML, Bock C, Schmitz B, Hoehn-Berlage M, Hossmann KA. Variation of functional MRI signal in response to frequency of somatosensory stimulation in alpha-chloralose anesthetized rats. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996; 36(1): 13-15.
4. Van Camp N, Verhoye M, Van der Linden A. Stimulation of the rat somatosensory cortex at different frequencies and pulse widths. NMR Biomed. 2006; 19(1): 10-17.
5. Huang W, Plyka I, Li H, Eisenstein EM, Volkow ND, Springer CS Jr. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detection of the murine brain response to light: temporal differentiation and negative functional MRI changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996; 93(12): 6037-6042.
6. Yang X, Hyder F, Shulman RG. Functional MRI BOLD signal coincides with electrical activity in the rat whisker barrels. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997; 38(6): 874-877.
7. Van Camp N, Verhoye M, De Zeeuw CI, Van der Linden A. Light stimulus frequency dependence of activity in the rat visual system as studied with high-resolution BOLD fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 2006; 95(5): 3164-3170.
8. Kida I, Xu F, Shulman RG, Hyder F. Mapping at glomerular resolution: fMRI of rat olfactory bulb. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 48(3): 570-576.
9. Martin C, Grenier D, Thevenet M, et al. fMRI visualization of transient activations in the rat olfactory bulb using short odor stimulations. Neuroimage 2007; 36(4): 1288-1293.
10. Hyder F. Neuroimaging with calibrated fMRI. Stroke 2004; 35 (11 Suppl. 1): 2635-2641.
11. Silva AC. Perfusion-based fMRI: insights from animal models. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005; 22(6): 745-750.
12. Chen Z, Shen J. Single-shot echo-planar functional magnetic resonance imaging of representations of the fore- and hindpaws in the somatosensory cortex of rats using an 11.7 T microimager. J. Neurosci. Methods 2006; 151(2): 268-275.
13. Schafer JR, Kida I, Xu F, Rothman DL, Hyder F. Reproducibility of odor maps by fMRI in rodents. Neuroimage 2006; 31(3): 1238-1246.
14. Buerk DG, Ances BM, Greenberg JH, Detre JA. Temporal dynamics of brain tissue nitric oxide during functional forepaw stimulation in rats. Neuroimage 2003; 18(1): 1-9.
15. Jones M, Berwick J, Johnston D, Mayhew J. Concurrent optical imaging spectroscopy and laser-Doppler flowmetry: the relationship between blood flow, oxygenation, and volume in rodent barrel cortex. Neuroimage 2001; 13(6 Pt 1): 1002-1015.
16. Lowe AS, Beech JS, Williams SC. Small animal, whole brain fMRI: innocuous and nociceptive forepaw stimulation. Neuroimage 2007; 35(2): 719-728.
17. Morton DW, Keogh B, Lim K, Maravilla KR. Functional brain imaging using a long intravenous half-life gadolinium-based contrast agent. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(7): 1467-1471.
18. Brinker G, Bock C, Busch E, Krep H, Hossmann KA, Hoehn-Berlage M. Simultaneous recording of evoked potentials and T2*-weighted MR images during somatosensory stimulation of rat. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 41(3): 469-473.
19. Trubel HK, Sacolick LI, Hyder F. Regional temperature changes in the brain during somatosensory stimulation. J. Cereb. Blood. Flow. Metab. 2006; 26(1): 68-78.
20. Yang X, Hyder F, Shulman RG. Activation of single whisker barrel in rat brain localized by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996; 93(1): 475-478.
21. Towe BC. Investigation of a Lorentz force biomagnetometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997; 44(6): 455-461.
22. Lu H, Mazaheri Y, Zhang R, Jesmanowicz A, Hyde JS. Multishot partial-k-space EPI for high-resolution fMRI demonstrated in a rat whisker barrel stimulation model at 3 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003; 50(6): 1215-1222.
23. Moreno A, Garcia-Gonzalez V, Sanchez-Jimenez A, Panetsos F. Principalis, oralis and interpolaris responses to whisker movements provoked by air jets in rats. Neuroreport 2005; 16(14): 1569-1573.
24. Brett-Green BA, Chen-Bee CH, Frostig RD. Comparing the functional representations of central and border whiskers in rat primary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2001; 21(24): 9944-9954.
