Use of a three-station phased array coil to improve peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 417-425

  Leiner, Tim ^a   Nijenhuis, Robbert J ^a   Maki, Jeffrey H ^b   Lemaire, Etienne ^a   Hoogeveen, Romhild ^c   Van Engelshoven, Jos M A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VA Puget Sound   (United States)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arteries, extremities; Magnetic resonance (MR), surface coils; Magnetic resonance (MR), technology; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies; Magnetic resonance, contrast enhanced

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST NOISE RATIO; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC VEIN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; LEG; LEG BLOOD FLOW; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THIGH;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 4344651301     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20129     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion- tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692.
2. Ho VB, Choyke PL, Foo TK, et al. Automated bolus chase peripheral MR angiography: initial practical experiences and future directions of this work-in-progress. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:376-388.
3. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
4. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1127-1135.
5. Wang Y, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, et al. Bolus-chase MR digital subtraction angiography in the lower extremity. Radiology 1998;207:263-269.
6. Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBI-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:368-377.
7. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Hoogeveen RM. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:484-491.
8. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, Woodson J, Yucel EK. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv RadioI 2001;12:45-53.
9. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001;36:170-177.
10. Winchester PA, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity with x-ray angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:891-899.
11. Dardik H, Ibrahim IM, Sussman B, et al. Morphologic structure of the pedal arch and its relationship to patency of crural vascular reconstruction. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:645-648.
12. Dalman RL, Taylor Jr LM. Basic data related to infrainguinal revascularization procedures. Ann Vasc Surg 1990;4:309-312.
13. Schweiger H, Klein P, Lang W. Tibial bypass grafting for limb salvage with ringed polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses: results of primary and secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:867-874.
14. Wang Y, Chen CZ, Chabra SG, et al. Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:458-463.
15. Fellner FA, Requardt M, Lang W, Fellner C, Bautz W, Cavallaro A. Peripheral vessels: MR angiography with dedicated phased-array coil with large-field-of-view adapter feasibility study. Radiology 2003;228:284-289.
16. Morasch MD, Collins J, Pereles FS, et al. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:62-71.
17. Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffier K, Bongartz GM, Steinbrich W. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. Invest Radiol 1998;33:538-546.
18. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1066-1072.
19. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MN, et al. Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:13-22.
20. Herborn CU, Ajaj W, Goyen M, Massing S, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. Peripheral vasculature: whole-body MR angiography with mid-femoral venous compression-initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:872-878.
21. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000;217:105-114.
22. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;285:1338-1345.