JEEM and non-market valuation: 1974-1998

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 351-374

  Smith, V K ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Editorial impact; Non market valuation

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; METHODOLOGY;

EID: 0034044844     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1999.1111     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. W. Adamowicz J. Louviere M. Williams Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities J. Environ. Econom. Management 26 1994 271 292
2. A. Alberini M. Cropper T.T. Fu A. Krupnick J.T. Liu D. Shaw W. Harrington Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: The case of Taiwan J. Environ. Econom. Management 34 1997 107 127
3. S.P. Anderson A. dePalma J. Thisse A representative consumer theory of the logit model Internat. Econom. Rev. 29 1988 461 466
4. K. Arrow R. Solow P.R. Portney E.E. Leamer R. Radner H. Schuman Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation Federal Register 58 1993 4601 4614
5. T.J. Bartik Evaluating the benefits of non-marginal reductions in pollution using information on defensive expenditures J. Environ. Econom. Management 15 1988 111 127
6. G.S. Becker A theory of the allocation of time Econom. J. 75 1965 493 517
7. G.S. Becker C.B. Mulligan The endogeneous determination of time preference Quart. J. Econom. 112 1997 729 758
8. F. W. Bell, and, V. R. Leeworthy, An economic analysis of the importance of saltwater beaches in Florida, Sea Grant Report, SGR-82, Feb. 1986.
9. F.W. Bell V.R. Leeworthy Recreational demand by tourists for saltwater beach days J. Environ. Econom. Management 18 1990 189 205
10. S. Berry J. Levinsohn A. Pakes Automobile prices in market equilibrium Econometrica 63 1995 841 890
11. N. E. Bockstael, A. M. Freeman, III, R. J. Kopp, P. R. Portney, and, V. K. Smith, On measuring economic values for nature, Environmental Science and Technology, in press.
12. N. E. Bockstael, W. M. Hanemann, and, I. Strand, Measuring the benefits of water quality improvements using recreation demand models, Report to, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, Oct. 1986.
13. N.E. Bockstael C.L. Kling Valuing environmental quality: Weak complementarity with sets of goods Amer. J. Agricult. Econom. 70 1988 654 662
14. N.E. Bockstael K.E. McConnell Theory and estimation of the household production function for wildlife recreation J. Environ. Econom. Management 8 1981 199 214
15. N.E. Bockstael K.E. McConnell Public goods as characteristics of non-market commodities Econom. J. 103 1993 1244 1257
16. D.S. Brookshire B.C. Ives W.D. Schulze The valuation of aesthetic preferences J. Environ. Econom. Management 3 1976 325 346
17. O.R. Burt D. Brewer Estimation of net social benefit from outdoor recreation Econometrica 39 1971 813 827
18. T.A. Cameron Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of non-market goods Land Econom. 68 1992 302 317
19. T.A. Cameron A consistent paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression J. Environ. Econom. Management 15 1988 1355 1379
20. T. A. Cameron, Credibility of information sources and the formation of individuals' option prices for climate change mitigation, unpublished working paper, Department of Economics, University of California at Los Angeles, Sept. 1997.
21. R.T. Carson N.E. Flores W.M. Hanemann Sequencing and valuing public goods J. Environ. Econom. Management 36 1998 314 323
22. R.T. Carson R.C. Mitchell Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys J. Environ. Econom. Management 28 1995 155 173
23. D.J. Chapman W.M. Hanemann P. Ruud The American Trader oil spill: A view from the beaches AERE Newsletter Nov. 1998 12 25
24. L. G. Chestnut, and, R. D. Rowe, Preservation value for visibility protection at the national parks, draft final report to, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RCG/Hagler Bailly, 1990.
25. S.V. Ciriacy-Wantrup Capital returns from soil conservation practices J. Farm Econom. 29 1947 1181 1196
26. R. Costanza R.C. d'Arge R. deGroot S. Farber M. Grasso B. Hannon K. Limburg S. Naeem R.V. O'Neill J. Paruelo R.G. Roskin P. Sutton M. van den Belt The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 1997 253 260
27. P.N. Courant R. Porter Averting expenditures and the cost of pollution J. Environ. Econom. Management 8 1981 321 329
28. R. K. Davis, The value of outdoor recreation: An economic study of the Maine woods, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1963.
