Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of two types of post cores

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 105-107

  Saygili, Gülbin ^a   Şahmali, Sevil ^a   Demirel, Figen ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; GLASS IONOMER; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VITREMER; WATER;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CEMENTATION; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED EQUIPMENT; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC; WATER;

EID: 44349097503     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gonzales AM, Borrá VA, Font AF, Otaolaurruchi ES, Rueda CL. Response of three types of cast posts and cores to static loading. Quintessence Int 2001;32:552-560.
2. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All ceramic posts and cores: The state of the art. Quintessence Int 1999;30:383-392.
3. Rosentritt M, Fürer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:595-601.
4. Freedman GA. Esthetic post and core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-125.
5. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. Oper Dent 2000;25:223-227.
6. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:624-628.
7. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:423-428.
8. Duncan JP, Pameijer CH. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents. An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:423-428.
9. Combe EC, Shaglouf AM, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent Mater 1999; 15:158-165.
10. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
11. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int J Prosthodont 2001 ; 14:355-363.
12. Al-Ali K, Talic Y, Abduljabbar T, Omar R. Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of cemented cast posts and cores. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:290-294.
13. Krell KJ, Jordan RD, Madison S, Aquilino S. Using ultrasonic scalers to remove fractured root posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:46-49.
14. Johnson WT, Leary JM, Boyer DB. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth. J Endod 1996;22:487-488.
15. Yoshida T, Gomy S, Itoh T, Shibata T, Sekine I. An experimental study of the removal of cemented double-retained cast cores by ultrasonic retainers. J Endod 1997;23:239-241.
16. Peyton FA, Henry EE. The effect of high-speed burs, diamond instrumentations and air abrasive in cutting tooth tissue. J Am Dent Assoc 1954;49:426-435.
17. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301.
18. th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1991;479-503.
19. Santos GC, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH, Santos MJMC. Hardening of dual-cure resin cements and a resin composite restorative cured with QTH and LED curing units. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:323-328.
20. Lund PS, Wilcox LR. The effect of tooth preparation on retention and microleakage of cemented cast posts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:2-9.
21. Noguchi S, Nakamura Y, Mukai S, Hanamura N. The removal of cemented dowels by ultrasonic vibration, Part I. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1988;32:755-762.
22. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. / Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-405.
23. Jacobi R, Shillinburg HT. Pins, dowels, and other retentive devices in posterior teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:367-390.
24. Mentink AGB, Meeuwissen R, Käyser AF, Mulder J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of all-metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:455-461.
25. Tobjörner A, Karlsson S, Ödman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.