Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Toward a resolution of the lek paradox

Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1317-1334

  Zhou, Yihong ^a   Kuster, Heidi K ^a   Pettis, Jeffrey S ^b   Danka, Robert G ^c   Gleason, Jennifer M ^a   Greenfield, Michael D ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b USDA ARS Bee Research Laboratory   (United States)

^c USDA ARS Honey Bee Breeding Genetics and Physiology Research Laboratory   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Mate choice; Phenotypic plasticity; Sexual selection; Signal evolution

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; LEK; MATE CHOICE; MOTH; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL; SONG;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPERATURE; UNITED STATES; VOCALIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE; LOUISIANA; MALE; MARYLAND; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MOTHS; TEMPERATURE; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ACHROIA GRISELLA; LEPIDOPTERA; PYRALIDAE;

EID: 44449170514     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00371.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Astles, P. A., A. J. Moore, and R. F. Preziosi. 2006. A comparison of methods to estimate cross-environment genetic correlates. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 114 122.
3. Azzalini, A., and D. R. Cox. 1984. Two new tests associated with analysis of variance. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 46 : 335 343.
4. Baker, R. J. 1988. Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68 : 405 410.
5. Bakker, T. C. M., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8 : 129 171.
6. Bonduriansky, R., and C. E. Brassil. 2002. Rapid and costly ageing in wild male flies. Nature 420 : 377.
7. Bonduriansky, R., and C. E. Brassil. 2005. Reproductive aging and sexual selection on male body size in a wild population of antler flies (Protopiophila litigata). J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 1332 1340.
8. Brandt, L. S. E., and M. D. Greenfield. 2004. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song. J. Evol. Biol. 17 : 821 828.
9. Brooks, R. 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406 : 67 70.
10. Brooks, R., and J. A. Endler. 2001. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55 : 1644 1655.
11. Charlesworth, B. 1988. The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment. J. Theor. Biol. 130 : 191 204.
12. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes. 2000. The maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits. Pp. 369 392 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas eds., Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology, Vol. 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Collins, R. D., Y. Jang, K. Reinhold, and M. D. Greenfield. 1999. Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signaling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Heredity 83 : 644 651.
14. Cornelius, P. L., M. Seyedsadr, and J. Crossa. 1992. Using the shifted multiplicative model to search for 'separability' in crop cultivar trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84 : 61 172.
15. Danielson-François, A., J. K. Kelly, and M. D. Greenfield. 2006. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 532 542.
16. Ellner, S. and N. G. Hairston Jr. 1994. Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic variation in a fluctuating environment. Am. Nat. 143 : 403 417.
17. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th edn. Longman, Essex.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1976. The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Annu. Rev. Genet. 10 : 253 280.
19. Fitzpatrick, M. J., E. Feder, L. Rowe, and M. B. Sokolowski. 2007. Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature 447 : 210 212.
20. Fry, J. D. 1992. The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 46 : 540 550.
21. Fry, J. D., S. L. Heinsohn, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. The contribution of new mutations to genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50 : 2316 2327.
22. Gillespie, J. H., and M. Turelli. 1989. Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121 : 129 138.
23. Greenfield, M. D., and J. A. Coffelt. 1983. Reproductive behaviour of the lesser wax moth, Achroia grisella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae): signalling, pair formation, male interactions, and mate guarding. Behaviour 84 : 287 315.
24. Greenfield, M. D., and C. Medlock. 2007. Temperature coupling as an emergent property: parallel thermal effects on male song and female response do not contribute to species recognition in an acoustic moth. Evolution 61 : 1590 1599.
25. Greenfield, M. D., and R. L. Rodriguez. 2004. Genotype × environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim. Behav. 68 : 1461 1468.
26. Groeters, F. R. 1988. Relationship between observed components of variance and causal components of variance in a split-family, half-sib, full-sib analysis. Evolution 42 : 631 633.
27. Hawthorne, D. J. 1997. Ecological history and evolution in a novel environment: habitat heterogeneity and insect adaptation to a new host. Evolution 51 : 153 162.
28. Hine, E., S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2004. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58 : 2754 2762.
29. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially-rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6 : 65 70.
30. Hunt, J., L. F. Bussière, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2004. What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evolution 19 : 329 333.
31. Jang, Y., and M. D. Greenfield. 1996. Ultrasonic communication and sexual selection in wax moths: female choice based on energy and asynchrony of male signals. Anim. Behav. 51 : 1095 1106.
32. Jang, Y., and M. D. Greenfield. 1998. Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to mate attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Evolution 52 : 1383 1393.
33. Jang, Y., and M. D. Greenfield. 2000. Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal. Heredity 84 : 73 80.
34. Jang, Y., R. D. Collins, and M. D. Greenfield. 1997. Variation and repeatability of ultrasonic sexual advertisement signals in Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Insect Behav. 10 : 87 98.
35. Jennions, M. D., A. P. Møller, and M. Petrie. 2001. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q. Rev. Biol. 76 : 3 36.
36. Jia, F. Y., and M. D. Greenfield. 1997. When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264 : 1057 1063.
37. Jia, F. Y., M. D. Greenfield, and R. D. Collins. 2000. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype × environment interaction. Evolution 54 : 953 967.
38. Kassen, R. 2002. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 173 190.
39. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350 : 33 38.
40. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, and J. L. Tomkins. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410 : 684 686.
41. Künike, G. 1930. Zur biologie der kleinen wachsmotte, Achroia grisella Fabr. Z. Angew. Entomol. 16 : 304 356.
42. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37 : 1210 1226.
43. Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY.
44. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
45. Mackay, T. F. C. 1981. Genetic variation in varying environments. Genet. Res. 37 : 79 93.
46. Meffert, L. M., and J. L. Regan. 2002. A test of speciation via sexual selection on female preferences. Anim. Behav. 64 : 955 965.
47. Mills, S. C., R. V. Alatalo, E. Koskela, J. Mappes and T. A. Oksanen. 2007. Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation. Evolution 61 : 1748 1757.
48. Milum, V. G. 1940. Moth pests of honey bee combs. Glean. Bee Cult. 68 : 424 428.
49. Olvido, A. E., and T. A. Mousseau. 1995. Effect of rearing environment on calling-song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution 49 : 1271 1277.
50. Qvarnström, A. 1999. Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53 : 1564 1572.
51. Qvarnström, A. 2001. Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 5 7.
52. Rauter, C. M., and A. J. Moore. 2002. Quantitative genetics of growth and development time in the burying beetle Nicrophorus pustulatus in the presence and absence of post-hatching parental care. Evolution 56 : 96 110.
53. Reinhold, K., M. D. Greenfield, Y. Jang, and A. Broce. 1998. Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in waxmoths. Anim. Behav. 55 : 905 913.
54. Rodriguez, R. L., and M. D. Greenfield. 2003. Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57 : 1304 1313.
55. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
56. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263 : 1415 1421.
57. Santos, M., K. T. Eisses, and A. Fontdevila. 1999. Competition and genotype-by-environment interaction in natural breeding substrates of Drosophila. Evolution 53 : 175 186.
58. Scheuber, H., A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhoff. 2004. Female preference for multiple condition-dependent components of a sexually-selected signal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 : 2453 2457.
59. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
60. Slatkin, M. 1978. Spatial patterns in the distribution of polygenic characters. J. Theor. Biol. 70 : 213 228.
61. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco, CA.
62. Spangler, H. G., M. D. Greenfield, and A. Takessian. 1984. Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth. Physiol. Entomol. 9 : 87 95.
63. Sutherland, W. J. 1985. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33 : 1349 1352.
64. Taylor, P. D., and G. C. Williams. 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22 : 392 409.
65. Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza. 2004. Genetic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 323 328.
66. Turelli, M. and N. H. Barton. 2004. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions. Genetics 166 : 1053 1079.
67. Via, S. 1984. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. I. Genotype-environment interaction in larval performance on different host plant species. Evolution 38 : 881 895.
68. Welch, A. M. 2003. Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution 57 : 883 893.
69. Windig, J. J. 1997. The calculation and significance testing of genetic correlations across environments. J. Evol. Biol. 10 : 853 874.
70. Zhang, X.-S. and W. G. Hill. 2005. Genetic variability under mutation selection balance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 : 468 470.