Mapping as you go: An effective approach for marker-assisted selection of complex traits

Crop Science

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1560-1571

  Podlich, Dean W ^a   Winkler, Christopher R ^a   Cooper, Mark ^a  

^a PIONEER HI BRED INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444268862     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.1560     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Beavis, W.D. 1998. QTL analysis: Power, precision and accuracy. p. 145-161. In A.H. Paterson (ed.) Molecular analysis of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
2. Bernardo, R. 2001. What if we knew all the genes for a quantitative trait in hybrid crops? Crop Sci. 41:1-4.
3. Bink, M.C.A.M., P. Uimari, M.J. Sillanpää, L.L.G. Janss, and R.C. Jansen. 2002. Multiple QTL mapping in related plant populations via a pedigree-analysis approach. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1243-1253.
4. Boer, M.P., C.J.F. ter Braak, and R.C. Jansen. 2002. A penalized likelihood method for mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. Genetics 162:951-960.
5. Cheverud, J.M., and E.J. Routman. 1995. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139:1455-1461.
6. Clark, A.G. 2000. Limits to prediction of phenotypes from knowledge of genotypes. Evol. Biol. 32:205-224.
7. Comstock, R.E. 1977. Quantitative genetics and the design of breeding programs. p. 705-718. In E. Pollack et al. (ed.) Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Quantitative Genetics, Ames, IA. 16-21 Aug. 1976. The Iowa State University Press, Ames.
8. Cooper, M., S.C. Chapman, D.W. Podlich, and G.L. Hammer. 2002. The GP problem: Quantifying gene-to-phenotype relationships. Silico Biol. 2:151-164.
9. Cooper, M., and G.L. Hammer. (ed.) 1996. Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
10. Cooper, M., and D.W. Podlich. 2002. The E(NK) model: Extending the NK model to incorporate gene-by-environment interactions and epistasis for diploid genomes. Complexity 7(6):31-47.
11. Crossa, J., M. Vargas, F.A. van Eeuwijk, C. Jiang, G.O. Edmeades, and D. Hoisington. 1999. Interpreting genotype X environment interaction in tropical maize using linked molecular markers and environmental covariables. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:611-625.
12. de Visser, J.A.G.M., J. Hermisson, G.P. Wagner, L. Ancel Meyers, J. Bagheri-Chaichian, J.L. Blanchard, L. Chao, J.M. Cheverud, S.F. Elena, W. Fontana, G. Gibson, T.F. Hansen, D. Krakauer, R.C. Lewontin, C. Ofria, S.H. Rice, G. von Dassow, A. Wagner, and M.C. Whitlock. 2003. Perspective: Evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57:1959-1972.
13. Flint-Garcia, S.A., L.L. Darrah. M.D. McMullen, and B.E. Hibbard. 2003. Phenotypic versus marker-assisted selection for stalk strength and second-generation European corn borer resistance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:1331-1336.
14. Holland, J.B. 2001. Epistasis and plant breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 21:27-92.
15. Jannink, J.-L., M.C.A.M. Bink, and R.C. Jansen. 2001. Using complex plant pedigrees to map valuable genes. Trends Plant Sci. 6(8):337-342.
16. Jannink, J.-L., and R.C. Jansen. 2001. Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. Genetics 157:445-454.
17. Jansen, R.C. 1994. Controlling the Type I and Type II errors in mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 138:871-881.
18. Jansen, R.C. 1996. Complex plant traits: Time for polygenic analysis. Trends Plant Sci. 1:89-94.
19. Jansen, R.C., J.-L. Jannink, and W.D. Beavis. 2003. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plant breeding populations: Use of parental haplotype sharing. Crop Sci. 43:829-834.
20. Koornneef, M., and P. Stam. 2001. Changing paradigms in plant breeding. Plant Physiol. 125:156-159.
21. Kuhnlein, U., R. Parsanejad, D. Zadworndy, and S.E. Aggrey. 2003. The dynamics of the genotype-phenotype association. Poult. Sci. 82:876-881.
22. Lande, R., and R. Thompson. 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743-756.
23. Mackay, T.F.C. 2001. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:11-20.
24. McMullen, M.D., M. Snook, E.A. Lee, P.F. Byrne, H. Kross, T.A. Musket, K. Houchins, and E.H. Coe. 2001. The biological basis of epistasis between quantitative trait loci for flavone and 3-deoxyanthocyanin synthesis in maize (Zea mays L.). Genome 44:667-676.
25. Melchinger, A.E., H.F. Utz, and C.C. Schön. 1998. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149:383-403.
26. Meuwissen, T.H.E., and M.E. Goddard. 2000. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci. Genetics 155:421-430.
27. Nelson, M.R., S.L.R. Kardia, R.E. Ferrell, and C.F. Sing. 2001. A combinatorial partitioning method to identify multilocus genotypic partitions that predict quantitative trait variation. Genome Res. 11:458-470.
28. Openshaw, S., and E. Frascaroli. 1997. QTL detection and marker-assisted selection for complex traits in maize. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 52:44-53.
29. Peccoud, J., K. Vander Velden, D.W. Podlich, C.R. Winkler, W.L. Arthur, and M. Cooper. 2004. The selective values of alleles in a molecular network model are context dependent. Genetics 166:1715-1725.
30. Peleman, J.D., and J. Rouppe van der Voort. 2003. Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci. 8(7):330-334.
31. Podlich, D.W., and M. Cooper. 1998. QU-GENE: A platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models. Bioinformatics 14:632-653.
32. Podlich, D.W., M. Cooper, and K.E. Basford. 1999. Computer simulation of a selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interactions in a wheat recurrent selection program. Plant Breed. 118:17-28.
33. Rasmusson, D.C., and R.L. Phillips. 1997. Plant breeding programs and genetic diversity from de novo variation and elevated epistasis. Crop Sci. 37:303-310.
34. Rathjen, A.J. 1994. The biological basis of genotype environment interaction - Its definition and management. p. 13-17. In J. Paull et al. (ed.) Proc. Seventh Assembly of the Wheat Breeding Society of Australia. Adelaide, Australia.
35. Schlichting, C.D., and M. Pigliucci. 1998. Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
36. Tuberosa, R., S. Salvi, M.C. Sanguineti, P. Landi, M. Maccaferri, and S. Conti. 2002. Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield: Case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Ann. Bot. (London) 89:941-963.
37. Utz, H.F., A.E. Melchinger, and C.C. Schön. 2000. Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genotypic variance explained by quantitative trait loci determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation and validation with independent samples. Genetics 154:1839-1849.
38. van Eeuwijk, F.A., J. Crossa, M. Vargas, and J.-M. Ribaut. 2002. Analysing QTL by environment interaction by factorial regression, with an application to the CIMMYT drought and low nitrogen stress programme in maize. p. 245-256. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
39. Wade, M.J. 2001. Epistasis, complex traits, and mapping genes. Genetica (The Hague) 112-113:59-69.
40. Wade, M.J. 2002. A gene's eye view of epistasis, selection, and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 15:337-346.
41. Wolf, J.B., E.E. Brodie, III, and M.J. Wade, (ed.) 2000. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Yi, N., and S. Xu. 2001. Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci under complicated mating designs. Genetics 157:1759-1771.