Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 53-62

  Islam, R ^a   Biswal, M P ^a   Alam, S S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Interval judgment; Preference programming

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; INTERVAL JUDGMENT; PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 0031076405     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(95)00377-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arbel, A., "Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation", European Journal of Operational Research 43 (1989) 317-326.
2. Arbel, A., and Vargas, L.G., "The analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments", in: A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Springer-Verlag, New York (1992) 61-70.
3. Arbel, A., and Vargas, L.G., "Preference simulation and preference programming: Robustness issues in priority derivation", European Journal of Operational Research 69 (1993) 200-209.
4. Boender, C.G.E., de Graan, J.G., and Lootsma, F.A., "Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons", Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29 (1989) 133-143.
5. Buckley, J.J., "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis", Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17 (1985) 233-247.
6. Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A., and Levy, D.E., "Applications of the analytic hierarchy process: A categorized, annotated bibliography", in: B.L. Golden et al. (eds.), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, 37-58.
7. Hämäläinen, R.P., Salo, A.A., and Pöysti, K., "Observations about consensus in a multi-criteria environment", in: J.F. Nunamaker and J.F. Sprague (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Vol. IV, Hawaii, 1992, 190-195.
8. Ignizio, J.P., Linear Programming in Single & Multiple Objective Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1982).
9. Islam, R., Biswal, M.P., and Alam, S.S., "The effect of splitting objectives in the analytic hierarchy process", Ricerca Operativa 24 (1994) 5-25.
10. Islam, R., Biswal, M.P., and Alam, S.S., "A simulation study of Saaty's analytic hierarchy process", in: P.K. Kapur and V.K. Sehgal (eds.), Operations Research: Theory and Practice, Spaniel Publ., New Delhi, 1995, S1. No. 14.
11. Kress, M., "Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation - A comment", European Journal of Operational Research 52 (1991) 382-383.
12. Saaty, T.L., "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15 (1977) 234-281.
13. Saaty, T.L., and Vargas, L.G., "Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process", European Journal of Operational Research 32 (1987) 107-117.
14. Salo, A.A., "Inconsistency analysis by approximately specified priorities", Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17 (1993) 123-133.
15. Salo, A.A., and Hämäläinenn, R.P., "Ambiguous preference statements in the analytic hierarchy process", Research Report A39, System Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, 1991.
16. Takeda, E., Cogger, K.O., and Yu, P.L., "Estimating criteria weights using eigenvectors: A comparative study", European Journal of Operational Research 29 (1987) 360-369.
17. Van Laarhoven, P.G.M., and Pedrycz, W., "A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory", Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (1983) 229-241.
18. Vargas, L.G., "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its application", European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990) 2-8.