Exploring the dynamics of the visual word recognition system: Homophone effects in LDT and naming

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 503-532

  Edwards, Jodi D ^a   Pexman, Penny M ^b   Hudson, Carl E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 4444253415     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000215     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Balota, D.A. (1990). The role of meaning in word recognition. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcaise, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 9-32), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Balota, D.A., & Chumbley, J.I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. Balota, D.A., Paul, S.T., & Spieler, D.H. (1999). Attentional control of lexical processing pathways during word recognition and reading. In S.C. Garrod & M.J. Pickering (Eds.), Language processing (pp. 15-57). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
4. Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., & Burgess, C. (2001). Characterizing semantic space: Neighbourhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 531-544.
5. Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
6. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., & Leahy, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 917-955.
8. Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J.T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 6, 391-402.
9. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (2003). Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 403-419.
10. Gibbs, P., & Van Orden, G.C. (1998). Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1162-1187.
11. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S.J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
12. Hino, Y., Lupker, S.J., & Pexman, P.M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686-713.
13. Kruez, R.J. (1987). The subjective familiarity of English homophones. Memory and Cognition, 15, 154-168.
14. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
15. Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 545-551.
16. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151-174.
17. Pexman, P.M., & Lupker, S.J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323-334.
18. Pexman, P.M., Lupker, S.J., & Hino, Y. (2002a). The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number of features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 542-549.
19. Pexman, P.M., Lupker, S.J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139-156.
20. Pexman, P.M., Lupker, S.J., & Reggin, L.D. (2002b). Phonological effects in visual word recognition: Investigating the impact of feedback activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 572-584.
21. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
22. Rastle, K., & Davis, M.H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S.J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
23. Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S.S., & Rubenstein, M.A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.
24. Starr, M.S., & Fleming, K.K. (2001). A rose by any other name is not the same: The role of orthographic knowledge in homophone confusion errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 744-760.
25. Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
26. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
27. Taft, M. (1984). Evidence for an abstract lexical representation of word structure. Memory and Cognition, 12, 264-269.
28. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.
29. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
30. Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
31. Terrell, C.D., & Meadows, B. (1985). A list of English homophones. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 627-631.
32. Van Orden, G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.
33. Van Orden, G.C., & Goldinger, S.D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
34. Ziegler, J.C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A.M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554.