Biological vs. mechanical aortic root replacement

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 305-310

  Byrne, John G ^a   Gudbjartsson, Tomas ^a   Karavas, Alexandros N ^a   Mihaljevic, Tomislav ^a   Phillips, Bradley J ^a   Aranki, Sary F ^a   Rawn, James D ^a   Cohn, Lawrence H ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic root replacement; Valve choice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AORTA DISEASE; AORTA GRAFT; AORTA PROSTHESIS; AORTA ROOT REPLACEMENT; AORTA SURGERY; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; BLEEDING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE GRAFT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEATH; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HEART DISEASE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RHEUMATIC HEART DISEASE; SAFETY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

ADULT; AORTIC DISEASES; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037335204     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00816-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Peterseim D.S., Cen Y.Y., Cheruvu S., Landolfo K., Bashore T.M., Lowe J.E., Wolfe W.G., Glower D.D. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 117:1999;890-897.
2. Birkmeyer N.J., Birkmeyer J.D., Tosteson A.N., Grunkemeier G.L., Marrin C.A., O'Connor G.T. Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 70:2000;1946-1952.
3. Edmunds L.H. Jr., Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., Grunkemeier G.L., Miller D.C., Weisel R.D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 62:1996;932-935.
4. STS National Database: operative mortality by preoperative status and first vs. reoperation. US data 1997: aortic valve replacement. 1998;The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
5. Crawford E.S., Svensson L.G., Coselli J.S., Safi H.J., Hess K.R. Surgical treatment of aneurysm and/or dissection of the ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch. Factors influencing survival in 717 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 98:1989;659-674.
6. Raudkivi P.J., Williams J.D., Monro J.L., Ross J.K. Surgical treatment of the ascending aorta. Fourteen years' experience with 83 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 98:1989;675-682.
7. Lytle B.W., Mahfood S.S., Cosgrove D.M., Loop F.D. Replacement of the ascending aorta. Early and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 99:1990;651-658.
8. Kouchoukos N.T., Wareing T.H., Murphy S.F., Perrillo J.B. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Results of 172 operations. Ann Surg. 214:1991;308-320.
9. Svensson L.G., Crawford E.S., Hess K.R., Coselli J.S., Safi H.J. Composite valve graft replacement of the proximal aorta: comparison of techniques in 348 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 54:1992;427-439.
10. Cohn L.H., Rizzo R.J., Adams D.H., Aranki S.F., Couper G.S., Beckel N., Collins J.J. Jr. Reduced mortality and morbidity for ascending aortic aneurysm resection regardless of cause. Ann Thorac Surg. 62:1996;463-468.
11. Mingke D., Dresler C., Stone C.D., Borst H.G. Composite graft replacement of the aortic root in 335 patients with aneurysm or dissection. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 46:1998;12-19.
12. Lewis C.T., Cooley D.A., Murphy M.C., Talledo O., Vega D. Surgical repair of aortic root aneurysms in 280 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 53:1992;38-46.
13. Westaby S., Katsumata T., Vaccari G. Aortic root replacement with coronary button re-implantation: low risk and predictable outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 17:2000;259-265.
14. Myken P.S., Caidahl K., Larsson P., Larsson S., Wallentin I., Berggren H.E. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis: a ten-year comparison regarding function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg. 60:1995;S447-S452.
15. Munro A.I., Jamieson W.R., Burr L.H., Ling H., Miyagishima R.T., Germann E. Comparison of porcine bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in multiple valve replacement operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 60:1995;S459-S463.
16. Hammermeister K.E., Sethi G.K., Henderson W.G., Oprian C., Kim T., Rahimtoola S. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. N Engl J Med. 328:1993;1289-1296.
17. O'Brien M.F., Stafford E.G., Gardner M.A., Pohlner P.G., Tesar P.J., Cochrane A.D., Mau T.K., Gall K.L., Smith S.E. Allograft aortic valve replacement: long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 60:1995;S65-S70.
18. Byrne J.G., Karavas A.N., Aklog L., Adams D.H., Cheung A.C., Cohn L.H., Aranki S.F. Aortic valve reoperation after homograft or autograft replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 10:2001;451-457.