Twenty statistical errors even YOU can find in biomedical research articles

Croatian Medical Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 361-370

  Lang, Tom ^a,b  

^a Tom Lang Communications and Training   (United States)

^b Tom Lang Communications   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EDITORIAL; HYPOTHESIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 4444341342     PISSN: 03539504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (42)

1. Glantz SA. Biostatistics: how to detect, correct and prevent errors in the medical literature. Circulation. 1980; 61:1-7.
2. Evans M. Presentation of manuscripts for publication in the British Journal of Surgery. Br J Surg. 1989;76:1311-4.
3. Mainland D. Chance and the blood count. 1934. CMAJ. 1993;148:225-7.
4. Schor S, Karten I. Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscripts. JAMA. 1966;195:1123-8.
5. White SJ. Statistical errors in papers in the British Journal of Psychiatry. Brit J Psychiatry. 1979;135:336-42.
6. Hemminki E. Quality of reports of clinical trials submitted by the drug industry to the Finnish and Swedish control authorities. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;19:157-65.
7. Gore SM, Jones G, Thompson SG. The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors. Lancet. 1992;340:100-2.
8. George SL. Statistics in medical journals: a survey of current policies and proposals for editors. Med Pediatric Oncol. 1985;13:109-12.
9. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657-62; Lancet. 2001; 357: 1191-4; JAMA. 2001;285:1987-91.
10. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657-62; Lancet. 2001; 357: 1191-4; JAMA. 2001;285:1987-91.
11. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657-62; Lancet. 2001; 357: 1191-4; JAMA. 2001;285:1987-91.
12. Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-12.
13. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF, for the Quorum group. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUORUM statement. Lancet. 1999;354: 1896-900.
14. Lang T, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. Philadelphia (PA): American College of Physicians; 1997.
15. Ehrenberg AS. The problem of numeracy. Am Statistician. 1981;286:67-71.
16. Murray GD. The task of a statistical referee. Br J Surg. 1988;75:664-7.
17. Feinstein AR. X and iprP: an improved summary for scientific communication. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:283-8.
18. Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics XXXVII. Demeaned errors, confidence games, nonplussed minuses, inefficient coefficients, and other statistical disruptions of scientific communication. Clin Pharm Therapeutics. 1976;20;617-31.
19. Gardner MJ, Altman D. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ. 1986;292:746-50.
20. Bailar JC, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:266-73.
21. DerSimonian R, Charette LJ, McPeek B, Mosteller F. Reporting on methods in clinical trails. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1332-7.
22. Cooper GS, Zangwill L. An analysis of the quality of research reports in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:232-6.
23. Hampton JR. Presentation and analysis of the results of clinical trials in cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 1981;282: 1371-3.
24. Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:426-32.
25. Altman DG, Dore CJ. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet. 1990;335:149-53.
26. How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;124:703-10.
27. Simel DL, Feussner JR, Delong ER, Matchar DB. Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results. Med Decis Making. 1987;7:107-14.
28. Harris RL. Information graphics: a comprehensive illustrated reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
29. Lang T, Talerico C. Improving comprehension: theories and research findings. In: American Medical Writers Association. Selected workshops in biomedical communication, Vol. 2. Bethesda (MD): American Medical Writers Association; 1997.
30. Gotzsche PC. Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Cont Clin Trials. 1989;10:31-56.
31. Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attiudes in therapeutic trials. J Chron Dis. 1967;20: 637-48.
32. Simon G, Wagner E, Vonkroff M. Cost-effectiveness comparisons using "real world" randomized trials: the case of new antidepressant drugs. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:363-73.
33. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guide to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 1994; 271:59-63.
34. Brett AS. Treating hypercholesterolemia: how should practicing physicians interpret the published data for patients? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:676-80.
35. Ellenbaas RM, Ellenbaas JK, Cuddy PG. Evaluating the medical literature, part II: statistical analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:610-20.
36. Altman DG, Gore SM, Gardner MJ, Pocock SJ. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. BMJ. 1983;286:1489-93.
37. Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Cont Clin Trials. 1981;2:31-49.
38. Gardner MJ, Machin D, Campbell MJ. Use of checklists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. BMJ. 1986;292:810-2.
39. Mosteller F, Gilbert JP, McPeek B. Reporting Standards and Research Strategies for Controlled Trials. Control Clin Trials. 1980;1:37-58.
40. Murray GD. Statistical guidelines for the British Journal of Surgery. Br J Surg. 1991;78:782-4.
41. Simon R, Wittes RE. Methodologic guidelines for reports of clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1-3.
42. Zelen M. Guidelines for publishing papers on cancer clinical trials: responsibilities of editors and authors. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1:164-9.