DNA damage and repair in white blood cells at occupational exposure

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Georgieva, R T ^a   Zaharieva, E K ^a   Rupova, I M ^a   Acheva, A R ^a   Nikolov, V N ^a  

^a National Center of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Bulgaria   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649162613     PISSN: 17426588     EISSN: 17426596     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/101/1/012019     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Gilbert E S, Fry S A, Wiggs L D 1989 Analysis of combined mortality data on workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant, - Radiation Research 120 19-35
2. Gribbin M A, Weeks J L, Howe G R 1993 Cancer mortality (1956-1985) among male employees of Atomic Energy Limited with respect to occupational exposure to low-linear energy transfere ionizing radiation. - Radiation Research 133 375-381
3. Kendall G M, Muirhead C R, MacGibbon B H 1992 Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation, First analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. - British Medical J. 304 220-233
4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation. 1994 Sources and Effects of ionizing Radiaation. UNSCEAR Report to the general assembly with scientific Annexes. New York, 1994, Annex B, Adaptive Response to Radiation in cells and organisms 185-272
5. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al 2005 Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. Brit Med J. 331 77-89
6. Gonzalez A 1994 Biological effects of low doses of ionising radiation: A fuller picture IAEA Bulletin 4 37-45
7. Javorovski Z 1994 Hormesis: The beneficial effects of radiation, 21st Century Sci and Techn. 7 (3) 22-27
8. Tubiana M 2003 The carcinogenic effect of low doses: the validity of the linear nothreshold relationship. Int J. Low Radiation 1 1-31
9. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation, Report 2000, Annex G 122-140
10. Pollycove M, Feinendegen L E 2001 Biologic response to low doses of ionizing radiation. - Detriment versus hormesis. - J. Nucl. Medicine 42 9
11. Mitchell S A, Marino S A, Brenner D J, Hall E J 2004 Bystander effect and adaptive response in C3H 10TK cells Int. J. Radiation Biology 80 (7) 465-472
12. Romppanen E, Trott K R, Mustonen R, Leszczynski D, Belyakov O V Studies of Bystander Effect and Intercellular Communication in Human Epithelial Cell Cultures Irradiated with X-rays. - (Gray Cancer Institute, UK)
13. Jayashree B, Devasagayam T P A, Kesavan P C 2001 Low dose radiobiology: Mechanistic considerations Current Sci. 80 (4) 515-523
14. Miura Y 2004 Oxidative stress, radiation-adaptive responses, and aging. - J. Radiat. Res. 45 357-372
15. Hulka B, Wilcosky T 1988 Biological marcers in epidemiologic research Arch. Environ. Health 43 83-89
16. Marinova Tz and Georgieva R 1998 DNA-repair capacity in peripheral blood leukocytes and possibility for evaluation of individual radiosensitivity Compres rendus de l'Academie Bulgare des Sci. 51 (3-4) 103-106
17. Mookerjee B K 1976 Influence of separation techniques on the distribution and function of lymphocyte subpopulations Transplantation 22 101-107
18. Knox, S J, Shierin M and Resenblatt L S 1982 Assessment of the in vitro radiosensitivity of human peripheral blood lymphocytes Radiat Res. 89 575-589
19. Kassie F, Parzefall W and Knasmuller S 2000 Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: a new technique for human biomonitoring studies Mutat Res. 463 13-31
20. Collins A R 2004 The Comet Assay for DNA damage and repair Molecular Biotechnology 26 249-260
21. Mitchell A, et al 1983 Unscheduled DNA synthesis tests, A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gene - Tox Program Mutat. Res. 123 363-410
22. Pero R W, Seidegard J, Miller D G 1986 Development of biochemical markers sensitive to ecogenetic variation and their use in assessing risk from genotoxic exposures in genetic toxicology. In: Assessing risk from genotoxic exposures, part B: Genetic effects and applied mutagenesis Alan. R. Liss, Inc 225-235
23. Mirsalis J S 1982 Use of an in vivo DNA repair assay as an indicator of genotoxic exposure. In: Indicators of genotoxic exposure ed Bridges BA, Butterworth BE, Weinstein IB, eds (Banbury Report 13. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) p 83-99
24. Voiculetz N, Sbenghe M, Sandulescui T 1975 Unscheduled DNA synthesis in human lymphocytes γ-irradiated in vitro and its chemical inhibition. (Studia Biophysica, Berlin) (50) 97-105
25. Buatti J M, Rivero L R, Yorgensen T J 1992 Radiation-induced DNA single-stranbd breaks in freshly isolated human leukocytes. Radiat Res. 132 200-206
26. Gottlieb V, et al 1991 Some aspects of biological effects of low-level radiation doses Radiobiology 31 318-325
27. Mercier G, Berthault N, Mary J et al 2004 Biological detection of low radiation doses by combining results of two microarray analysis methods. Nucl.c Acids Res. 32 12
28. Amundson S A, Bittner M, Fornace A J Jr 2003 Functional genomics as a window on radiation stress signalling. Oncogene 22 (58) 28-33
29. Amundson S A, Lee R A, Koch-Paiz C A, Bittner M L, Meltzer P, Trent J M, Fornace A J, Jr 2003 Differential responses of stress genes to low dose-rate gamma irradiation. Mol Cancer Res. 1 445-452
30. Amundson S A, Do K T, Vinikoor L, et al 2005 Stress-specific signatures: expression profiling of p53 wild-type and - null human cells. Oncogene 24 4572-9
31. Bishay K, Ory K, Olivier M F, Lebeau J, Levalois C, Chevillard S 2001 DNA damagerelated RNA expression to assess individual sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Carcinogenesis 22 1179-83
32. Vilenchik M M, Knudson A G 2000 Inverse radiation dose-rate effects on somatic and germ-line mutations and DNA damage rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97 5381-6
33. Vilenchik M M, Knudson A G 2003 Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 12871-6
34. BEIR report VII 2005
35. Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz L A, nsal-Kaçmaz K, Linn S 2004 Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Ann Rev Biochem 23 (73) 39-85
36. Shiloh Y 2003 ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 155-68
37. Dikomey E, Brammer I 2000 Relationship between cellular radiosensitivity and nonrepaired double-strand breaks studied for different growth states, dose rates and plating conditions in a normal fibroblast line. Int J. Radiat Biol. 76 773-781
38. Rothkamm K, Löbrich M 2003 Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 5057-62
39. Oliveri G and Bosi A 1990 Possible causes of variability of the adaptive response in human lymphocytes, In: Chromosome aberrations ed G Obe and A T Natarajan (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) p 130-139
40. Barquinero J, Barrios L, Caballin M, etal 1995 Occupational exposure to radiation induces an adaptive response in human Lymphocytes Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 67 (2) 187-191
41. Wolff S 1998 The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications. Environ Health Perspect 106 277-283
42. Raleigh J A, Kremers W, Gaboury B 1977 Dose-rate and Oxygen Effects in Models of Lipid Membranes Int. J. Radiation Biology 31 (3) 203-213
43. urović B, Selaković V, Spasić-Jokiæ V 2004 Does occupational exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation induce cell membrane damage? - Arch Oncol. 12 (4) 197-9
44. Zaider M, Bardash M, Fung A 1994 Molecular damage induced directly and indirectly by ionizing radiation in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol. 66 (5) 459-65
45. Dainiak D, Tan B J 1995 Utility of biological membranes as indicators for radiation exposure: alterations in membrane structure and function overtime. Stem Cells 13 142-52