Testing differential expression in nonoverlapping gene pairs: A new perspective for the empirical bayes method

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 301-316

  Klebanov, Lev ^a   Qiu, Xing ^b   Yakovlev, Andrei ^b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlation; Differential expression; Error rates; Gene pairs; Microarray data

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; METHODOLOGY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NOISE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIGENE FAMILY;

EID: 44049103686     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720008003436     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Qiu X, Klebanov L, Yakovlev A, Correlation between gene expression levels and limitations of the empirical Bayes methodology for finding differentially expressed genes. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 4 article 34, 2005.
2. Qiu X, Xiao Y, Gordon A, Yakovlev A, Assessing stability of gene selection in micrarray data analysis, BMC Bioinformatics 7 article 50, 2006.
3. Qiu X, Yakovlev A, Some comments on instability of false discovery rate estimation, J Bioinform Comput Biol 4(5):1057-1068, 2006.
4. Gordon A, Glazko G, Qiu X, Yakovlev A, Control of the mean number of false discoveries, Bonferroni, and stability of multiple testing, Ann Appl Stat 1(1):179-196, 2007.
5. Pavlidis P, Li Q, Noble WS, The effect of replication on gene expression microarray experiments, Bioinformatics 19:1620-1627, 2003.
6. Qiu X, Brooks AI, Klebanov L, Yakovlev A, The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microaxray data, BMC Bioinformatics 6:aRticle 120, 2005.
7. Almudevar A, Klebanov L, Qiu X, Salzman P, Yakovlev A, Utility of correlation measures in analysis of gene expression, NeuroRx 3 3):384-395, 2006.
8. Klebanov L, Yakovlev A, Treating expression levels of different genes as a sample in microarray data analysis: Is it worth a risk?, Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 5:aRticle 9, 2006.
9. Storey JD, Taylor JE, Siegmund D, Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach, J R Stat Soc Ser B 66:187-205, 2004.
10. Cheng C, Pounds S, Boyett JM, Pei D, Kuo ML, Roussel MF, Statistical significance threshold criteria for analysis of microarray gene expression data, Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3(1):aRticle 36, 2004.
11. Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey JD, Tusher V, Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment, J Am Stat Assoc 96:1151-1160, 2001.
12. Efron B, Robbins, empirical Bayes and microarrays, Ann Stat 31 366-378, 2003.
13. Efron B, Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: The choice of a null hypothesis, J Am Stat Assoc 99:96-104, 2004.
14. Efron B, Correlation and large-scale simultaneous testing, J Am Stat Assoc 102: 93-103, 2007.
15. Yeoh EJ et al., Classification, subtype discovery, and prediction of outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling, Cancer Cell 1(2): 133-143, 2002.
16. Klebanov L, Yakovlev A, Diverse correlation structutes in microarray gene expression data, Ann Applied Stat 1(2):538-559, 2007.
17. Singh D et al., Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior, Cancer Cell 1:203-209, 2002.
18. Sotiriou C et al., Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: Understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis, J Natl Cancer Inst 98(4):262-272, 2006.
19. Lamb J et al., The Connectivity Map: Using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease, Science 313:1929-1935, 2006.
20. Klebanov L, Gordon A, Xiao Y, Land H, Yakovlev A, A permutation test motivated by microarray data analysis, Comput Stat Data Anal 50 12):3619-3628, 2006.
21. Westfall PH, Young S, Resampling-based Multiple Testing, Wiley, New York, 1993.
22. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics, J Educ Behav Stat 25:60-83, 2000.
23. Reiner A, Yekutieli D, Benjamini Y, Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures, Bioinformatics 19:368-375, 2003.
24. Cheng C, An adaptive significance threshold criterion for massive multiple hypotheses testing, in The Second Erich L. Lahmann Symposium - Optimality, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Lecture Notes-Monograph Series Vol. 49, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Beachwood, OH, pp. 62-95, 2006.
25. Sen PK, Robust statistical inference for high-dimensional data models with application to genomics, Austrian J Stat 35 2&3):197-214, 2006.