Valuing rock climbing and bouldering access

The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 21-39

  Grijalva, Therese ^a   Berrens, Robert P ^b  

^a WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649109476     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781950319.00010     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. American Psychological Association (APA) (1974), Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests, Washington, DC: APA.
2. Arrow, K.J., R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993), 'Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation', Federal Register, 58: 4601-14.
3. Berrens, R., A. Bohara, C. Silva,D. Brookshire and M. McKee (2000), 'Contingent values for New Mexico instream flows: with tests of scope, group-size reminder and temporal reliability', Journal of Environmental Management, 58: 73-90.
4. Berrens, R., D. Brookshire, P. Ganderton and M. McKee (1998), 'Exploring nonmarket values for the social impacts of environmental policy change', Resource and Energy Economics, 20: 117-37.
5. Bishop, R., P. Champ and D. Mullarkey (1995), 'Contingent Valuation', in D.W. Bromley (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Economics, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
6. Blamey, R. (1998), 'Decisiveness, attitude expression, and symbolic responses in contingent valuation', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34: 577-601.
7. Bohara, A., M. McKee, R. Berrens, H. Jenkins-Smith, C. Silva and D. Brookshire (1998), 'Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: open-ended versus dichotomous choice', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35: 142-63.
8. Boyle, K. (2002), 'Contingent Valuation in Practice', in P. Champ, K. Boyle and T. Brown (eds), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Kluwer: Boston.
9. Brown, T. and J. Duffield (1995), 'Testing part-whole valuation effects in contingent valuation of instream flows', Water Resources Research, 31: 2341-51.
10. Carson, R.T. (1997), 'Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Scope Insensitivity', in R.J. Kopp,W. Pommerhene and N. Schwartz (eds), Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods, Boston: Kluwer.
11. Carson, R. and R. Mitchell (1995), 'Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28: 155-73.
12. Carson, R., N. Flores, K. Martin and J. Wright (1996), 'Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates from quasi-public goods', Land Economics, 72: 80-99.
13. Carson, R., N. Flores and R. Mitchell (1999), 'The Theory and Measurement of Passive-Use Value', in I.J. Bateman and K.G.Willis (eds), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, New York: The Oxford University Press.
14. Cavlovic, T. (2000), 'Valuing the loss in access: an institutional and welfare analysis of rock climbing on US public lands', Ph.D. Diss., University of New Mexico.
15. Desvouges, W., S. Hudson and M. Ruby (1996), 'Evaluating CV Performance: Separating the Light from the Heat', in D. Bjornstad and J. Kahn (eds), The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs, London: Edward Elgar.
16. Desvouges, W., F.R. Johnson, R. Dunford, K. Boyle, S. Hudson and K. Nicole (1992), Measuring Nonuse Values Using Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy, RTI Monograph, 92-1, Research Triangle, NC: Exxon.
17. Economist (1995), 'Climbing Up the Wall', March 11.
18. Freeman, A.M. (1993), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
19. Goodwin, B., L. Offenbach, T. Cable and P. Cook (1993), 'Discrete/continuous contingent valuation of private hunting access in Kansas', Journal of Environmental Management, 39: 1-12.
20. Greene, W. (1997), Econometric Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
21. Grijalva, T., R. Berrens, A. Bohara and W.D. Shaw (2002a), 'Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(2): 401-14.
22. Grijalva, T., R. Berrens, A. Bohara, P. Jakus and W.D. Shaw (2002b), 'Valuing the loss of access to rock climbing in wilderness areas: a national-level random utility model', Land Economics, 78(1): 103-20.
23. Halstead, J., B. Lindsay and C. Brown (1991), 'Use of the Tobit model in contingent valuation: experimental evidence from the Pemigewasset wilderness area', Journal of Environmental Management, 33: 79-89.
24. Hanley, N., B. Alvarez-Farizio and W.D. Shaw (2002), 'Rationing an open-access resource: mountaineering in Scotland', Land Use Policy, forthcoming.
25. Hanley, N., G. Koop, R.Wright and B. Alvarez-Farizio (2001), 'Go climb a mountain: an application of recreation demand models to rock climbing in Scotland', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(1).
26. Hueco Tanks State Historic Park (1997), Hueco Tanks SHP Resource Management Plan, draft 3.2.
27. Kahneman,D. and J. Knetsch (1992), 'Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22: 57-70.
28. Loomis, J. (1993), Integrated Public Lands Management: Principles and Applications to National Forests, Parks, Wildlife Refuges, and BLM Lands, New York, NY: Columbia Press.
29. Loomis, J. (1999), 'Contingent Valuation Methodology and the US Institutional Framework', in I. Bateman and K. Willis (eds), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. List, J. and C. Gallet (2001), 'What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?', Environmental and Resource Economics, 20: 241-59.
31. McLave, J. and F. Deitrich (1985), Statistics, 3rd edn, San Francisco: Dellen Publishing.
32. Mitchell, C.M. and R.T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
33. Rosenberger,R. and J. Loomis (2001), 'Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Use Values: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan' (2000 Revision), Gen. Tech. Report. RMRS-GTR-72, Fort Collins, CO: US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service.
34. Schlacter, B. (1999), 'Rock Art vs. Rock Climbers Limits on Use of State Park Protected', Fort Worth Star Telegram, October, Pg. 1.
35. Schulze, W., G. McClelland, D. Waldman and J. Lazo (1996), 'Sources of Bias in Contingent Valuation', in D. Bjornstad, and J. Kahn (eds), The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
36. Shaw,W.D. and P. Jakus (1996), 'Travel cost models of the demand for rock climbing', Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 25(2): 133-42.
37. Smith, V.K. (2000), 'JEEM and nonmarket valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39: 351-74.
38. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) (1997), Hueco Tanks State Historical Park Draft Public Use Plan, Austin, TX.
39. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) (1998), Hueco Tanks State Historical Park Public Use Plan, Austin, TX.
40. US National Park Service (NPS) (1993), Federal Register, 58(112): 32878-80.
41. Whitehead, J., T. Haab and J. Huang (1998), 'Part-whole bias in contingent valuation: will scope effects be detected with inexpensive survey methods', Southern Economic Journal, 65: 160-68.