Abductor reattachment with a custom proximal femoral replacement prosthesis

Orthopedics

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 722-726

  Anderson, Megan E ^a   Hyodo, Akira ^a   Zehr, Robert J ^a   Marks, Kenneth E ^a   Muschler, George F ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR TUMOR; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE TRANSPOSITION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASTUS LATERALIS MUSCLE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEMENTATION; FEMORAL NEOPLASMS; FEMUR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036665347     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Johnson ME, Mankin HJ. Reconstructions after resection of tumors involving the proximal femur. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991; 22:87-103.
2. Capanna R, Guerra A, Ruggieri P, Biagini R, Campanacci M. The Kotz modular prosthesis in massive osteo-articular resections for bone tumors: preliminary results in 27 cases. Ital J Orthop Trauma. 1985; 11:271-281.
3. Giurea A, Paternostro T, Heinz-Peer G, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Function of reinserted abductor muscles after femoral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:284-287.
4. Haentjens P, De Boeck H, Opdecam P. Proximal femoral replacement prosthesis for salvage of failed hip arthroplasty: complications in a 2-11 year follow-up study in 19 elderly patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996; 67:37-42.
5. Malkani AL, Sim FH, Chao EY. Customade segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995; 24:727-733.
6. Sim PH, Chao EY. Hip salvage by proximal femoral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63:1228-1239.
7. Sim FH, Chao EY. Special prosthetic replacement. In: Evarts CM, ed. Surgery of the Muskuloskeletal System. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1990;3141-3183.
8. Sim FH, Chao EY, Peterson LFA. Reconstruction following segmental resection of primary bone tumors of the hip. In: The Hip-Proceedings of the Third Open Scientific Meeting fo the Hip Society. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1975:302-324.
9. Veth RP, Nielsen HK, Oldhoff J, et al. Megaprostheses in the treatment of primary malignant and metastatic tumors in the hip region. J Surg Oncol. 1989; 40:214-218.
10. Zichner LP, Heipertz W. Replacement of the proximal femur in primary and secondary tumors. IN: Chao EY, Ivins JC, eds. Tumor Prosthesis for Bone and Joint Reconstruction - The Design and Application. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Verlag; 1983:195-205.
11. Malkani AL, Settecerri JJ, Sim FH, Chao EY, Wallrichs SL. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77:351-356.
12. Scales JT. Massive bone and Joint replacement involving the upper femur, acetabulum, and iliac bone. In: The Hip - Proceedings of the Third Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1975:245-275.
13. Kotz R. A modular femur and tibia reconstruction system. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Design and Application of Tumor Prostheses for Bone and Joint Reconstruction. Vienna, Austria; 1983.
14. Morris HG, Capanna R, Del Ben M, Campanacci D. Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumors. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:293-299.
15. Morris HG, Capanna R, Campanacci D, Del Ben M, Gasbarrini A. Modular endoprosthetic replacement after total resection of the femur for malignant tumour. Int Orthop. 1994; 18:90-95.
16. Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73:235-240.
17. Gross AE, Hutchison CR, Alexeeff M, Mahomed N, Leitch K, Morsi E. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop. 1995; 319:151-158.
18. Heat WC, Malinin TI, Berklacish F. Freeze-dried proximal femur allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 1987; 215:109-121.
19. Jofe MH, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Resection of defects of the proximal part of the femur using allograft arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70:507-516.
20. Lord CF, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Infection in bone allografts. Incidence, nature, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70:369-376.
21. Harris WC. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment of mold arthroplasty, and end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51:737-755.
22. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: Testing Function. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins: 1993.
23. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77:865-869.
24. Bobyn JD, Wilson GJ, MacGregor DC, Pilliar RM, Weatherly GC. Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982; 16:571-584.
25. Robertson DB, Daniel DM, Biden E. Soft tissue fixation to bone. Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14:398-403.
26. Kang YK, Poon TL, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Sim F, Chao EY. In vitro tendon attachment strength to metallic prosthesis. In: Tau SK, ed Limb Salvage - Current Trends. Singapore: International Symposium on Limb Salvage; 1993:473-475.
27. Schreiber A, Exner GU, von Hochstetter AR. Muscle reattachment: especially the gluteal muscles after femoral resection and replacement by tumor prosthesis. In: Langlai F, Tomeno B, eds. Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1991:395-398.