Haemodiafiltration: Promise for the future?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 438-443

  Van Der Weerd, Neelke C ^a,b   Penne, E Lars ^a,b   Van Den Dorpel, Marinus A ^c   Grooteman, Muriel P C ^b   Nube, Menso J ^b,d   Bots, Michiel L ^a   Ter Wee, Piet M ^b   Blankestijn, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Medisch Centrum Rijnmond Zuid   (Netherlands)

^d Location Alkmaar   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Haemodialysis; On line haemodiafiltration

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENT FACTOR D; ERYTHROPOIETIN; INTERLEUKIN 6; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

AMYLOIDOSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; DIALYSIS; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HUMAN; NOTE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SURVIVAL TIME; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FORECASTING; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 44449153757     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm791     Document Type: Note

References (44)

1. Leypoldt JK. Solute fluxes in different treatment modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(Suppl 1): 3-9
2. Cheung AK, Rocco MV, Yan G et al. Serum beta-2 microglobulin levels predict mortality in dialysis patients: results of the HEMO study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 546-555
3. Vanholder R, De SR, Glorieux G et al. Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int 2003; 63: 1934-1943
4. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 2010-2019
5. Cheung AK, Levin NW, Greene T et al. Effects of high-flux hemodialysis on clinical outcomes: results of the HEMO study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 3251-3263
6. Delmez JA, Yan G, Bailey J et al. Cerebrovascular disease in maintenance hemodialysis patients: results of the HEMO Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 47: 131-138
7. Locatelli F, Hannedouche T, Jacobson S et al. The effect of membrane permeability on ESRD: design of a prospective randomised multicentre trial. J Nephrol 1999; 12: 85-88
8. Krane V, Krieter DH, Olschewski M et al. Dialyzer membrane characteristics and outcome of patients with type 2 diabetes on maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49: 267-275
9. Canaud B, Bragg-Gresham JL, Marshall MR et al. Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 2006; 69: 2087-2093
10. Ledebo I. Principles and practice of hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration. Artif Organs 1998; 22: 20-25
11. Ledebo I. On-line preparation of solutions for dialysis: practical aspects versus safety and regulations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13(Suppl 1): S78-S83
12. Ledebo I. Convective dialysis therapies, current status and perspective. Ther Apher Dial 2005; 9: 223-227
13. Maduell F, Navarro V, Cruz MC et al. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 582-589
14. Ward RA, Schmidt B, Hullin J, Hillebrand GF et al. A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 2344-2350
15. Lin CL, Yang CW, Chiang CC et al. Long-term on-line hemodiafiltration reduces predialysis beta-2-microglobulin levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2001; 19: 301-307
16. Lornoy W, Becaus I, Billiouw JM et al. On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(Suppl 1): 49-54
17. Wizemann V, Lotz C, Techert F et al. On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(Suppl 1): 43-48
18. Minutolo R, Bellizzi V, Cioffi M et al. Postdialytic rebound of serum phosphorus: pathogenetic and clinical insights. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1046-1054
19. Zehnder C, Gutzwiller JP, Renggli K. Hemodiafiltration - a new treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 1999; 52: 152-159
20. Beerenhout CH, Luik AJ, Jeuken-Mertens SG et al. Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 1155-1163
21. Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL, Teehan GS et al. Daily hemofiltration for end-stage renal disease: a feasibility and efficacy trial. Blood Purif 2004; 22: 481-489
22. Raj DS, Ouwendyk M, Francoeur R et al. Beta(2)-microglobulin kinetics in nocturnal haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 58-64
23. Altieri P, Sorba GB, Bolasco PG et al. On-line predilution hemofiltration versus ultrapure high-flux hemodialysis: a multicenter prospective study in 23 patients. Sardinian Collaborative Study Group of On-Line Hemofiltration. Blood Purif 1997; 15: 169-181
24. Maduell F, Navarro V, Torregrosa E et al. Change from three times a week on-line hemodiafiltration to short daily on-line hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 305-313
25. Bonforte G, Grillo P, Zerbi S et al. Improvement of anemia in hemodialysis patients treated by hemodiafiltration with high-volume on-line-prepared substitution fluid. Blood Purif 2002; 20: 357-363
26. Lin CL, Huang CC, Yu CC et al. Improved iron utilization and reduced erythropoietin resistance by on-line hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif 2002; 20: 349-356
27. Maduell F, del PC, Garcia H et al. Change from conventional haemodiafiltration to on-line haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 1202-1207
28. Vaslaki L, Major L, Berta K et al. On-line haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis: stable haematocrit with less erythropoietin and improvement of other relevant blood parameters. Blood Purif 2006; 24: 163-173
29. Donauer J, Schweiger C, Rumberger B et al. Reduction of hypotensive side effects during online-haemodiafiltration and lowtemperature haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 1616-1622
30. Mion M, Kerr PG, Argiles A et al. Haemodiafiltration in high-cardiovascular-risk patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1992; 7: 453-454
31. Movilli E, Camerini C, Zein H et al. A prospective comparison of bicarbonate dialysis, hemodiafiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 27: 541-547
32. Jirka T, Cesare S, Di BA et al. Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 1524-1525
33. Bosch JP, Lew SQ, Barlee V et al. Clinical use of high-efficiency hemodialysis treatments: long-term assessment. Hemodial Int 2006; 10: 73-81
34. Rabindranath KS, Strippoli GF, Roderick P et al. Comparison of hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration for ESRD: systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 45: 437-447
35. Locatelli F. Comparison of hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, and hemofiltration: systematic review or systematic error? Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 787-788
36. Wizemann V. Si tacuisses. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 787-789
37. Penne EL, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML et al. Effect of increased convective clearance by on-line hemodiafiltration on all cause and cardiovascular mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients - the Dutch CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST): rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN38365125]. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2005; 6: 8
38. Penne EL, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML et al. Resolving controversies regarding hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: the Dutch Convective Transport Study. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 47-51
39. Canaud B, Morena M, Leray-Moragues H et al. Overview of clinical studies in hemodiafiltration: what do we need now? Hemodial Int 2006; 10(Suppl 1): S5-S12
40. Bolasco P, Altieri P, Andrulli S et al. Convection versus diffusion in dialysis: an Italian prospective multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18(Suppl 7): vii50-vii54
41. Schiffl H. Prospective randomized cross-over long-term comparison of online haemodiafiltration and ultrapure high-flux haemodialysis. Eur J Med Res 2007; 12: 26-33
42. Locatelli F, Mastrangelo F, Redaelli B et al. The Italian Cooperative Dialysis Study Group. Effects of different membranes and dialysis technologies on patient treatment tolerance and nutritional parameters. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 1293-1302
43. Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Conte F et al. The Registro Lombardo Dialisi E Trapianto. Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatments. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 286-293
44. Nakai S, Iseki K, Tabei K et al. Outcomes of hemodiafiltration based on Japanese dialysis patient registry. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: S212-S216