Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: Comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 1217-1221

  Silberman, Shuli ^a   Shaheen, Joseph ^b   Merin, Ofer ^b   Fink, Dani ^b   Shapira, Nadiv ^b   Liviatan Strauss, Nurit ^b   Bitran, Dani ^b  

^a SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOBUTAMINE;

AORTA PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0034774317     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03064-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis
2. Stentless aortic bioprostheses: Compelling data from the second international symposium
3. Perioperative assessment of aortic homograft, Toronto stentless valve, and stented valve in the aortic position
4. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: A case match study
5. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses
6. Effect of stent mounting on tissue valves for aortic replacement
7. Fatigue induced damage in glutaraldehyde preserved heart valve tissues
8. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement
9. Risk of ventricular arrhythmias in left ventricular hypertrophy: The Framingham Heart Study
10. Expression of cellular oncogenes in the myocardium during the developmental stage and pressure overloaded hypertrophy of the rat heart
11. Cell calcium, oncogenes, and hypertrophy
12. Up to thirty year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root
13. Valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with poor left ventricular function. Comparison of early changes with stented and stentless valves
14. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve
15. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: A proposed standard for valve size nomenclature
16. Comparison of hemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and Carbomedics 21 mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography
17. Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small size aortic valve prostheses
18. Comparison of exercise hemodynamics among nonstented aortic bioprostheses, mechanical valves, and normal native aortic valves
19. Comparative analysis of left ventricular hemodynamics and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with homografts or mechanical valves
20. Comparative rest and exercise hemodyamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses
21. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves. Impact on regression of left ventricular hypertrophy
22. Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: A comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement
23. The use of unstented homograft valves for aortic valve reoperations. Review of a twenty three year experience
24. The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery
25. Left ventricular remodelling after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto-SPV prosthesis