Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity

Health Education Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 402-413

  Smeets, Tamara ^a   Brug, J ^b   De Vries, H ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MOTIVATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; COMPUTERS; DEMOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 44649094011     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl101     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bouchard C, Stephard RJ, Stephens T et al. Exercise, Fitness and Health. Champaign, IL: Human Kietics Books, 1990.
2. Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273: 402-7.
3. USDHHS. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.
4. Ooijendijk W, Hildebrandt V, Stiggelbout M (eds). Trendrapport Bewegen en Gezondheid 2000/2001. [Tendency Report Physical Activity and Health 2000/2001.] Heerhugowaard: PlantijnCasparie, 2002.
5. Ronda G, Van Assema P, Brug J. Stages of change, psychological factors and awareness of physical activity levels in the Netherlands. Health Promot Int 2001; 16: 305-14.
6. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 6: 992-1008.
7. Napolitano MA, Marcus BH. Targeting and tailoring physical activity information using print and information technologies. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002; 30: 122-8.
8. Ban AVD, Hawkins H. Agricultural Extensions. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1996.
9. De Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 99-105.
10. Kreuter M, Farrell D, Olevitch L et al. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2000.
11. Skinner C, Campbell M, Rimer B et al. How effective is tailored print communication. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 290-8.
12. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 1028S-34S.
13. Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM et al. Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med 1998; 20: 174-80.
14. Bock BC, Marcus BH, Pinto BM et al. Maintenance of physical activity following an individualized motivationally tailored intervention. Ann Behav Med 2001; 23: 79-87.
15. Peterson T, Aldana S. Improving exercise behavior: an application of the stage of change model in a worksite setting. Am J Health Promot 1999; 13: 22-932.
16. Bull F, Kreuter M, Scharff D. Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 181-95.
17. Van Sluijs E, Van Poppel M, Twisk J et al. The positive effect on determinants of physical activity of a tailored, general practice-based physical activity intervention. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 345-56.
18. Marcus B, Emmons K, Simkin-Silverman L et al. Evaluation of motivationally tailored vs. standard self-help physical activity interventions at the work place. Am J Health Promot 1998; 12: 246-53.
19. Hooker S, Napolitano MA, Dutton G et al. Results from a tailored physical activity intervention for older adults delivered via direct mail: 1094:9:15 AM-9:30 AM. 2006; 38: S119-20.
20. Bull F, Jamrozik K, Blanksby B. Tailored advice on exercise-does it make a difference? Am J Prev Med 1999; 16: 230-9.
21. van Sluijs E, Twisk JW, Calfas KJ et al. Effects of a tailored physical activity intervention delivered in general practice settings: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2005; 95: 1825-31.
22. Brug J, Van Assema P. Differences in use and impact of computer-tailored dietary fat-feedback according to stage of change and education. Appetite 2000; 34: 285-93.
23. Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J et al. Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. Health Psychol 1998; 17: 513-9.
24. De Vries H, Mudde A, Leijs I et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 611-26.
25. Fishbein R, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
26. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New York: Prentice Hall, 1986.
27. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: towards an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51: 390-5.
28. Weinstein N. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 355-86.
29. Lechner L, De Vries H. Starting participation in an employee fitness program: attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. Prev Med 1995; 24: 627-33.
30. Wendel-Vos G, Schuit A, Saris Wet al. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1163-9.
31. Dijkstra A, De Vries H. The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 193-203.
32. Hildebrandt V, Proper K, Urlings I. Lichamelijke activiteit, fitheid en gezondheid van werkenden. Resultaten van de Nationale Gezondheidstest 1999-2000. [Physical activity, condition and health of employees. Results of the national health test 1999-2000.] In: Ooijendijk W, Hildebrandt V, Stiggelbout M (eds). Trendrapport bewegen en gezondheid 2000/2001. [Tendency Report Physical Activity and Health 2000/2001.] Heerhugowaard: PlantijnCasparie, 2002, 25-36.
33. Petty RE, Wegener DT. Attitude change. In: Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G (eds). The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
34. Brug J, Glanz K, Van Assema P et al. The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit and vegetable intake. Health Educ Behav 1998; 25: 517-31.
35. Dijkstra M, Mesters I, De Vries H et al. Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 791-802.
36. Murphy P, Long J, Holleran T et al. Persuasion online or on paper: a new take on an old issue. Learn Instr 2003; 13: 511-32.
37. Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored intervention; main effects and mediators. Ann Behav Med 2005; 29: 54-63.
38. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J. Tailoring dietary feedback to reduce fat intake: an intervention at the family level. Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 449-62.
39. Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J. Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 1998; 13: 207-14.