29. L. Deck Visibility at the Grand Canyon and the Navajo Generating Station R.D. Morgenstern Economic Analyses at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact 1997 Resources for the Future Washington
30. W. Desvousges F.R. Johnson H.S. Banzhaf Environmental Policy Analysis With Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method 1998 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
31. T.A. Deyak V.K. Smith Congestion and participation in outdoor recreation: A household production function approach J. Environ. Econom. Management 5 1978 63 80
32. P.A. Diamond J.A. Hausman Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number J. Econom. Perspect. 8 1994 45 64
33. P.A. Diamond Testing the internal consistency of contingent valuation surveys J. Environ. Econom. Management 30 1996 337 347
34. R.W. Dunford The American Trader oil spill: An alternative view of recreation use damage AERE Newsletter May 1996 12 20
35. U. Ebert Evaluation of non-market goods: Recovering unconditional preferences Amer. J. Agricult. Econom. 80 1998 241 254
36. D. Epple H. Sieg Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions J. Polit. Economy 107 1999 645 681
37. J. A. Espinosa, Consistent general equilibrium measurement of the net benefit for improving environmental quality: A computable general equilibrium analysis of the European Community, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, 1996.
38. P.M. Feather D. Hellerstein T. Tomasi A discrete-count model of recreation demand J. Environ. Econom. Management 29 1995 214 227
39. A.M. Freeman III On estimating air pollution control benefits from land value studies J. Environ. Econom. Management 1 1974 74 83
40. A.M. Freeman III The Benefits of Environmental Improvement, Theory and Practice 1979 Johns Hopkins Baltimore
41. A.M. Freeman III The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods 1993 Resources for the Future Washington
42. A. M. Freeman, III, Notes for valuing nature workshop: Commentary on methods and data used by Costanza, et al. , Working paper prepared for the, Bowdoin College, Environmental Studies Program Worship on Valuing Nature, 1998.
43. T.C. Haab R.L. Hicks Accounting for choice set endogeneity in random utility models of recreation demand J. Environ. Econom. Management 34 1997 107 127
44. W. M. Hanemann, A methodological and empirical study of recreation benefits from water quality improvements, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1978.
45. W.M. Hanemann Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses Amer. J. Agricult. Econom. 66 1984 332 341
46. W.M. Hanemann Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand Econometrica 52 1984 541 563
47. W. M. Hanemann, Expert report regarding the American trader oil spill, unpublished, Dec. 4, 1994.
48. W.M. Hanemann Valuing the environment through contingent valuation J. Econom. Perspect. 8 1994 19 44
49. D. Harrison D.L. Rubinfeld Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air J. Environ. Econom. Management 5 1978 81 102
50. J. Hausman Exact consumer's surplus and deadweight loss Amer. Econom. Rev. 71 1981 662 676
51. J. Hausman G. Leonard D. McFadden A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and court data model: Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage J. Public Econom. 56 1995 1 30
52. M. Hazilla R.J. Kopp Social cost of environmental quality regulations: A general equilibrium analysis J. Polit. Economy 98 1990 853 873
53. J.A. Herriges C.L. Kling Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models 1999 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
54. F.R. Johnson E.E. Fries H.S. Banzhaf Valuing morbidity: An integration of the willingness to pay and health status index literatures J. Health Econom. 16 1997 641 665
55. F. R. Johnson, M. C. Ruby, W. H. Desvousges, and, J. R. King, Using stated preferences and health-state classifications to estimate the value of health effects of air pollution, final report to, Environment Canada, Health Canada, Ontario Hydro, and Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Triangle Economic Research, Durham, NC, March 31, 1998.
