Health information styles among participants in a prostate cancer screening informed decision-making intervention

Health Education Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 440-453

  Williams Piehota, Pamela A ^a   McCormack, Lauren A ^a   Treiman, Katherine ^a   Bann, Carla M ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 44649145951     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyn011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 67-80.
2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
3. Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK et al. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 2004; 101(Suppl. 5):1214-28.
4. Harris R, Lohr KN. Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 917-29.
5. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rational. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 915-33.
6. Chan ECY, Vernon SW, O'Donnell FT et al. Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message? Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 779-85.
7. Gwede CK, McDermott RJ. Prostate cancer screening decision making under controversy: implications for health promotion practice. Health Promot Pract 2006; 7: 134-46.
8. Tu HT, Hargraves JL. Seeking health care information: most consumers still on the sidelines. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change, 2003; 61: 1-4.
9. Rodgers S, Chen Q, Duffy M et al. Media usage as health segmentation variables. J Health Commun 2007; 12: 105-19.
10. National Cancer Institute. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Available at: http://hints.cancer. gov/hints/. Accessed: 6 March 2008.
11. Squiers L, Finney Rutten LJ, Treiman K et al. Cancer patients' information needs across the cancer care continuum: evidence from the cancer information service. J Health Commun 2005; 10(Suppl. 1):15-34.
12. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C et al. Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behavior: indepth interview study. Br Med J 2000; 320: 909-13.
13. Matthews AK, Sellergren SA, Manfredi C et al. Factors influencing medical information seeking among African American cancer patients. J Health Commun 2002; 7: 205-19.
14. Maibach E, Maxfield A, Ladin K et al. Translating health psychology into effective health communication: the American Healthstyles Audience Segmentation Project. J Health Psychol 1996; 1: 261-77.
15. Slater MD. Theory and method in health audience segmentation. J Health Commun 1996; 1: 267-83.
16. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 276-83.
17. Kreuter MW, Oswald DL, Bull FC et al. Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 305-15.
18. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P et al. Computer-tailored nutrition education: differences between two interventions. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 249-56.
19. Williams-Piehota P, Pizarro J, Schneider TR et al. Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 58-67.
20. Updegraff JA, Sherman DK, Luyster FS et al. Understanding how tailored messages work: the effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of health messages. J Exp Soc Psychol 2006; 43: 249-57.
21. Petty RE, Wegener DT. Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. In: Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindsay G (eds). The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1998, 323-90.
22. Navarro FH, Wilkins ST. A new perspective on consumer health Web use: ''valuegraphic'' profiles of health information seekers. Manag Care Q 2001; 9: 35-43.
23. Miller SM, Shoda Y, Hurley K. Applying cognitive-social theory to health-protective behavior: breast self-examination in cancer screening. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 70-94.
24. Shim M, Kelly B, Hornik R. Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. J Health Commun 2006; 11(Suppl. 1):157-72.
25. Maibach EW, Weber D, Massett H et al. Understanding consumers' health information preferences: development and validation of a brief screening instrument. J Health Commun 2006; 11: 717-36.
26. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 941-50.
27. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29: 21-43.
28. Degner LF, Russell CA. Preferences for treatment control in adults with cancer. Res Nurs Health 1988; 11: 367-74.
29. Long JS. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.
30. Hay J, Coups E, Ford J. Predictors of perceived risk for colon cancer in a national probability sample in the United States. J Health Commun 2006; 11(Suppl. 1):71-92.
31. Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Hesse B. Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun 2006; 11(Suppl 1):147-56.
32. Rutten LJ, Augustson E, Wanke K. Factors associated with patients' perceptions of health care providers' communication behavior. J Health Commun 2006; 11(Suppl. 1): 135-46.
33. Treiman K, Squiers L. CIS Research Agenda: Overview of Relevant Research. National Cancer Institute, 2005. NIH Pub. No. 05-5309.
34. Slater MD, Flora JA. Health lifestyles: audience segmentation analysis for public health interventions. Health Educ Q 1991; 18: 221-33.