Prevalence and characteristics of late postoperative voiding dysfunction in early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 387-389

  Charoenkwan, Kittipat ^a   Pranpanas, Savitree ^a  

^a Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bladder dysfunction; Cervical cancer; Radical hysterectomy; Vesical dysfunction; Voiding dysfunction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MICTURITION DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; URINATION DISORDERS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 44449172138     PISSN: 15137368     EISSN: 2476762X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G, et al (1991). Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 42, 116-9.
2. Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, et al (1999). Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med, 340, 1383-9.
3. Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP, et al (2002). Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the uterine supporting ligaments. J Soc Gynecol Investig, 9, 47-56.
4. Deerasamee S, Srivatanakul P (1999). Cervix Uteri. In: Deerasamee S, Martin N, Sontipong S, Sriamporn S, Sriplung H, Srivatanakul P, editors. Cancer in Thailand, 1992-1994. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, pp 56-9.
5. Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, et al (2003). Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat, 25, 200-6.
6. Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y (2003). A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 33, 589-91.
7. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al (1997). Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet, 350, 535-40.
8. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al (2001). Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol, 80, 3-12.
9. Lin HH, Yu HJ, Sheu BC, et al (2001). Importance of urodynamic study before radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 81, 270-2.
10. Maas CP, Trimbos JB, DeRuiter MC, et al (2003). Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 48, 271-9.
11. Maas CP, Kenter GG, Trimbos JB, et al (2005). Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 84, 868-74.
12. Newton M (1975). Radical hysterectomy or radiotherapy for stage I cervical cancer. A prospective comparison with 5 and 10 years follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 123, 535-42.
13. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al (2004). Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol, 93, 307- 14.
14. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al (2006). Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol, 102, 256- 62.
15. Srisomboon J (2004). Epidemiology. Cervical cancer: diagnosis and management. 1st ed. Bangkok: P.B. Foreign Books Center, pp 1-12.
16. Tamussino K, Winter R, Lang PFJ (1997). The cardinal ligament: surgical anatomy and resection. CME J Gynecol Oncol, 6, 265-71.
17. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, et al (2001). A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 11, 180-6.
18. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, et al (2000). Radical hysterectomy: An anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol, 77, 155-63.
19. Yabuki Y, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, et al (2005). Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193, 7-15.
20. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, et al (2003). Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 48, 287-93.