56. D. Kahneman J. Knetsch Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction J. Environ. Econom. Management 22 1992 57 70
57. Y. Kaoru V.K. Smith J.L. Liu Using random utility models to estimate the recreational value of estuarine resources Amer. J. Agricult. Econom. 77 1995 141 151
58. C.L. Kling Comparing welfare estimates of environmental air quality changes from recreation demand models J. Environ. Econom. Management 15 1988 331 340
59. A. Krupnick W. Harrington B. Ostro Ambient ozone and acute health effects: Evidence from daily data J. Environ. Econom. Management 18 1990 1 18
60. D.N. Laband M.J. Piette The relative impact of economics journals: 1970–1990 J. Econom. Lit. 32 1994 640 667
61. J.T. LaFrance W.M. Hanemann The dual structure of incomplete demand systems Amer. J. Agricult. Econom. 71 1989 262 274
62. D.M. Larson Recovering weakly separable preferences J. Environ. Econom. Management 21 1991 97 108
63. L.B. Lave E.P. Seskin Air pollution and human health Science 169 1970 723 733
64. L.B. Lave E.P. Seskin An analysis of the association between U.S. mortality and air pollution J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68 1973 284 290
65. L.B. Lave E.P. Seskin Air Pollution and Human Health 1976 Johns Hopkins University Baltimore
66. D.S. Levy J.K. Hammitt N. Duan T. Downes-LeGuin D. Friedman Conceptual and Statistical Issues in Contingent Valuation: Estimating the Value of Altered Visibility in the Grand Canyon 1995 Rand Corporation Santa Monica
67. S.J. Liebowitz J.C. Palmer Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals J. Econom. Lit. 22 1984 77 88
68. K.G. Mäler Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry 1974 Johns Hopkins Baltimore
69. K.G. Mäler Welfare economics and the environment A.V. Kneese J.L. Sweeney Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics 1985 North Holland Amsterdam 1
70. K.E. McConnell Models for referendum data, the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation J. Environ. Econom. Management 18 1990 19 34
71. D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior P. Zarembka Frontiers in Econometrics 1974 Academic Press New York
72. W. J. Meade, Review and analysis of recent state-of-the-art contingent valuation studies, paper presented at Symposium on Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, April 2–3, 1992, Washington, DC, 1992.
73. H. Mohring Alternative welfare gain and loss measures Western Econom. J. 9 1971 349 368
74. E. Morey Confuser surplus Amer. Econom. Rev. 74 1984 163 173
75. E. Morey D. Shaw R. Rowe A discrete choice model of recreation participation, set choice and activity valuation when complete trip data are not available J. Environ. Econom. Management 20 1991 181 201
76. J.R. Neill Another theorem on using market demands to determine willingness to pay for non-traded goods J. Environ. Econom. Management 15 1988 224 232
77. M. Niklitschek J. León Combining intended demand and yes/no responses in the estimation of contingent valuation models J. Environm. Econom. Management 31 1996 387 402
78. B.D. Ostro Air pollution and morbidity revisited: A specification test J. Environ. Econom. Management 14 1987 87 98
79. G.R. Parsons P. Jakus T. Tomasi A comparison of welfare estimates from four models in linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial logit models of site choice J. Environ. Econom. Management 38 1999 143 157
80. G.R. Parsons A.B. Hauber Random utility model of recreation demand Land Econom. 74 1998 32 48
81. G.R. Parsons M.J. Kealy A demand theory for number of trips in a random utility model of recreation J. Environ. Econom. Management 29 1995 357 367
82. T. Peters W.L. Adamowicz P.C. Boxall Influence of choice set considerations in modeling the benefits from improved water quality Water Resources Res. 1995 1781 1786
83. B. Provencher R.C. Bishop An estimable dynamic model of recreation behavior with application to Great Lakes angling J. Environ. Econom. Management 33 1997 107 128
84. A. Randall J.D. Hoehn Embedding in market demand systems J. Environ. Econom. Management 30 1996 369 380
85. A. Randall B. Ives C. Eastman Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements J. Environ. Econom. Management 1 1974 132 149
86. A. Randall J. Stoll Consumer's surplus in commodity space Amer. Econom. Rev. 70 1980 449 455
87. R. Ridker J. Henning The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution Rev. Econom. Statist. 49 1967 246 257
88. S. Rosen Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in perfect competition J. Polit. Economy 82 1974 34 55
89. R.D. Rowe L.G. Chestnut The Value of Visibility: Theory and Applications 1982 Abt Books Cambridge
90. R.D. Rowe R.C. d'Arge D. Brookshire An experiment on the economic value of visibility J. Environ. Econom. Management 7 1980 1 19
91. R. D. Rowe, E. R. Morey, A. D. Ross, and W. D. Shaw, Valuing marine recreation fishing on the Pacific coast, prepared by Energy and Resource Consultants Inc., Boulder, CO, for National Marine Fisheries ServiceMarch, 1985.
