St. Jude medical Toronto biologic aortic root prosthesis: Early FDA phase II IDE study results

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 786-793

  Gleason, Thomas G ^a,e   David, Tirone E ^b   Coselli, Joseph S ^c   Hammon Jr , John W ^d   Bavaria, Joseph E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

35

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANIMALS; AORTIC ANEURYSM; AORTIC STENOSIS, SUBVALVULAR; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; BIOPROSTHESIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE; SWINE;

EID: 4444303109     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.077     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akins C.W., Carroll D.L., Buckley M.J., Daggett W.M., Hilgenberg A.D., Austen W.G. Late results with Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. Circulation. 82:1990;IV65-74
2. Jamieson W.R., Janusz M.T., Miyagishima R.T., et al. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. Long-term evaluation of the high pressure glutaraldehyde fixed prosthesis. J Card Surg. 3:1988;321-336
3. Myken P.S., Caidahl K., Larsson S., Berggren H.E. 10-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis. 3:1994;648-656
4. Chen W., Schoen F.J., Levy R.J. Mechanism of efficacy of 2-amino oleic acid for inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde-pretreated porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 90:1994;323-329
5. Kon N.D., Riley R.D., Adair S.M., Kitzman D.W., Cordell A.R. Eight-year results of aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 73:2002;1817-1821. discussion 1821
6. Levy R.J., Vyavahare N., Ogle M., Ashworth P., Bianco R., Schoen F.J. Inhibition of cusp and aortic wall calcification in ethanol- and aluminum-treated bioprosthetic heart valves in sheep background, mechanisms, and synergism. J Heart Valve Dis. 12:2003;209-216. discussion 216
7. Melina G., Mitchell A., Amrani M., Khaghani A., Yacoub M.H. Transvalvular velocities after full aortic root replacement results from a prospective randomized trial between the homograft and the Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 11:2002;54-58. discussion 58-9
8. Dagum P., Green G.R., Nistal F.J., et al. Deformational dynamics of the aortic root modes and physiologic determinants. Circulation. 100:1999;II54-62
9. Bech-Hanssen O., Wallentin I., Larsson S., Caidahl K. Reference Doppler echocardiographic values for St. Jude Medical, Omnicarbon, and Biocor prosthetic valves in the aortic position. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 11:1998;466-477
10. Silberman S., Shaheen J., Merin O., et al. Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 72:2001;1217-1221
11. Martins S., Neves F., Soares R.M., et al. Comparative study of Toronto SPV prosthesis, and bileaflet mechanical aortic prosthesis with 2D-Doppler echocardiography. Rev Port Cardiol. 18:1999;1111-1116
12. Silberman S., Shaheen J., Fink D., et al. Comparison of exercise hemodynamics among nonstented aortic bioprostheses, mechanical valves, and normal native aortic valves. J Card Surg. 13:1998;412-416
13. Thomson H.L., O'Brien M.F., Almeida A.A., Tesar P.J., Davison M.B., Burstow D.J. Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 13:1998;572-575
14. Morsy S., Zahran M., Usama M., Elkhashab K., Abdel-Aziz I. Hemodynamic performance of stentless porcine bioprosthesis and mechanical bileaflet prosthesis using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 13:2001;129-135
15. Kirklin J.K., Smith D., Novick W., et al. Long-term function of cryopreserved aortic homografts. A ten-year study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 106:1993;154-165. discussion 165-6
16. O'Brien M.F., Stafford E.G., Gardner M.A., et al. Allograft aortic valve replacement long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 60:1995;S65-70
17. Doty J.R., Salazar J.D., Liddicoat J.R., Flores J.H., Doty D.B. Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allograft ten-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 115:1998;371-379. discussion 379-80
18. O'Brien M.F., Harrocks S., Stafford G., Gardner M., Sparks L., Barnett A. Allograft aortic root replacement in 418 patients over a span of 15 years 1985 to 2000. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 13:2001;180-185
19. Takkenberg J.J., Eijkemans M.J., van Herwerden L.A., et al. Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults. Ann Thorac Surg. 75:2003;1482-1489
