IDT-TAM Integrated Model for IT Adoption

Tsinghua Science and Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 306-311

  Zhang, Nan ^a   Guo, Xunhua ^a   Chen, Guoqing ^a  

^a Tsinghua University   (China)

Author keywords

information technology adoption; innovation diffusion theory (IDT); structural equation model (SEM); technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INNOVATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

INNOVATION DIFFUSION THEORY (IDT); STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (SEM); TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 44249128376     PISSN: 10070214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70049-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40 3 (2003) 191-204
2. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319-340
3. Venkatesh V., and Ramesh V. Web and wireless site usability: Understanding differences and modeling use. MIS Quarterly 30 1 (2006) 181-205
4. Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G., and Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
5. Davis F., Bagozzi R., and Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
6. Moore G., and Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 3 (1991) 192-222
7. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th Ed. (1995), The Free Press, New York
8. Zhang Nan, Guo Xunhua, Chen Guoqing. Overviews on IT adoption studies for modeling behavior: Three periods and future orientations. In: Proceedings of CNAIS 2006 Symposium. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Press, 2006: 3-6. (in Chinese).
9. Li T., Zhang P., and Wang K. How do social norms influence the technology acceptance behavior: Mechanism research and empirical validation. Studies in Science of Science 23 3 (2005) 319-324 (in Chinese).
10. Lu Y., and Zhou T. An empirical analysis of factors influencing consumers initial trust under B2C environment. Nankai Business Review 8 6 (2005) 96-101 (in Chinese).
11. Adams D., Nelson R., and Todd P. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-247
12. Straub D., Keil M., and Brenner W. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management 33 1 (1997) 1-11
13. Deng X., Doll W., Hendricksonc A., and Scazzerod J. A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: An illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42 5 (2005) 745-759
14. Taylor S., and Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 144-176
15. Venkatesh V., and Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
16. Wixom B., and Todd P. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research 16 1 (2005) 85-102
17. Agarwal R., and Prasad J. The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems 22 1 (1998) 15-29
18. Plouffe C., Hulland J., and Vandenbosch M. Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions: Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research 12 2 (2001) 208-222
19. Gefen D., and Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of AIS 16 1 (2005) 91-109
20. Chin W., Marcolin B., and Newsted P. Partial least squares latent variables modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 2 (2003) 189-217