25. Melzer P, Van der Loos H, Dorfl J, et al. A magnetic device to stimulate selected whiskers of freely moving or restrained small rodents: its application in a deoxyglucose study. Brain Res. 1985; 348(2): 229-240.
26. Strominger RN, Woolsey TA. Templates for locating the whisker area in fresh flattened mouse and rat cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 1987; 22(2): 113-118.
27. Hyder F, Rothman DL, Blamire AM. Image reconstruction of sequentially sampled echo-planar data. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1995; 13(1): 97-103.
28. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 1986; 3(6): 823-833.
29. Frahm J, Haase A, Matthaei D. Rapid three-dimensional MR imaging using the FLASH technique. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1986; 10(2): 363-368.
30. Chahboune H, Ment LR, Stewart WB, Ma X, Rothman DL, Hyder F. Neurodevelopment of C57B/L6 mouse brain assessed by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging. NMR Biomed. 2007; 20(3): 375-382.
31. Mirabella G, Battiston S, Diamond ME. Integration of multiple-whisker inputs in rat somatosensory cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2001; 11(2): 164-170.
32. Moskalenko YE, Dowling JL, Liu D, Rovainen CM, Semernia VN, Woolsey TA. LCBF changes in rat somatosensory cortex during whisker stimulation monitored by dynamic H2 clearance. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1996; 21(1): 45-59.
33. Shimegi S, Ichikawa T, Akasaki T, Sato H. Temporal characteristics of response integration evoked by multiple whisker stimulations in the barrel cortex of rats. J. Neurosci. 1999; 19(22): 10164-10175.
34. Welker C. Microelectrode delineation of fine grain somatotopic organization of (SmI) cerebral neocortex in albino rat. Brain Res. 1971; 26(2): 259-275.
35. Gerrits RJ, Stein EA, Greene AS. Blood flow increases linearly in rat somatosensory cortex with increased whisker movement frequency. Brain Res. 1998; 783(1): 151-157.
36. Moore CI. Frequency-dependent processing in the vibrissa sensory system. J. Neurophysiol. 2004; 91(6): 2390-2399.
37. Alonso BD, Lowe AS, Dear JP, Lee KC, Williams SC, Finnerty GT. Sensory inputs from whisking movements modify cortical whisker maps visualized with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex. 2007 Oct 31 [Epub ahead of print].
38. Weng JC, Chen JH, Yang PF, Tseng WY. Functional mapping of rat barrel activation following whisker stimulation using activity-induced manganese-dependent contrast. Neuroimage 2007; 36(4): 1179-1188.
39. Martin C, Martindale J, Berwick J, Mayhew J. Investigating neural-hemodynamic coupling and the hemodynamic response function in the awake rat. Neuroimage 2006; 32(1): 33-48.
40. Huttunen JK, Grohn O, Penttonen M. Coupling between simultaneously recorded BOLD response and neuronal activity in the rat somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 2008; 39(2): 775-785.
41. Masamoto K, Kim T, Fukuda M, Wang P, Kim SG. Relationship between neural, vascular, and BOLD signals in isoflurane-anesthetized rat somatosensory cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2007; 17(4): 942-950.
42. Ngai AC, Jolley MA, D'Ambrosio R, Meno JR, Winn HR. Frequency-dependent changes in cerebral blood flow and evoked potentials during somatosensory stimulation in the rat. Brain Res. 1999; 837(1-2): 221-228.
43. Sheth SA, Nemoto M, Guiou M, Walker M, Pouratian N, Toga AW. Linear and nonlinear relationships between neuronal activity, oxygen metabolism, and hemodynamic responses. Neuron. 2004; 42(2): 347-355.
44. Ureshi M, Matsuura T, Kanno I. Stimulus frequency dependence of the linear relationship between local cerebral blood flow and field potential evoked by activation of rat somatosensory cortex. Neurosci. Res. 2004; 48(2): 147-153.
45. Meredith MA, Stein BE. Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J. Neurophysiol. 1986; 56(3): 640-662.
46. Meredith MA, Stein BE. Spatial determinants of multisensory integration in cat superior colliculus neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 1996; 75(5): 1843-1857.
47. Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1998; 21: 149-186.