20. Elkins R.C., Lane M.M., McCue C., Ward K.E. Pulmonary autograft root replacement mid-term results. J Heart Valve Dis. 8:1999;499-503. discussion 503-6
21. Stelzer P., Weinrauch S., Tranbaugh R.F. Ten years of experience with the modified Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 115:1998;1091-1100
22. Luciani G.B., Casali G., Favaro A., et al. Fate of the aortic root late after Ross operation. Circulation. 108:(Suppl 1):2003;II61-67
23. Fedak P.W., Verma S., Butany J., Weisel R.D., David T.E. Aortic valve malformations and pulmonary autograft root dilatation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 123:2002;1222-1223. author reply 1223-4
24. de Sa M., Moshkovitz Y., Butany J., David T.E. Histologic abnormalities of the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease clinical relevance to the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 118:1999;588-594
25. Takkenberg J.J., Zondervan P.E., van Herwerden L.A. Progressive pulmonary autograft root dilatation and failure after Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 67:1999;551-553. discussion 553-4
26. Kon N.D., Cordell A.R., Adair S.M., Dobbins J.E., Kitzman D.W. Aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 67:1999;1609-1615. discussion 1615-6
27. Vyavahare N., Hirsch D., Lerner E., et al. Prevention of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by ethanol preincubation. Efficacy and mechanisms. Circulation. 95:1997;479-488
28. Vyavahare N., Ogle M., Schoen F.J., Levy R.J. Elastin calcification and its prevention with aluminum chloride pretreatment. Am J Pathol. 155:1999;973-982
29. Walther T., Falk V., Autschbach R., et al. Comparison of different anticalcification treatments for stentless bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 66:1998;S249-254
30. Gelsomino S., Morocutti G., Frassani R., et al. Long-term results of Bentall composite aortic root replacement for ascending aortic aneurysms and dissections. Chest. 124:2003;984-988
31. Fullerton D.A., Fredericksen J.W., Sundaresan R.S., Horvath K.A. The Ross procedure in adults intermediate-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 76:2003;471-476. discussion 476-7
32. Kallenbach K., Hagl C., Walles T., et al. Results of valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction in 158 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 74:2002;2026-2032. discussion 2032-3
33. Pacini D., Ranocchi F., Angeli E., et al. Aortic root replacement with composite valve graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 76:2003;90-98
34. Gelsomino S., Masullo G., Morocutti G., et al. Sixteen-year results of composite aortic root replacement for non-dissecting chronic aortic aneurysms. Ital Heart J. 4:2003;454-459
35. Byrne J.G., Gudbjartsson T., Karavas A.N., et al. Biological vs. mechanical aortic root replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 23:2003;305-310
36. Del Rizzo D.F., Freed D., Abdoh A., et al. Midterm survival of stented versus stentless valves does concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting impact survival? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 13:2001;148-155
37. Westaby S., Horton M., Jin X.Y., et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 70:2000;785-790. ; discussion 790-1
38. David T.E. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses. J Card Surg. 13:1998;344-351
39. David T.E., Puschmann R., Ivanov J., et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves a case-match study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 116:1998;236-241
40. Del Rizzo D.F., Abdoh A., Cartier P., Doty D., Westaby S. The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 11:1999;1-8
41. Riley R.D., Hammon J.W. Jr, Adair S.M., Cordell A.R., Kon N.D. Stentless aortic valve replacement with Freestyle or Toronto SPV an early comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 70:2000;48-51. discussion 51-2
42. David T.E., Ivanov J., Eriksson M.J., Bos J., Feindel C.M., Rakowski H. Dilation of the sinotubular junction causes aortic insufficiency after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122:2001;929-934
43. Bach D.S., Cartier P.C., Kon N.D., Johnson K.G., Deeb G.M., Doty D.B. Impact of implant technique following freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 74:2002;1107-1113. discussion 1113-4