92. C. Sellar J.P. Chavas J.R. Stoll Specification of the Logit Model: The Case of Valuation of Non-Market Goods J. Environ. Econom. Management 13 1986 382 390
93. P. Shapiro T. Smith Preferences for non-market goods revealed through market demands V.K. Smith Advances in Applied Micro Economics 1981 JAI Press Greenwich
94. W. D. Shaw, and, J. S. Shonkwiler, Current approaches to aggregation of conditional recreational demand systems, unpublished paper, Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Reno, Reno, NV, Feb. 1998.
95. J.F. Shogren G.C. Durden The first 15 years: Contributors and contributions of the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management : 1974–1988 J. Environ. Econom. Management 20 1991 205 209
96. D.T. Slesnick Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare J. Econom. Lit. 36 1998 2108 2165
97. K.A. Small H.S. Rosen Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models Econometrica 49 1981 105 130
98. V.K. Smith Household production and environmental benefit measurement J. Braden C. Kolstad Measuring the Demand for Environmental Improvement 1991 North Holland Amsterdam
99. V.K. Smith Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts J. Environ. Econom. Management 22 1992 71 89
100. V.K. Smith Rethinking the rithmetic of damage assessment J. Policy Anal. Management 12 1993 589 595
101. V. K. Smith, Combining discrete choice and count data models: A comment, unpublished paper, Center for Environmental and Resource Economics, Duke University, Nov. 1996.
102. V.K. Smith Pricing what is priceless: A status report on non-market valuation of environmental resources H. Folmer T. Tietenberg International Yearbook of Environmental and Resources Economics 1997/1998 1997 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
103. V.K. Smith W.H. Desvousges Risk communication and the value of information: Radon as a case study Rev. Econom. Statist. 72 1990 137 142
104. V.K. Smith W.H. Desvousges F.R. Johnson A. Fisher Communicating radon risk effectively: A mid-course evaluation 1987 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington
105. V.K. Smith J.C. Huang Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models J. Polit. Economy 103 1995 209 227
106. V.K. Smith L.L. Osborne Do contingent valuation estimates pass a “Scope” test? A meta-analysis J. Environ. Econom. Management 31 1996 287 301
107. V. K. Smith, and, G. Van Houtven, Non-market valuation and the household, working paper, 1998.
108. V. K. Smith, G. L. Van Houtven, S. Pattanayak, and, T. Bingham, Improving the practice of benefit transfer: A preference calibration approach, draft report to, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sept. 1998.
109. V.K. Smith R. von Haefen Welfare measurement and representative consumer theory Econom. Lett. 57 1997 63 67
110. The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act 1990, 1970–1990 1997 Office of Air and Radiation
111. W.K. Viscusi W.A. Magat J. Huber Pricing environmental health risks, survey assessments of risk–risk and risk dollar tradeoffs for chronic bronchitis J. Environ. Econom. Management 21 1991 32 51
112. R. Willig Consumer's surplus without apology Amer. Econom. Rev. 66 1976 589 597
113. R. Willig Incremental consumer's surplus and hedonic price adjustment J. Econom. Theory 17 1978 227 253