Magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for peripheral arterial disease

Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 205-229

  Roditi, Giles H ^a   Harold, G ^a  

^a GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANEURYSM; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; BUERGER DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LEG ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEPHROTOXICITY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TIBIAL ARTERY;

EID: 44349157050     PISSN: 09656812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/imaging/59636918     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Napel S, Marks M, Rubin G, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 1992;185:607-10.
2. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 2000;214:363-71.
3. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004;233:817-23.
4. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A, et al. Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol 2004;14:178-83.
5. Ota H, Takase K, Igarashi K, et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:201-9.
6. Edwards AJ, Wells IP, Roobottom CA. Multidetector row CT angiography of the lower limb arteries: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered techniques and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Clin Radiol 2005;60:85-95.
7. Poletti PA, Rosset A, Didier D, et al. Subtraction CT angiogyaphy of the lower limbs: a new technique for the evaluation of acute arterial occlusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1445-8.
8. Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000;36:74-80.
9. Richter CS, Biamino G, Ragg C, Felix R. CT angiography of the pelvic arteries. Eur J Radiol 1994;19:25-31.
10. Ebert DS, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, et al. Evaluating the potential and problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis. J Digit Imaging 1998;11:151-7.
11. Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt W, von Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M. Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:269-76.
12. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Multidetector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience [see comment]. Radiology 2001;221:146-58.
13. Beregi JP, Djabbari M, Desmoucelle F, Willoteaux S, Wattinne L, Louvegny S. Popliteal vascular disease: evaluation with spiral CT angiography [see comment]. Radiology 1997;203:477-83.
14. Soto JA, Munera F, Morales C, et al. Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis. Radiology 2001;218:188-94.
15. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, et al. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004;231:555-63.
16. Romano M. Mainenti PP, Imbriaco M, et al. Multidetector row CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Eur J Radiol 2004;50:303-8.
17. Heuschmid M, Krieger A, Beierlein W, et al. Assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison of multislice-CT angiogiaphy (MS-CTA) and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). Eur J Med Res 2003;8:389-96.
18. Mesurolle B, Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Goeau-Brissonniere OA, Mignon F, Lacombe P. Occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities: comparison of helical CT angiography with transcatheter angiography. Clin Imaging 2004;28:252-60.
19. Chalmers N, Jackson RW. Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in renal impairment. Br J Radiol 1999;72: 701-3.
20. Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson SG, et al. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 2003;348:491-9.
21. Nicholson T, Downes M. Contrast nephrotoxicity and isoosmolar contrast agents: implications of NEPHRIC. Clin Radiol 2003;58:659-60.
22. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Cope C. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography [see comments]. Radiology 1993;187:627-35.
23. Kaufman JA, McCarter D, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography of the lower extremities: artifacts and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:129-35.
24. Steinberg FL, Yucel EK, Dumoulin CL, Souza SP. Peripheral vascular and abdominal applications of MR flow imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:315-20.
25. Sivananthan UM, Ridgway JP, Bann K, et al. Fast magnetic resonance angiography using turbo-FLASH sequences in advanced aortoiliac disease. Br J Radiol 1993;66:1103-10.
26. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
27. Hiraishi K, Narabayashi I, Fujita O, et al. Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:119-23.
28. Ruehm SG, Nanz D, Baumann A, Schmid M, Debatin JF. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vessels: value of image subtraction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13: 402-11.
29. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmentel central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002;225:583-8.
30. Morasch MD, Collins J, Pereles FS, et al. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multi-level contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:62-71.
31. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001;36:170-7.
32. Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Waltering KU, Reiter KB, Kniemeyer HW, Barkhausen J. Optimization of contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography with mid-femoral venous compression (VENCO). Rofo 2004;176:157-62.
33. Zhang HL, Ho BY, Chao M, et al. Decreased venous contamination on 3D gadolinium-enhanced bolus chase peripheral MR angiography using thigh compression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1041-7.
34. Bilecen D, Aschwanden M, Heidecker HG, Bongartz G. Optimized assessment of hand vascularization on contrast-enhanced MR angiography with a subsystolic continuous compression technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182: 180-2.
35. Leiner T. Nijenhuis RJ. Maki JH, Lemaire E, Hoogeveen R, van Engelshoven JM. Use of a three-station phased array coil to improve peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20: 417-25.
36. Bezooijen R, van den Bosch HC, Tielbeek AV, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivity-encoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. Radiology 2004;231:263-71.
37. Wallis F, Roditi GH, Redpath TW, Weir J, Cross KS, Smith FW. Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: diagnosis with gadolinium enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Clin Radiol 2000;55:136-9.
38. Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:162-6.
39. Zhang H, Prince MR. Safety of gadolinium contrast for high-dose MRA. In: 16th Annual International Workshop on Magnetic Resonance Angiography; 2004 October 6-8; London, Ontario, Canada. MR Angio Club, 2004.
40. Atilla S, Akpek ET, Yucel C, Tali ET, Isik S. MR imaging and MR angiography in popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1025-9.
41. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;285:1338-45.
42. Visser K, Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US - a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000:216:67-77.
43. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Schurink GW, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss. Invest Radiol 2004;39:435-44.
44. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MN, et al. Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:13-22.
45. McCarty M, Gedroyc WM. Surgical clip artefact mimicking arterial stenosis: a problem with magnetic resonance angiography. Clin Radiol 1993;48:232-5.
46. Trost DW, Zhang HL, Prince MR, et al. Three-dimensional MR angiography in imaging platinum alloy stents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:975-80.
47. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003;226:798-811.