The effects of ambient music on simulated anaesthesia monitoring

Anaesthesia

Volumn 60, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1073-1078

  Sanderson, P M ^a   Tosh, N ^a   Philp, S ^a   Rudie, J ^a   Watson, M O ^a   Russell, W J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MUSIC; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; PITCH; RHYTHM; SIMULATION; TRAINING; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HEARING; STANDARD; TEACHING;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; MUSIC; PATIENT SIMULATION;

EID: 27744433275     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04377.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hodge B, Thompson JF. Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet 1990; 335: 891-4.
2. Weinger MB, Englund CE. Ergonomic and human-factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating-room environment. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 995-1021.
3. Hawksworth C, Asbury AJ, Millar K. Music in theatre: not so harmonious: a survey of attitudes to music played in the operating theatre. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 79-83.
4. Radocy RE, Boyle JD. Psychological foundations of musical behaviour. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1979.
5. Hawksworth C, Sivalingam P, Asbury AJ. The effect of music on anaesthetists' psychomotor performance. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 195-7.
6. Fontaine CW, Schwalm ND. Effects of familiarity of music on vigilant performance. Perception and Motor Skills 1979; 49: 71-4.
7. Allen K, Blascovich J. Effects of music on cardiovascular reactivity among surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 882-4.
8. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A. Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery 2004: 136: 25-30.
9. Loeb RG, Fitch WT. A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002; 94: 362-8.
10. Watson M, Sanderson P. Sonification helps eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task timesharing. Human Factors 2004; 46: 497-517.
11. Fitch WT, Kramer G. Sonifying the body electric: Superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. In: Kramer G, ed. Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.
12. Sanderson P, Watson M, Russell WJ. Advanced patient monitoring displays: Tools for continuous informing. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2005; 101: 161-8.
13. Tierney A, Pisoni DB. Some effects of early musical experience on sequence memory spans. Research on Spoken Language Processing. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 2004.
14. Sanderson P, Shek V, Watson M. The effect of concurrent music on simulated patient monitoring with visual and auditory displays. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Annual Scientific Meeting, 22-24 November. Auckland, NZ: ANZCA, 2005.
15. Sanderson P, Shek V, Watson M. The effect of music on monitoring a simulated anaesthetised patient with sonification. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia (Ozchi2004). Woollongong.